Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low birth weight infants
Authors
Arne Ohlsson1, Janet Lacy2
Background - Methods - Results - Characteristics of Included Studies - References - Data Tables and Graphs
1Departments of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
2Paediatrics, Scarborough, Canada
Citation example: Ohlsson A, Lacy J. Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000361. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000361.pub2.
Contact person
Arne Ohlsson
Departments of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
University of Toronto
600 University Avenue
Toronto Ontario M5G 1X5
Canada
E-mail: aohlsson@mtsinai.on.ca
Dates
| Assessed as Up-to-date: | 06 February 2010 |
|---|---|
| Date of Search: | 17 December 2009 |
| Next Stage Expected: | 06 February 2012 |
| Protocol First Published: | Issue 2, 1998 |
| Review First Published: | Issue 2, 1998 |
| Last Citation Issue: | Issue 1, 2004 |
What's new
| Date / Event | Description |
|---|---|
| 07 April 2010 Amended | Review updated Issue 4, 2010. Risk of Bias tables completed for this amended version. |
History
| Date / Event | Description |
|---|---|
| 25 February 2010 Updated | This updates the existing review "Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low birth weight infants" published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ohlsson 2007). Updated search found no new trials. No changes to conclusions. |
| 03 July 2008 Amended | Converted to new review format. |
| 23 July 2007 Updated | This is an update of the review "Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low birth weight infants" published in The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004 (Ohlsson 2004). |
| 20 October 2003 New citation: conclusions changed | Substantive amendment |
Abstract
Background
Nosocomial infections continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Preterm infants are deficient in IgG and, therefore, administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may have the potential of preventing or altering the course of nosocomial infections.
Objectives
To assess the effectiveness/safety of IVIG administration to preterm and/or low birth weight infants in preventing nosocomial infections.
Search methods
For this update MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library were searched in December 2009.
Selection criteria
We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which administration of IVIG was compared to a control group that received a placebo or no intervention in preterm (< 37 weeks gestational age) and/or LBW (<2500 g) infants. Studies that were primarily designed to assess the effect of IVIG on humoral immune markers were excluded as were studies in which the follow-up period was one week or less).
Data collection and analysis
Data collection and analysis was performed in accordance with the methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
Results
Nineteen studies enrolling approximately 5,000 preterm and/or LBW infants met inclusion criteria.
When all studies were combined there was a statistically significant reduction in sepsis (typical RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74, 0.98; typical RD -0.03, 95% CI 0.00, -0.05). There was statistically significant between-study heterogeneity (I2 54%). A statistically significant reduction was found for any serious infection, one or more episodes, when all studies were combined (typical RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74, 0.92; typical RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.02, -0.06). There was statistically significant between-study heterogeneity (I2 50%). There were no statistically significant differences for mortality from all causes, mortality from infection, incidence of NEC, BPD and IVH or length of hospital stay. No major adverse effects of IVIG were reported in any of the studies.
Authors' conclusions
IVIG administration results in a 3% reduction in sepsis and a 4% reduction in one or more episodes of any serious infection but is not associated with reductions in other clinically important outcomes including mortality. Prophylactic use of IVIG is not associated with any short-term serious side effects.
The decision to use prophylactic IVIG will depend on the costs and the values assigned to the clinical outcomes. There is no justification for further RCTs testing the efficacy of previously studied IVIG preparations to reduce nosocomial infections in preterm and/or LBW infants.
Plain language summary
Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low birth weight infants
Infants may acquire infections while in the womb or in the hospital after birth, especially if they require intensive care. Such infections may cause serious illness or death. Transport of immunoglobulins (substances in the blood that can fight infections) from the mother to the fetus mainly occurs after 32 weeks gestation and infants do not begin to produce immunoglobulins until several months after birth. Theoretically, the adverse effects of infections could be reduced by the preventive administration of intravenous immunoglobulin. To date, approximately 5,000 infants have been enrolled in studies to evaluate the effect of prophylactic use of intravenous immunoglobulins on neonatal outcomes. Intravenous administration of immunoglobulins results in a 3% reduction in blood born infections and a 4% reduction in any serious infection. Intravenous administration of immunoglobulins is not associated with reductions in other important neonatal outcomes or length of hospital stay. Most importantly, intravenous immunoglobulin administration does not have any important effect on mortality. Prophylactic use of IVIG is not associated with any short term serious side effects. From a clinical perspective, a 3 - 4% reduction in nosocomial infections without a reduction in mortality or other important clinical outcomes is of marginal importance.
Background
Description of the condition
Although survival has improved for preterm and/or low birth weight (LBW) infants, nosocomial infection continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. A 25% incidence of late onset infection has recently been reported in a cohort of 6,911 very LBW infants who were admitted to 12 US centres and who survived beyond three days (Stoll 1996). Neonates in whom late-onset sepsis developed were significantly more likely to die than those who were not infected (17% vs. 7%; p < 0.0001) (Stoll 1996).
Description of the intervention
Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) contains the pooled IgG (immunoglobulin G) extracted from the plasma of over one thousand blood donors.
IVIG is frequently given to immune deficient patients who have decreased antibody production capabilities. In these immune deficient patients, IVIG is administered to maintain adequate antibodies levels to prevent infections and confers a passive immunity.
How the intervention might work
Maternal transport of immunoglobulins to the fetus mainly occurs after 32 weeks gestation and endogenous synthesis does not begin until about 24 weeks after birth, so the preterm infant is especially vulnerable to infectious sources in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (Baker 1990a). The mean serum levels of IgG are 400 mg/dl in infants less than 32 weeks gestational age (GA) compared to 1000 mg/dl in term infants (Hobbs 1967; Stiehm 1966). The idea of preventing nosocomial infection with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is attractive as administration of IVIG provides IgG that can bind to cell surface receptors, provide opsonic activity, activate complement, promote antibody dependent cytotoxicity, and improve neutrophilic chemo luminescence (Baley 1988).
Why it is important to do this review
The administration of IVIG to LBW infants has been studied extensively. Numerous descriptive review articles, commentaries and editorials on the use of IVIG in neonates have been published, often by the same researchers. These papers have included several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the authors' personal experience with IVIG and/or information about the preparation or dosing regimen of IVIG (Weisman 1986; Bortolussi 1986a; Bortolussi 1986b; Fischer 1986; Stiehm 1986; Baley 1988; Fischer 1988; Gonzalez 1989; Kyllonen 1989; Stabile 1989; Noya 1989; Johnston 1990; Fischer 1990a; Fischer 1990b; Fischer 1990c; Baker 1990a; Baker 1990b; Bussel 1990b; Hammarstrom 1990; Kliegman 1990; Stiehm 1990; Whitelaw 1990; Berger 1991; Hill 1991a; Hill 1991b; Irani 1991; Kliegman 1991; Magny 1991a; Rondini 1991; Haque 1992; Siber 1992; Weisman 1992; Hill 1993; Weisman 1993; Weisman 1994b; Wolach 1997). Salzer (Salzer 1991) presented (in abstract form only) the results of a meta-analysis of seven studies, and concluded that there was no significant reduction in the incidence of sepsis in the treated group. In "Effective Care of the Newborn Infant", Baley & Fanaroff (Baley 1992) presented overviews of RCTs that studied the administration of IVIG to neonates. They reviewed seven studies of the prophylactic use of IVIG that reported an outcome of sepsis. They concluded that "The preliminary data generated in trials of IVIG are promising, but use of this treatment modality still needs to be considered experimental and should only, as yet, be used under study conditions." Lacy & Ohlsson (Lacy 1995) included additional trials and concluded that routine administration of IVIG to preterm infants to prevent infection is not recommended. Jenson & Pollock (Jenson 1997) used slightly different inclusion criteria and, like Lacy & Ohlsson (Lacy 1995), noted heterogeneity among studies. They concluded that "this heterogeneity probably belies the minimal benefit, at most, of prophylactic IVIG...". The results of a Canadian multidisciplinary consensus-building initiative (Consensus 1997), has been published and the use of IVIG for prophylaxis of neonatal nosocomial infection was considered to be inappropriate. This review provides an update of our previously updated review (Ohlsson 2001) first published in 1998 (Ohlsson 1998).
Objectives
To use systematic review/meta-analytic techniques to determine if IVIG administration (compared to placebo or no intervention) to preterm [< 37 weeks gestational age (GA) at birth)] and/or LBW (< 2500 g birth weight) infants is effective/safe in preventing nosocomial infections.
Methods
Criteria for considering studies for this review
Types of studies
Studies in which preterm and/or LBW neonates were randomized to receive IVIG or either a placebo or no intervention.
Types of interventions
IVIG for the prevention of bacterial or fungal infection. Studies that were designed to evaluate the effect of IVIG on humoral immune markers were excluded as were studies in which the follow-up period was one week or less. Studies that assessed the effectiveness of IVIG for treatment of suspected or confirmed infection were excluded.
Types of outcome measures
Primary outcomes
1. Sepsis, one or more episodes (clinical signs and symptoms of sepsis and positive blood culture for bacteria or fungi).
Secondary outcomes
- Any serious infection [clinical signs and symptoms in conjunction with positive cultures (bacteria or fungi) from normally sterile body fluids (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine obtained by catheterization or suprapubic tap, or from tissue at autopsy)]. As per this definition, cases of sepsis if reported separately were also included in any serious infection.
- Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) diagnosed according to Bell's criteria (Bell 1978). For repeated episodes of sepsis, any serious infection and NEC, only one occurrence per infant was counted as an outcome.
- Death from all causes.
- Deaths from infection (including death from NEC).
- Length of hospital stay.
- Incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) defined as additional oxygen requirement (above room air) at 28 days of age or requiring assisted ventilation for reasons other than apnea of prematurity.
- Incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), any grade, classified according to Papile (Papile 1983).
- Incidence of IVH, grade 3 or 4, classified according to Papile (Papile 1983)
- Reports on possible side effects as described by the authors.
Search methods for identification of studies
The search strategy used to identify studies was according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
Electronic searches
MEDLINE was searched from 1966 to July, 2007. EMBASE (Excerpta Medica online) was searched from 1980 to July 2007. The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007 was searched. No language restrictions were applied. Ms Elizabeth Uleryk developed and applied an extensive search strategy (available upon request) for MEDLINE and EMBASE in February 2001 and September 2003. The same strategy was used in 2007.
In December 2009, we updated the search as follows: MEDLINE (search via PubMed), CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library) were searched from 2003 to December 2009. Search term: immunoglobulin. Limits: human, newborn infant and clinical trial. No language restrictions were applied.
Data collection and analysis
Data collection and analysis were done in accordance with the methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
Selection of studies
The criteria used to select studies for inclusion in this overview were:
- Design: RCT in which treatment with IVIG was compared to a control group that received a placebo or no intervention.
- Population: preterm (< 37 weeks gestational age) and/or LBW (< 2500 g) infants.
- Intervention: IVIG for the prevention of bacterial/fungal infection during initial hospital stay (8 days or more). (Studies that were primarily designed to assess the effect of IVIG on humoral immune markers were excluded, as were studies in which the follow-up period was one week or less. Studies designed to assess the effectiveness of treatment with IVIG for suspected/established infection were excluded).
- At least one of the following outcomes was reported: sepsis, any serious infection, death from all causes, death from infection, length of hospital stay, IVH, NEC, or BPD. Reports on side-effects.
The titles (and abstracts when available) in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library printouts were reviewed by the two authors. Any article that either review author felt might meet the inclusion criteria noted above or that either felt should have its reference list searched was retrieved. Informal attempts were made to locate unpublished studies and attempts were made to request additional information from authors of published studies. Information was obtained on one published study and one unpublished study (Sandberg 2000, Metsvaht 2001).
All identified trials (excluding those that used IVIG for treatment) are listed in the Table of Included Studies or in the Table of Excluded Studies.
Data extraction and management
Data abstraction forms were developed and pilot tested to verify definitions of terms. The two review authors independently abstracted information on each study and one (AO) checked for any discrepancies and pooled the results. Data abstraction included: whether the study involved prophylaxis or treatment, number of patients enrolled, number of patients enrolled but later excluded, the time period and geographical location of the study, baseline characteristics of patients, inclusion/exclusion criteria, preparation and dosing regime of IVIG and placebo, length of follow-up.
Information on outcomes and the numbers of affected infants was abstracted. The total number of infants with sepsis [clinical signs and symptoms plus positive blood culture (bacteria or fungi)] and any serious infection [clinical signs and symptoms in conjunction with positive cultures (bacteria or fungi) from normally sterile body fluids] was abstracted as was information on NEC, death from all causes, and deaths from infection. Information on length of hospital stay, incidence of BPD and IVH was collected. Information on probable infection was not collected as the definitions used by the different investigators were too variable.
Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
An assessment of the quality of the included studies (excluding abstracts) was performed independently by JBL and AO using the criteria developed by the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. These criteria include: I) Blinding of randomization, II) Blinding of intervention, III) Complete follow-up, IV) Blinding of outcome measurement. For each criterion there were three possibilities: yes, can't tell or no. The assignment was not done with the assessors blinded to author, institution, journal of publication or results, as both assessors were familiar with most of the studies and the typographical layout of the journals, and would have knowledge of these even when blinded. In addition the results sections of articles often include methodological information. After the independent evaluation, the two assessors discussed the results for each study and any discrepancies were resolved.
For the update in 2009, the following issues were evaluated and entered into the Risk of Bias Table:
1. Sequence generation: Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
2. Allocation concealment: Was allocation adequately concealed?
3. Blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated intervention adequately prevented during the study? At study entry? At the time of outcome assessment?
4. Incomplete outcome data: Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed?
5. Selective outcome reporting: Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
6. Other sources of bias: Was the study apparently free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias?
Measures of treatment effect
The statistical package (RevMan 4.2) provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used. Relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) with 95% CI's using the fixed effects model are reported. If there was a statistically significant reduction in the RD the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated.
Assessment of heterogeneity
Statistically significant between study heterogeneity was reported when identified and the test for inconsistency (I2 statistic) was applied when statistically significant heterogeneity was noted.
Data synthesis
Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software (RevMan 5), supplied by the Cochrane Collaboration. For estimates of typical relative risk and risk difference, we used the Mantel-Haenszel method. For measured quantities, we used the inverse variance method. All meta-analyses were done using the fixed effect model.
Results
Description of studies
Included Studies:
Details of the included studies are provided in the Table of Included Studies.
Nineteen studies including approximately 5,000 preterm and/or LBW infants met inclusion criteria. These studies were performed in many countries (U.S., Italy, U. K., Saudi Arabia, France, Thailand, Belgium, Turkey, Sweden and Austria). The amount of IVIG per dose varied from 120 mg/kg (Haque 1986) to 1g/kg (Bussel 1990a). The number of doses varied from a single dose (Atici 1996, Haque 1986, Christensen 1989, Ratrisawadi 1991, Weisman 1994a) to seven doses (Stabile 1988).
Different IVIG preparations were used; Gammagard (Baker 1992); Sandoglobulin (Atici 1996, Bussel 1990a, Chirico 1987, Clapp 1989, Fanaroff 1994, Tanzer 1997, Van Overmeire 1993, Weisman 1994a); Gamimmune (Christensen 1989); Intraglobin (Conway 1990, Haque 1986, Ratrisawadi 1991); IgVena (Didato 1988); Biotransfusion (Magny 1991b); unnamed product (Spady 1994; Sandberg 2000 - study supported by Baxter AG, Austria); Venogamma (Stabile 1988); Gammumine-N (Chou 1998).
Excluded Studies:
Six studies were excluded as they included infants that were heavier or more mature at birth than the inclusion criteria allowed for (Kinney 1991, Adhikari 1996); lacked information on outcomes (Kacet 1991; Malik 1990); lacked a randomized control group (Acunas 1994) or immunoglobulin was given intramuscularly (Monintja 1989).
Risk of bias in included studies
The assessment of individual studies are presented in the Table "Characteristics of Included Studies".
The methodological quality of the studies varied. Five studies were of high quality (Baker 1992, Christensen 1989, Clapp 1989, Fanaroff-I 1994, Weisman 1994a), i.e. complete follow-up, blinding of randomization, intervention and outcome measurement could be ascertained from the published reports. In the remaining 15 studies elements of bias could not be excluded. The lack of a placebo in 10 of the studies (Atici 1996, Chirico 1987, Conway 1990, Didato 1988, Fanaroff 1994 - phase II, Haque 1986, Ratrisawadi 1991, Stabile 1988, Tanzer 1997, Van Overmeire 1993) precluded blinding of the caregivers. One study (Fanaroff 1994) included two phases; phase I including a placebo but not phase II. In several studies blinding of randomization was not clearly described (Chirico 1987, Magny 1991b, Ratrisawadi 1991, Stabile 1988). In the study by Sandberg (Sandberg 2000), an intention to treat analysis was not applied. One study (Spady 1994) has been published in abstract form only and the quality could therefore not be fully assessed. The study by Bussel (Bussel 1990a) represents an interim analysis with data lacking from a large proportion of the infants randomized.
Effects of interventions
One additional trial was identified in July 2007 (Lelik 2004). However, this trial enrolled infants greater than 38 weeks gestational age and greater than 2,500 g birth weight. The study was therefore excluded. No new studies were identified in the literature search conducted in September 2003. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria. These included a total of approximately 5,000 preterm and/or LBW infants and reported on at least one of the outcomes of interest for this systematic review. For details of results, see Tables of Analyses. It should be noted that for most outcomes, the large study by Fanaroff (1994) greatly influenced the summary statistics with an assigned weight ranging from 42.7 % for the outcome of any serious infection to 76.1% for the outcome of IVH grade 3 or 4.
PRIMARY OUTCOME:
IVIG VS. PLACEBO OR NO TREATMENT (Comparison 1):
Sepsis, one or more episodes (Outcome 1.1):
Ten studies (including 3,975 infants) reported on the outcome of one or more episodes of sepsis per infant (clinical signs and symptoms of infection and positive blood culture). Only the study by Ratrisawadi (1991) showed a statistically significant reduction in sepsis (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.19, 0.79). When all studies were combined there was a statistically significant (p = 0.02) reduction in sepsis [typical RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.98); typical RD [-0.03 (95% CI -0.05, 0.00); NNT 33]. There was significant between-study heterogeneity for this outcome for both RR and RD (p = 0.02; I2 = 54%).
Any serious infection, one or more episodes (Outcome 1.2):
Sixteen studies (including 4,986 infants) reported on one or more episodes of any serious infection (sepsis, meningitis, urinary tract infection). Four studies (Atici 1996, Baker 1992, Haque 1986, Ratrisawadi 1991) showed a statistically significant reduction in any serious infection. A statistically significant reduction was also found when all studies were combined [typical RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.74, 0.92); typical RD -0.04 (95% CI -0.06, -0.02); NNT 25 (95% CI 17, 50)]. There was statistically significant between-study heterogeneity for this outcome (p = 0.01 and I2 = 50% for RR; p = 0.0006 and I2 = 62% for RD).
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), one or more episodes (Outcome 1.3):
Seven studies (including 4,081 infants) reported on NEC (Bell's stage 2 or 3). One study (Fanaroff 1994) showed a borderline statistically significant increase in NEC (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.00, 1.59). When all studies were combined there was no significant increase [typical RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.89, 1.32); typical RD 0.01 (95% CI -0.01, 0.02)]. There was no statistically significant between-study heterogeneity for this outcome for RR (p = 0.14; I2 = 38%), but for RD (p = 0.05, I2 = 52%).
Mortality (all causes) (Outcome 1.4):
Fifteen studies (including 4,125 infants) reported on mortality from all causes. Two studies (Chirico 1987, Tanzer 1997) showed a statistically significant reduction in this outcome When all studies were combined, there was no statistically significant reduction [typical RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.75, 1.05); typical RD -0.01 (95% CI -0.03, 0.01)]. There was no statistically significant between-study heterogeneity for this outcome for RR (p = 0.22; I2 = 21%) and for RD (p = 0.15; I2 = 28%).
Mortality (infectious) (Outcome 1.5):
Ten studies (including 1,690 infants) reported on mortality from infections. One study (Atici 1996) showed a statistically significant reduction in this outcome. The overall analysis showed no significant impact of IVIG prophylaxis on this outcome [typical RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.56, 1.22); typical RD -0.01 (95% CI -0.03, 0.01)]. There was no statistically significant between-study heterogeneity for this outcome for RR (p = 0.11; I2 = 40%) and for RD (p = 0.08; I2 = 42%).
Duration of hospitalization (Outcome 1.6):
None of eight studies (including 3,562 infants) reported a significant reduction in length of hospital stay following IVIG prophylaxis. The overall typical weighted mean difference was -2.1 days (95% CI -4.5, 0.3). There was no statistically significant between-study heterogeneity (p = 0.67 and I2 = 0% for both RR and RD).
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (Outcome 1.7):
In only one study was both the outcome of BPD defined and data provided. Several authors failed to define the outcome of BPD and others defined the outcome but did not provide data. In a small study, Clapp (Clapp 1989) showed a trend towards increase in BPD [RR 1.53 (95% CI 0.78,3.01); RD 0.10 (95% CI -0.06, 0.25)]. In another small study, Chou (Chou 1998) found similar results [RR 1.61 (95% CI 0.42, 6.16); RD 0.06 (95%CI -0.11, 0.23)]. When combined the typical RR was 1.55 (95% CI 0.85, 2.84) and the typical RD was 0.09 (95% CI -0.03, 0.20). There was no between-study heterogeneity for this outcome for RR (p = 0.95; I2 = 0%) and for RD (p = 0.74; I2 = 0%).
Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) any grade (Outcome 1.8):
Four studies (including 3,176 infants) reported on IVH (any grade). Prophylactic IVIG did not have a statistically significant effect on this outcome [typical RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.88, 1.19); typical RD 0.00 (95% CI -0.02, 0.03)]. There was no statistically significant between-study heterogeneity for this outcome [RR (p = 0.39; I2 = 0.9%); RD (p = 0.39; I2 = 0.6%)].
Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade 3 or 4 (Outcome 1.9):
Two studies (including 3,000 infants) reported on IVH grade 3 or 4. The typical RR was 1.01 (95% CI 0.85, 1.21) and the typical RD was 0.00 (95% CI -0.02, 0.03). There was statistically significant between-study heterogeneity [RR (p = 0.09; I2 = 65 %; RD (p = 0.08; I2 = 68%)].
A rise in serum IgG in the treatment group was noted in all studies that measured serum levels of IgG.
No major adverse effects of IVIG were reported in any of the studies.
Results from excluded studies (See Table of Excluded Studies) were similar to those from included studies.
Discussion
One additional trial was identified for this update of the review conducted in July 2007 (Lelik 2004). However, the study included infants > 38 weeks gestation and > 2,500 g birth weight. Therefore, the study was excluded. The effectiveness of IVIG to prevent nosocomial infections in neonates has been well studied. To date over 5,000 preterm and/or LBW neonates have been enrolled in trials from many different areas of the world. The methodological quality of the included trials varied. Five studies were of high quality, but elements of bias could not be excluded in the other studies, mainly due to the fact that the intervention and the assessment of outcomes were performed unblinded to group assignment or there was lack of complete follow-up of all randomized infants. IVIG resulted in increased levels of IgG in serum. There were no major side effects noted.
A small but statistically significant reduction in the incidence of sepsis and of any serious infection was found. There was statistically significant between-study heterogeneity for these outcomes. The heterogeneity might in part be explained by: variable rates of sepsis and any serious infection in the control groups; differences in preparation, dose and/or dose schedule for IVIG; differences in causative organisms for nosocomial infection; differences in attention to other preventive measures for nosocomial infection and differences in other co-interventions by place and over time. Some asymmetry was noted when funnel plots were performed for sepsis and any serious infection. For the two main outcomes, sepsis (one or more episodes) and any serious infection (one or more episodes), moderate inconsistency between the study results were noted (I2 54% and 50% respectively).
There were no statistically significant differences for mortality from all causes, mortality from infection, NEC, BPD, or IVH. The results for these outcomes were all centred around a RR of 1.0 with very narrow CIs indicating no trends in either direction. In none of the studies that provided data on IVH was there an assurance that all neonates were subjected to ascertainment of an IVH according to a preset schedule for ultrasonographic examination. There was a trend towards shortened duration of hospital stay with IVIG treatment [WMD -2.1 days (95% CI -4.5, 0.3 days)]. The outcome of hospital stay is highly dependent on the GA at birth of the neonate, availability of institutions providing Level II care to which the neonate can be transferred and the social situation of the family.
It is possible that the IVIG preparations used in these studies did not contain the necessary antibodies to prevent infection and that the use of preparations with known specific antibodies against common pathogens in a specific neonatal intensive care unit might be more effective (Weisman 1994b).
The benefits of a 3.0% and 4.0 % reduction in sepsis and any serious infection respectively should be weighed against the costs and the values assigned to this outcome. There have been no serious side-effects reported from IVIG to date, but unknown long-term risks of the administration of blood products and the pain associated with establishing an intravenous route for IVIG should be taken into account.
Units with high nosocomial infection rates may want to compare and adjust their infection control policies to those settings with low rates using bench marking techniques. If the rates remain high following such measures, the use of IVIG might be justified. The prophylactic use of IVIG should be based on a full economic evaluation and a clinical decision analysis that incorporates baseline risk for serious nosocomial infections, both clinical and economic outcomes following prophylactic IVIG, and values attached to infections prevented. Such analyses have not been performed.
Although there are differences in inclusion criteria, number of studies published at the time of the reviews, and statistical analyses, the results of our systematic review are close to those of three previous meta-analyses (Lacy 1995, Jenson 1997, Ohlsson 1998). The results of these meta-analyses should encourage basic scientists and clinicians to pursue other avenues to enhance the immune system of preterm and/or LBW infants and to prevent nosocomial infections.
Authors' conclusions
Implications for practice
IVIG administration results in a 3 - 4% reduction in sepsis/any serious infection but is not associated with reductions in mortality or other morbidities (NEC, IVH, length of hospital stay). Prophylactic use of IVIG is not associated with any short-term serious side effects. The decision to use prophylactic IVIG will depend on the costs and the values assigned to the clinical outcomes.
Implications for research
A full economic evaluation and a clinical decision analysis that incorporates baseline risk for confirmed nosocomial infection, clinical outcomes and economic outcomes following prophylactic IVIG, and values attached to infections prevented is needed.
There is no justification for further RCTs testing the efficacy of previously studied IVIG preparations to reduce nosocomial infections in preterm and/or LBW infants. It is possible that the IVIG preparations used in published studies did not contain the necessary antibodies to prevent infection. The use of preparations with known specific antibodies against the common pathogens in a specific neonatal intensive care unit might be more effective, and RCTs to test the effectiveness of such preparations may be justified. The results of these meta-analyses should encourage basic scientists and clinicians to pursue other avenues to prevent nosocomial infections.
Acknowledgements
Dr. K. Thiringer provided us with additional information on the trial by Sandberg 2000.
Ms. Elizabeth Uleryk developed and executed extensive searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE in February of 2001 and September 2003.
Dr. Ryzhak Oleu assisted with the translation from Russian to English of the study by Lelik (Lelik 2004).
The Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded in part with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN267200603418C.
Contributions of authors
Arne Ohlsson
Literature search and identification of trials for inclusion
Evaluation of methodologic quality of included trials
Abstraction of data
Verifying and entering data into RevMan
Writing text of review
Janet Lacy
Literature search and identification of trials for inclusion
Evaluation of methodologic quality of included trials
Abstraction of data
Writing text of review
Both reviewers contributed to this update
Arne Ohlsson (AO) wrote the original review and updated the review in 2003 and 2007.
The February 2010 was conducted centrally by the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group staff (Yolanda Montagne, Diane Haughton, and Roger Soll). This update was reviewed and approved by AO.
Characteristics of studies
Characteristics of included studies
Atici 1996
| Methods | Single-centre, randomized, controlled trial without the use of a placebo. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 76 infants with GA < 34 wk. |
| Interventions | 40 infants with mean GA (SD) 31.4 +/- 2.9 wk, mean BW (SD) 1623 +/- 468 g received 0.5 g/kg of IVIG (Sandoglobulin, Sandoz) within 24 hours of birth. |
| Outcomes | Proved infection (clinical findings and blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture positive for a pathogen). |
| Notes | Proved infection, mortality from any cause, infectious mortality and days in hospital could be ascertained from this study. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | A block randomization method was used. No further information provided. |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear | A block randomization method was used. No further information provided. |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported on all infants enrolled |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Baker 1992
| Methods | Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 588 infants with a BW of 500 - 1750 g. Age 3 - 7 days. |
| Interventions | 287 infants received 500 mg/kg of IVIG (Gammagard, Baxter Healthcare, Hyland Division, Glendale, Calif.) at enrolment (age - 3 to 7 days), 1 wk later, and then every 14 days until a total of five infusions had been given or until hospital discharge, whichever came first. |
| Outcomes | Proved infection [clinical findings of sepsis and at least one of the following: a positive blood culture (bacteria or fungi), the isolation of a pathogen from a normally sterile body site (CSF, pleural, peritoneal, or joint fluid; bone; soft-tissue; or urine obtained by suprapubic or bladder catheterization), or the isolation of virus from an infant with clinical deterioration]. |
| Notes | The following outcomes could be ascertained from this study: any serious infection (bacterial + fungal), IVH, NEC, deaths from all causes. Total episodes for sepsis were reported. There were 50 episodes of sepsis among 287 infants in the IVIG group and 75 episodes of sepsis among 197 infants in the placebo group. The outcome "sepsis, one or more episodes", could not be ascertained from this study. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Yes | A randomization table was used |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Infants were randomly assigned by the pharmacist at the study site to receive either IVIG or albumin placebo |
| Blinding? | Yes | Albumin placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Bussel 1990a
| Methods | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 240 infants with BW < 1300 g. |
| Interventions | 61 neonates (mean BW 977 g) received a dose of 1 g of a 6% solution of IVIG (Sandoglobulin, Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, N.J.) on 4 of the first 5 days of life, and a fifth dose was administered on day 15 or as close to that day as possible (the dose could be given as late as day 21). |
| Outcomes | Sepsis (signs and symptoms compatible with sepsis and a positive blood or CSF culture) |
| Notes | This is an interim analysis of a larger study, the results of which have not been reported to date. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | A random-number generator was used |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Blinding of randomization - yes |
| Blinding? | Yes | Albumin was used as placebo |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | No | Data for 172 patients are presented in this preliminary analysis; of these 46 were excluded from the statistical analysis (29 because they died during the first 5 days of life, 4 because of protocol violations, and 13 because of inadequate follow-up - usually because of their return to the referring hospital. 126 infants remained). |
| Free of selective reporting? | No | Noted in incomplete outcome data section above. |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Chirico 1987
| Methods | Randomized, controlled trial without the use of a placebo |
|---|---|
| Participants | In this study a subgroup with a BW</= 1500 g (n = 86) of the total population of 133 infants (BW range 550 - 3340 g; GA range 24 - 40 wk) fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. |
| Interventions | 43 infants received 0.5 g/kg of IVIG (Sandoglobulin) weekly for 1 month. |
| Outcomes | Criteria for diagnosis of sepsis, meningitis, arthritis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and surface infection included both a positive culture of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, tracheal aspirate, urine or pus, respectively, and the presence of clinical and non microbiological laboratory features. For the diagnosis of pneumonia, the appearance of a new infiltrate on a chest roentgenogram was also required. |
| Notes | The outcomes of sepsis, any serious infection, NEC, length of hospital stay, death from all causes and deaths from infections could be ascertained from this study. The 3 infants in the control group who died within 3 days of life are included in our analyses as per intention to treat. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Sealed envelopes were used |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | 3 infants in the control group who died within 24 hours after birth were excluded from the analysis by the authors. |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Chou 1998
| Methods | Randomized placebo controlled trial with the use of a non-identical looking placebo (saline). |
|---|---|
| Participants | 61 infants with a BW < 1500 g were enrolled. Single centre study, Taiwan. |
| Interventions | 31 infants, mean BW (SD) 1210 +/- 340 g, mean GA (SD) 29.7 +/- 2.2 wk received Gammumine-N (Miles Inc. Cutter Biological, USA). IVIG was infused for 30 minutes to 2 hours within the first 12 hours of birth, and every 2 wk until the patient weighed 1800 g or was discharged. The dose of IVIG was 750-1000 mg/kg/dose if the infant's BW was < 1000 g and 500-750 mg/kg/dose if the infant's BW was between 1001-1500 g. |
| Outcomes | Proved infection was defined as bacteremia (positive blood culture or CSF culture) with clinical deterioration or haemodynamic change. |
| Notes | Any serious infection, total mortality, IVH, NEC, BPD, days in hospital and serum IgG levels were reported. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear | Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups |
| Blinding? | No | A non-identical looking placebo (saline) was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Complete follow-up - yes |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Christensen 1989
| Methods | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
|---|---|
| Participants | 20 preterm neonates, weight < 2000 g at entry to study and < 7 days of age. |
| Interventions | 10 neonates received IVIG (Gamimmune-N, Cutter Biologicals, Berkeley, Calif.) 5% IgG in 10% maltose at 15 ml/kg BW as a single infusion. |
| Outcomes | Nosocomial infection (not defined) |
| Notes | This study provides information on deaths from infections and deaths from all causes. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | The IVIG and placebo were dispensed from the pharmacy to the study nurses in accordance with a random number sequence known only to the study pharmacist |
| Blinding? | Yes | Albumin was used as placebo |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Clapp 1989
| Methods | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Participants | 115 infants with BW of 600 to 2000 g and < 48 hours of age. |
| Interventions | 56 neonates (GA = 30 wk; Mean BW (SD) 1.3 +/- 0.7 kg) received IVIG (Sandoglobulin). Initial infusions of IVIG were 500 mg/kg for infants weighing > 1000 g at birth and 700 mg/kg for infants weighing < 1000 g. If serum IgG levels were < 700 mg/dl on day 2 or 6 after transfusion in the IVIG group, an additional dose of IVIG was administered at that time and subsequent doses were increased by 200 mg/kg. The objective was to maintain IgG serum levels at >700 mg/dl. |
| Outcomes | Sepsis (systemic clinical deterioration with a positive blood culture, cerebrospinal fluid, or aspirate of another normally sterile body cavity). |
| Notes | From the data presented the outcomes of sepsis, any serious infection, NEC, BPD, IVH, length of hospital stay, deaths from all causes and deaths from infection could be ascertained. Three episodes of sepsis/proved infection occurred in (an) infant(s) born at 24 weeks GA and BW of 600 g. We assumed that this was only one infant and assigned only one outcome in the meta-analyses. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | All investigators and caretakers, with the exception of clinical pharmacist, were unaware of the random assignment of each infant |
| Blinding? | Unclear | A placebo was used but a 6% or 12% sucrose solution was used, which may not look identical and would taste differently should a care takes have tried to taste a drop. |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Conway 1990
| Methods | Randomized controlled trial without the use of a placebo |
|---|---|
| Participants | 66 neonates of < 30 wk GA. |
| Interventions | 34 infants received 200 mg/kg IVIG (Intraglobin F, Biotest Pharma, FRG) within 48 hours of birth and at 3-weekly intervals until discharge from the neonatal unit. On clinical suspicion of infection, neonates in the treatment group only were given a supplementary dose of IVIG 100 mg/kg. A further 100 mg/kg was given within the next 48 hours if infection was confirmed. |
| Outcomes | Sepsis (blood-culture-proven infection). |
| Notes | The outcomes of sepsis and NEC could by ascertained. We used as denominators all randomized patients. We included the infants that were withdrawn because of early death in the outcome of mortality (all causes). One infant with two episodes of NEC was counted as one outcome. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | no information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Sealed envelopes |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Eleven infants, 6 in the control group and 5 in the treatment group, were withdrawn from the trial due to early death from extreme prematurity (n=7), early return to the referring hospital (n=3), and elective treatment with IVIG for severe congenital septicaemia (n=1). |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | See "Incomplete outcome data addressed?" |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Didato 1988
| Methods | Randomized controlled trial without the use of a placebo |
|---|---|
| Participants | 80 infants with a BW of 2000 g or less. |
| Interventions | 40 infants received 0.5 g/kg/week of IVIG (IgVena, Sclavo; Siena, Italy) until they reached the GA of 36 wk and during the entire period of intensive care. |
| Outcomes | Sepsis defined as clinical manifestations, microbiologic findings (positive blood culture or CSF culture) and non microbiologic laboratory findings (total and differential white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, platelet count, tests of haemostatic function). |
| Notes | Any serious infection, deaths from all causes and deaths from infection could be ascertained in this study. As sepsis included neonates with positive CSF cultures the results were included in the any serious infection category only. Data could not be separated between sepsis and meningitis. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | Randomized controlled trial without the use of a placebo |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Randomly assigned by sealed envelopes |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all infants randomized |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Fanaroff 1994
| Methods | Multicentre, two-phase controlled trial. Phase I was placebo controlled and double-blinded; phase II was not placebo controlled. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 2,416 infants with BW 501-1500 g and randomized at a mean age of 44 +/- 25 hours after birth. |
| Interventions | In phase I |
| Outcomes | Sepsis (symptoms compatible with infection and a positive blood culture for bacteria or fungi obtained at least 96 hours after birth and before 120 days of life; for commensals the diagnosis required two positive blood cultures obtained no more than 4 days apart). |
| Notes | The following outcomes could be ascertained from this study; sepsis, any serious infection, NEC, death from all causes, death from infection, days in hospital. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Yes | An unbiased coin design was used |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | All lots of IVIG and placebo were marked and recorded by code |
| Blinding? | Yes | Yes/No; This study had two phases; in phase 1a placebo was used but not in phase 2 |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Fanaroff-I 1994
| Methods | Phase I of Fanaroff 1994, placebo-controlled |
|---|---|
| Participants | 1218 infants with BW 501-1500 g and randomized at a mean age of 44 +/- 25 hours after birth. |
| Interventions | In phase I |
| Outcomes | Sepsis (symptoms compatible with infection and a positive blood culture for bacteria or fungi obtained at least 96 hours after birth and before 120 days of life; for commensals the diagnosis required two positive blood cultures obtained no more than 4 days apart). |
| Notes |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | Multicentre, two-phase controlled trial. Phase I was placebo controlled and double-blinded; phase II was not placebo controlled. |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | An unbiased coin design was used |
| Blinding? | Yes | All lots of IVIG and placebo were marked and recorded by code. A placebo was used in phase 1 |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Haque 1986
| Methods | Randomized controlled trial, without the use of a placebo |
|---|---|
| Participants | 150 neonates of 28 to 37 wk GA and less than 4 hours of age. |
| Interventions | 50 neonates received IVIG (Intraglobulin, Biotest Pharma, West Germany) 120 mg/kg within 2-4 hours of birth |
| Outcomes | Sepsis was defined as presence of clinical features and a positive culture of blood or cerebrospinal fluid. |
| Notes | Sepsis, any serious infection, death from all causes and death from infection could be ascertained in this study. One infant developed pneumonia in the control group. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Envelopes were used |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Magny 1991b
| Methods | Multicentre, randomized controlled, double-blind study. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 235 neonates of less than or equal to 32 wk gestation, hospitalised before 25 hours of life and having endotracheal tube and/or umbilical catheter on admission. |
| Interventions | 120 neonates received 500 mg (10 ml) of polyvalent Ig (Biotransfusion, France) on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 17, and 31 of life. |
| Outcomes | Deaths from infection |
| Notes | Deaths from infection could be ascertained in this study. The definition of nosocomial infection did not meet our criteria for sepsis or any serious infection. The number of infants with one or more episodes of NEC could not be ascertained. The 46 infants in which the protocol was broken were maintained in the statistical analyses. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Yes | A randomisation table was prepared by the statistician for each unit |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | The investigators were "blind' |
| Blinding? | Yes | |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | In 46 infants (21 in the IVIG; 25 in the placebo group) irregularities occurred in the protocol (one dose forgotten or no follow-up until 45 days of life because of transfer out of the unit). The data from these 46 infants were maintained for the statistical analysis but were considered separately |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | See "Incomplete outcome data addressed" |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Ratrisawadi 1991
| Methods | Randomized controlled trial, without the use of a placebo group |
|---|---|
| Participants | 68 infants with a BW of 1000 - 1500 g. |
| Interventions | 34 neonates received 250 mg/kg of IVIG (Biotest Pharma, West Germany) within 4 hours of birth |
| Outcomes | Sepsis (presence of clinical findings of sepsis plus positive blood cultures). |
| Notes | The outcomes of sepsis and deaths from all causes could be ascertained in this study. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | Randomized controlled trial, without the use of a placebo group |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear | Blinding of randomization - can't tell |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Unclear | Infants (number not stated) who expired within 24 hours of life or required blood exchange transfusion were excluded from the study. In spite of these exclusions the number of patients in each group is identical (n= 34). |
| Free of selective reporting? | Unclear | See above |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Sandberg 2000
| Methods | Randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 105 infants were randomized into the study. 24 infants (12 in each group) were excluded because of initial serum IgG level > 4 g/L, violation of the study protocol, withdrawal of consent, or intrauterine infection. |
| Interventions | 40 infants mean GA (SD) 27.5 +/- 2.2 wk and mean BW (SD) 1.06 +/- 0.39 kg received 1g/kg (20 ml/kg) of IVIG (Baxter) on study day 0 (< 48 hours of age), day 3, 7, 14, 21. 41 infants, mean GA (SD) 27.7 +/- 2.5 wk, mean BW (SD) 1.13 +/- 0.38 kg received an equal volume of placebo (human albumin 5%). |
| Outcomes | Sepsis (symptoms and positive blood culture). |
| Notes | The outcomes of sepsis, deaths from all causes, and deaths from infections could be ascertained from this study. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Yes | According to Dr. Klara Thiringer randomization was by a computer-generated list for each of the four centres, and infants were allocated by the use of sealed envelopes. |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Infants were allocated by the use of sealed envelopes. |
| Blinding? | Yes | |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | 105 infants were randomized into the study. 24 infants (12 in each group) were excluded because of initial serum IgG level > 4 g/L, violation of the study protocol, withdrawal of consent, or intrauterine infection. |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Spady 1994
| Methods | Randomized double-blind trial |
|---|---|
| Participants | 111 VLBW infants |
| Interventions | 54 infants were given 300 mg/kg of IVIG (name of product not given) as 5% solution, once between 24-72 hours of age and again 72 hours later. |
| Outcomes | The outcome of sepsis was not defined in this abstract, but according to the authors sepsis occurred in 17 infants in the IVIG group and in 15 in the control group. |
| Notes | The length of hospital stay could be ascertained from this study published in abstract form only. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | Published in abstract form only - full quality assessment not possible |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear | See above |
| Blinding? | Unclear | See above |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Unclear | See above |
| Free of selective reporting? | Unclear | See above |
| Free of other bias? | Unclear | See above |
Stabile 1988
| Methods | Single centre, randomized controlled trial without the use of a placebo group. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 94 neonates, GA </= 34 wk gestation, or BW </= 1500 g. |
| Interventions | 0.5 g/kg IVIG (Venogamma Polivalente, Ismunit, Pomezia, Italy) on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th day of life (treatment group) or no intervention (control group) |
| Outcomes | Sepsis was defined as clinical signs of systemic infection and positive blood or CSF culture for a pathogen. |
| Notes | Sepsis, any serious infection, deaths from all causes and deaths from infection could be ascertained from this study. Infants that died and were excluded by the authors are included in our analysis. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear | Infants were randomly assigned |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | No | Complete follow-up - no 14 neonates were excluded from the analysis. 6 neonates in the treatment group were excluded; 3 underwent exchange transfusion, 2 died from severe respiratory distress syndrome and one had suspected prenatal infection. 8 control neonates were excluded; 2 underwent exchange transfusion, 3 died of severe respiratory distress syndrome, one died of respiratory distress syndrome and IVH, and two had suspected prenatal infection. |
| Free of selective reporting? | No | No; see comments above |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Tanzer 1997
| Methods | Single centre, quasi-randomized trial without the use of a placebo. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 80 preterm neonates. Single centre, Turkey. Dates for the study period not provided. |
| Interventions | 40 infants with a mean (SE) GA of 36.18 (0.17) wk, mean (SE) BW of 1.85 (0.07) kg were given 500 mg/kg of IVIG (Sandoglobulin R) if they were weighing greater than 1500 g, and 700 mg/kg if they were weighing < 1500 at birth on days one, two and eight of life. |
| Outcomes | Blood culture proven sepsis, mortality from any cause, sepsis related mortality, days in hospital. Serum IgG levels were measured on days 1, 2, 8 and 12. |
| Notes | Sepsis, deaths from all causes could be ascertained from this study. No adverse effects were noted. The outcome of days in hospital was only reported for the control group. Treatment with IVIG resulted in a statistically significant increase in the serum IgG concentrations. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | No | Infants were divided into two groups on the basis of order of admission |
| Allocation concealment? | No | Allocation was known based on order of admission |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Outcomes reported on all enrolled infants |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Van Overmeire 1993
| Methods | Randomized controlled trial without the use of a placebo group. |
|---|---|
| Participants | 116 neonates of < 32 wk GA and <1500 g BW. |
| Interventions | 56 neonates received 500 mg IVIG (Sandoglobulin) in 10 ml of saline over a period of 30 min within the first 12 h of life. This infusion was repeated every 24 h until the 7th day of life, then administered weekly for another 3 weeks. 60 neonates received no placebo or other intervention |
| Outcomes | The diagnosis of any serious infection was made when the clinical diagnosis, in association with suggestive laboratory data, was confirmed by a positive blood or CSF culture. |
| Notes | Any serious infection, hospital stay and death from all causes could be ascertained in this study. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Allocation was by means of envelopes |
| Blinding? | No | No placebo was used |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Unclear | Complete follow-up - yes |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | Outcomes reported for all randomized infants |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Weisman 1994a
| Methods | Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Participants | 753 neonates with a BW of 500 to 2000 g, GA </= 34 wk, postnatal age </= 12 hours |
| Interventions | 372 neonates received a single intravenous infusion of 10 ml/kg of IVIG (500 mg/kg) (Sandoglobulin) |
| Outcomes | All outcomes were recorded during the first 8 weeks (56 days) of life |
| Notes | Sepsis, any serious infection, NEC, and death from infection could be ascertained from this study. Although the outcomes of IVH and BPD were well defined, figures for these outcomes were not reported by group. |
Risk of bias table
| Item | Judgement | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | No information provided |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | Blinding of randomization - yes; albumin was used as placebo |
| Blinding? | Yes | Blinding of intervention - yes |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Yes | Complete follow-up |
| Free of selective reporting? | Yes | After enrolment it was determined that 9 patients (5 received albumin and 4 IVIG) did not meet the entry criteria, and for 10 patients (5 received albumin and 5 received IVIG) the protocol was violated during the study, but all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. |
| Free of other bias? | Yes | Appears free of other bias |
Abbreviations:
BW = birth weight
g = gram
GA = gestational age
IgG = immunoglobulin
i.v. = intravenous(ly)
IVIG = intravenous immunoglobulin
kg = kilogram
LBW = low birth weight (< 2.5kg)
mg = miligram
SEM = standard error of the mean
SD = standard deviation
Characteristics of excluded studies
Acunas 1994
| Reason for exclusion | This is an RCT comparing the effect of fresh frozen plasma or gammaglobulin on humoral immunity in neonatal sepsis. This study did not meet the inclusion criteria as a randomized untreated control group was not included. A non-randomized concurrent group of infants without suspicion of infection and matched for age, birth weight, and gestational age served as a control group. |
|---|
Adhikari 1996
| Reason for exclusion | This is a double-blind placebo-controlled RCT assessing the efficacy of prophylactic use of IVIG in 21 pairs of ventilated neonates weighing more than 1500 g. The mean weight in the IVIG group was 2702 g and in the placebo group 2679 g; thus most neonates did not full fill the entry criterion of a weight < 2500 g. In this study IVIG did not significantly reduce the rate of infection, the duration of ventilation or the time to clinical recovery. |
|---|
Kacet 1991
| Reason for exclusion | The authors do not provide enough information regarding definitions of outcomes for inclusion in this systematic review. |
|---|
Kinney 1991
| Reason for exclusion | This is a double-blind RCT designed to determine whether IVIG administration modifies the incidence of infections in high-risk neonates. 170 infants were enrolled. The study population included neonates of > 1500 g birth weight with no upper limit stated by the authors. This study did thus not meet our inclusion criteria. The authors "found no evidence that the administration of IVIG affected parameters that might be related to the occurrence of systematic or localized infectious processes". |
|---|
Lelik 2004
| Reason for exclusion | This is a randomized controlled trial but the infants enrolled were > 38 weeks gestation and weighed > 2500 g and therefore the study population did not fulfil our inclusion criteria |
|---|
Malik 1990
| Reason for exclusion | This study has been published in abstract form only, and the authors do not provide enough information regarding definitions of outcomes for inclusion in this systematic review. |
|---|
Monintja 1989
| Reason for exclusion | Immunoglobulin was given intra-muscularly. It is unclear whether this is an RCT. Sepsis was not clearly defined. |
|---|
References to studies
Included studies
Atici 1996
Atici A, Satar M, Karabay A, Yilimaz M. Intravenous immunoglobulin for prophylaxis of nosocomial sepsis. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 1996;63:517-21.
Baker 1992
Baker CJ, Melish ME, Hall RT, et al. Intravenous immune globulin for the prevention of nosocomial infection in low-birth-weight neonates. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;327:213-9.
Bussel 1990a
Bussel JB. Intravenous gammaglobulin in the prophylaxis of late sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1990;12:S457-62.
Chirico 1987
Chirico G, Rondini G, Plebani A, Chiara A, Massa M, Ugazio AG. Intravenous gammaglobulin therapy for prophylaxis of infection in high-risk neonates. Journal of Pediatrics 1987;110:437-42.
Chou 1998
Chou Y-H, Yau K-I T. The use of prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in very low birthweight infants. Chang Gung Medical Journal 1998;21:371-6.
Christensen 1989
Christensen RD, Hardman T, Thornton J, Hill HR. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of the safety of intravenous immune globulin administration to preterm neonates. Journal of Perinatology 1989;9:126-30.
Clapp 1989
Clapp DW, Kliegman RM, Baley JE, et al. Use of intravenously administered immune globulin to prevent nosocomial sepsis in low birth weight infants: report of a pilot study. Journal of Pediatrics 1989;115:973-8.
Conway 1990
Conway SP, Ng PC, Howel D, Maclain B, Gooi HC. Prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin in pre-term infants: a controlled trial. Vox Sanguinis 1990;59:6-11.
Didato 1988
Didato MA, Gioeli R, Priolisi A. The use of intravenous gamma-globulin for prevention of sepsis in pre-term infants. Helvetica Paediatrica Acta 1988;43:283-94.
Fanaroff 1994
Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, et al. A controlled trial of intravenous immune globulin to reduce nosocomial infections in very-low-birth-weight infants. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;330:1107-13.
Haque 1986
Haque KN, Zaidi MH, Haque SK, Bahakim H, El-Hazmi M, El-Swailam M. Intravenous immunoglobulin for prevention of sepsis in preterm and low birth weight infants. Pediatric Infectious Disease 1986;5:622-5.
Magny 1991b
Magny JF, Bremard-Oury C, Brault D, Menguy C, Voyer M, Landais P, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for prevention of infection in high-risk premature infants: report of a multicenter, double-blind study. 1991;88:437-43.
Ratrisawadi 1991
Ratrisawadi V, Srisuwanporn T, Puapondh Y. Intravenous immunoglobulin prophylaxis for infection in very low birth-weight infants. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 1991;74:14-8.
Sandberg 2000
Sandberg K, Fasth A, Berger A, Eibl M, Isacson K, Lisebka A, Pollak A, Tessin I, Thiringer K. Preterm infants with low immunoglobulin G levels have increased risk of neonatal sepsis but do not benefit from prophylactic immunoglobulin G. Journal of Pediatrics 2000;137:623-8.
Spady 1994
Spady DW, Pabst HF, Byrnes P. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) shortens stay for low birth weight infants [abstract]. Pediatr Research 1994;35:304A.
Stabile 1988
Stabile A, Sopo SM, Romanelli V, Pastore M, Pesaresi MA. Intravenous immunoglobulin for prophylaxis of neonatal sepsis in premature infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1988;63:441-3.
Tanzer 1997
Tanzer F, Yazar N, Hakgudener Y, Kafali G. Intravenous immunoglobulin for sepsis prevention in preterm infants. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 1997;39:341-5.
Excluded studies
Acunas 1994
Acunas BA, Peakman M, Liossis G, et al. Effect of fresh frozen plasma and gammaglobulin on humoral immunity in neonatal sepsis. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1994;70:F182-7.
Adhikari 1996
Adhikari M, Wesley AG, Fourie PB. Intravenous immunoglobulin prophylaxis in neonates on artificial ventilation. South African Medical Journal 1996;86:542-5.
Kacet 1991
Kacet N, Gremillet C, Zaoui C, et al. Prevention of late-onset infections in preterm infants with intravenous gamma-globulin: a randomized clinical trial [abstract ]. European Journal of Pediatrics 1991;150:604.
Kinney 1991
Kinney J, Mundorf L, Gleason C, et al. Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intravenous immune globulin administration to high-risk neonates. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1991;145:1233-8.
Lelik 2004
Lelik MP, Efanova EA. Prevention of nosocomial infections in newborns at artificial lung ventilation. Anesteziologiia i Reanimatologiia 2004;May-June(3):41-3.
Studies awaiting classification
Metsvaht 2001
Published data only (unpublished sought but not used)
Metsvaht T. A study was performed in Estonia on IgM-enriched IVIG (Pentaglobin) in the prevention of infection in neonates. The study included 20 neonates in the treatment group (IVIG) and 20 neonates (control group). The results have not been published yet.
Other references
Additional references
Baker 1990a
Baker CJ. New uses of intravenous immune globulin in newborn infants. Journal of Clinical Immunology 1990;10:47S-55S.
Baker 1990b
Baker CJ, Rench MA, Noya FJD, Garcia-Prats JA, and the Neonatal IVIG Study Group. Role of intravenous immunoglobulin in prevention of late-onset infection in low-birth-weight neonates. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1990;12:S463-9.
Baley 1988
Baley JE. Neonatal sepsis: the potential for immunotherapy. Clinics in Perinatology 1988;15:755-71.
Baley 1992
Baley JE, Fanaroff AA. Neonatal infections. Part 2: Specific infectious diseases and therapies. In: Sinclair J and Bracken MB, editor(s). Effective care of the newborn infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:496-506.
Bell 1978
Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Annals of Surgery 1978;187:1-7.
Berger 1991
Berger M. Use of intravenously administered immune globulin in newborn infants: prophylaxis, treatment, both, or neither. Journal of Pediatrics 1991;118:557-9.
Bortolussi 1986a
Bortolussi R, Fischer GW. Opsonic and protective activity of immunoglobulin, modified immunoglobulin, and serum against neonatal Escherichia coli K1 infection. Pediatric Research 1986;20:175-8.
Bortolussi 1986b
Bortolussi R. Potential for intravenous gamma-globulin use in neonatal gram-negative infection: an overview. Pediatric Infectious Diseases 1986;5:S198-200.
Bussel 1990b
Bussel JB. Neonatal uses of intravenous immunoglobulin. American Journal of Pediatric Hematol/Oncology 1990;12:505-9.
Consensus 1997
Consensus Working Group. Present and future uses of IVIG: a Canadian multidisciplinary consensus-building initiative. Canadian Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1997;2:176-208.
Fischer 1986
Fischer GW, Hemming VG, Hunter KW, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neonatal sepsis: therapeutic strategies and laboratory studies. Pediatric Infectious Disease 1986;5:S171-5.
Fischer 1988
Fischer GW. Therapeutic uses of intravenous gammaglobulin for pediatric infections. Pediatric Clinics of North America 1988;35:517-33.
Fischer 1990a
Fischer GW, Weisman LE. Therapeutic intervention of clinical sepsis with intravenous immunoglobulin, white blood cells and antibiotics. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1990;73 Suppl:17-21.
Fischer 1990b
Fischer GW, Hemming VG, Gloser HP, Bachmyer H, von Pilar CE, Wilson SR, Baron PA. Polyvalent group B streptococcal immune globulin for intravenous administration: overview. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1990;12:S483-91.
Fischer 1990c
Fischer GW. Immunoglobulin therapy for neonatal sepsis: an overview of animal and clinical studies. Journal of Clinical Immunology 1990;10:40S-6S.
Gonzalez 1989
Gonzalez LA, Hill HR. The current status of intravenous gamma-globulin use in neonates. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1989;8:315-22.
Hammarstrom 1990
Hammarstrom L, Smith CIE. The use of intravenous IgG as prophylaxis and for treatment of infections. Infection 1990;18:314-24.
Haque 1992
Haque KH. Does the commercial type of IVIG used make a difference? Pediatrics 1992;89:806-7.
Hill 1993
Hill HR. Intravenous immunoglobulin use in the neonate: role in prophylaxis and therapy of infection. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1993;12:549-59.
Hill 1991a
Hill RH. Is prophylaxis of neonates with intravenous immunoglobulin beneficial. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1991;145:1229-30.
Hill 1991b
Hill HR. The role of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment and prevention of neonatal bacterial infection. Seminars in Perinatology 1991;15:41-6.
Hobbs 1967
Hobbs JR, Davis JA. Serum IgG-globulin levels and gestational age in premature babies. Lancet 1967;I:757-9.
Irani 1991
Irani SF, Wagle SU, Deshpande PG. Role of intravenous immunoglobulin in prevention and treatment of neonatal infection. Indian Pediatrics 1991;28:443-9.
Jenson 1997
Jenson HB, Pollock BH. Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of intravenous immune globulin for prevention and treatment of neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics 1997;99:e2.
Johnston 1990
Johnston RB. Immunotherapy and immunoprophylaxis in the newborn infant: the need for definitive trials. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1990;12:S392-3.
Kliegman 1990
Kliegman RM, Clapp DW, Berger M. Targeted immunoglobulin therapy for the prevention of neonatal infections. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1990;12:S443-56.
Kliegman 1991
Kliegman RM, Clapp DW. Rational principles for immunoglobulin prophylaxis and therapy for neonatal infections. Clinics in Perinatology 1991;18:303-324.
Kyllonen 1989
Kyllonen KS, Clapp W, Kliegman RM, Baley JE, Shenker N, Fanaroff AA, Berger M. Dosage of intravenously administered immune globulin and dosing interval required to maintain target levels of immunoglobulin G in low birth weight infants. Journal of Pediatrics 1989;115:1013-6.
Lacy 1995
Lacy JB, Ohlsson A. Administration of intravenous immunoglobulins for prophylaxis or treatment of infection in preterm infants: meta-analyses. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1995;72:F151-5.
Magny 1991a
Magny J-F. Les immunoglobulines sont-elles utiles dans le traitment des infections neonatales? La Revue du Praticien 1991;41:1368-70.
Noya 1989
Noya FJD, Baker CJ. Intravenously administered immune globulin for premature infants: a time to wait. Journal of Pediatrics 1989;115:969-71.
Papile 1983
Papile LA, Munsick-Bruno G, Schafer A. Relationship of cerebral intraventricular hemorrhage and early childhood neurologic handicaps. Journal of Pediatrics 1983;103:273-7.
Rondini 1991
Rondini G, Chirico G, Ugazio AG. Intravenous immunoglobulin for prophylaxis of infection in preterm infants. Developmental Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1991;17:144-9.
Salzer 1991
Salzer HR, Weninger M, Pollak A, Kolmer M. Prophylactic immunoglobulin (IG) treatment in infants less than 30 weeks gestation - a metaanalysis [abstract]. European Journal of Pediatrics 1991;150:604.
Siber 1992
Siber GR. Immune globulin to prevent nosocomial infections. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;327:269-71.
Stabile 1989
Stabile A, Sopo SM, Pastore M, Pesaresi MA. Intravenous immune globulin doses and infection prophylaxis in very low birth weight neonates. Journal of Pediatrics 1989;114:168.
Stiehm 1966
Stiehm RE, Fudenberg HH. Serum levels of immune globulins in health and disease: a survey. Pediatrics 1966;37:715-27.
Stiehm 1986
Stiehm ER. Intravenous immunoglobulins in neonates and infants: an overview. Pediatric Infectious Disease 1986;5:S217-9.
Stiehm 1990
Stiehm ER. Role of immunoglobulin therapy in neonatal infections: where we stand today. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1990;12:S439-42.
Stoll 1996
Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Journal of Pediatrics 1996;129:63-71.
Weisman 1986
Weisman LE, Fischer GW, Hemming VG, Peck CC. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous immunoglobulin (Sandoglobulin) in neonates. Pediatric Infectious Disease 1986;5:S185-8.
Weisman 1992
Weisman LE, Cruess DF, Fischer GW. Current status of intravenous immunoglobulin in preventing or treating neonatal bacterial infections. Clinical Reviews in Allergy 1992;10:13-28.
Weisman 1993
Weisman LE, Cruess DF, Fischer GW. Standard versus hyperimmune immunoglobulin in preventing or treating neonatal bacterial infections. Clinics in Perinatology 1993;20:211-24.
Weisman 1994b
Weisman LE, Cruess DF, Fischer GW. Opsonic activity of commercially available standard intravenous immunoglobulin preparations. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1994;13:1122-5.
Other published versions of this review
Ohlsson 1998
Ohlsson A, Lacy JB. Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000361. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000361 .
Ohlsson 2001
Ohlsson A, Lacy JB. Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000361. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000361 .
Data and analyses
1 IVIG vs placebo or no treatment
| Outcome or Subgroup | Studies | Participants | Statistical Method | Effect Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Sepsis, one or more episodes | 10 | 3975 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.85 [0.74, 0.98] |
| 1.2 Any serious infection, one or more episodes | 16 | 4986 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.82 [0.74, 0.92] |
| 1.3 NEC, one or more episodes | 7 | 4081 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.08 [0.89, 1.32] |
| 1.4 Mortality (all causes) | 15 | 4125 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.89 [0.75, 1.05] |
| 1.5 Mortality (infectious) | 10 | 1690 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.83 [0.56, 1.22] |
| 1.6 Duration of hospitalization | 8 | 3562 | Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) | -2.12 [-4.54, 0.30] |
| 1.7 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia | 2 | 176 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.55 [0.85, 2.84] |
| 1.8 Intraventricular haemorrhage any grade | 4 | 3176 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.02 [0.88, 1.19] |
| 1.9 Intraventricular haemorrhage grade 3 or 4 | 2 | 3000 | Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.01 [0.85, 1.21] |
Sources of support
Internal sources
- Department of Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
External sources
- No sources of support provided
This review is published as a Cochrane review in The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2010 (see http://www.thecochranelibrary.com for information). Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback. The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review. |




