Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures

Authors

Bonnie Stevens1, Janet Yamada2, Arne Ohlsson3

Background - Methods - Results - Characteristics of Included Studies - References - Data Tables and Graphs


1Associate Chief of Nursing Research, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
2Nursing, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
3Departments of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Citation example: Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub3.

Contact person

Janet Yamada

Nursing
The Hospital for Sick Children
555 University Avenue
Toronto Ontario M5G 1X8
Canada

E-mail: janet.yamada@sickkids.ca

Dates

Assessed as Up-to-date:25 August 2009
Date of Search:01 April 2009
Next Stage Expected:25 August 2011
Protocol First Published:Issue 2, 1998
Review First Published:Issue 2, 1998
Last Citation Issue:Issue 1, 2010

What's new

Date / EventDescription
26 October 2009
New citation: conclusions not changed

Update

25 August 2009
Updated

This updates the review "Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures" published in The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004 (Stevens 2004).

For the purpose of the current updated review, the inclusion criteria were expanded to include all minor painful procedures (rather than heel lance and venipuncture only). The updated review criteria included studies that assessed the efficacy of repeated doses of sucrose. Twenty-three new studies were added in the current update.

History

Date / EventDescription
03 February 2008
Amended

Converted to new review format.

20 April 2004
New citation: conclusions changed

Substantive amendment

Abstract

Background

Administration of oral sucrose with and without non-nutritive sucking is frequently used as a non-pharmacological intervention for procedural pain relief in neonates.

Objectives

To determine the efficacy, effect of dose and safety of oral sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates.

Search methods

The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Collaborative Review Group were used.

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials in which term and/or preterm neonates (postnatal age maximum of 28 days corrected for postmenstrual age) received sucrose for procedural pain. Control conditions included water, pacifier, positioning/containing or breastfeeding.

Data collection and analysis

The main outcome measures were physiological and/or behavioural pain indicators and/or composite pain scores. A weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed effects model was reported for continuous outcome measures.

Results

Forty-four studies enrolling 3,496 infants were included. Results from only a few studies could be combined in meta-analyses. Sucrose significantly reduced duration of total crying time (seconds) [WMD -39.26 (95% CI -44.29, -34.24), 88 neonates], but did not reduce duration of first cry (seconds) during heel lance [WMD -8.99 (95% CI -20.07, 2.10), 192 neonates]. No significant differences were found for percent change in heart rate from baseline at one minute [WMD 0.90 (95% CI -5.81, 7.61), 86 neonates] and three minutes [WMD -6.20 (95% CI -15.27, 2.88), 86 neonates] post-heel lance, or for mean heart rate at three minutes post-heel lance [WMD -0.98 (95% CI -8.29, 6.32), 154 neonates]. Oxygen saturation (%) was significantly lower in infants given sucrose during ROP examination compared to controls [WMD -2.58 (95% CI -4.94, - 0.23), 62 neonates]. Infants given sucrose post-heel lance had significantly lower PIPP scores at 30 seconds [WMD -1.64 (95% CI -2.47, - 0.81), 220 neonates] and 60 seconds [WMD -2.05 (95% CI -3.08, -1.02), 195 neonates]. For ROP exams, sucrose did not significantly reduce PIPP scores [WMD -0.65 (95% CI -1.88, 0.59), 82 neonates]. There were no differences in adverse effects between sucrose and control groups.

Authors' conclusions

Sucrose is safe and effective for reducing procedural pain from single events. An optimal dose could not be identified due to inconsistency in effective sucrose dosage among studies.

Further investigation on repeated administration of sucrose in neonates and the use of sucrose in combination with other non-pharmacological (e.g. behavioural, physical) and pharmacologic interventions is needed. Sucrose use in extremely low birth-weight and unstable and/or ventilated neonates needs to be addressed.

Plain language summary

Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures

 

Sucrose (sugar) provides pain relief for newborn babies having painful events such as needles or heel pricks. Newborn babies undergoing these events need strategies to reduce their pain. Pain medicine is usually given for major painful events (such as surgery) but may not be given for more minor events (such as taking blood or needles). Pain medicine can be used to reduce pain but there are several other methods including sucking on a pacifier with or without sucrose. Researchers have found that giving sucrose to babies decreases their crying time and behaviours such as grimacing. More research is needed to determine if giving repeated doses of sucrose is safe and effective, especially for very low birth weight infants or infants on respirators.

Background

Description of the condition

Management of pain for neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is less than optimal (AAP 2000; Anand 2001; Carbajal 2008). Although strategies to manage pain from surgery, medical illness, and major procedures exist, means to prevent or reduce pain from diagnostic procedures including heel lance and venipuncture have until relatively recently been lacking (Fernandes 1994; Johnston 1997b; Anand 2007).

Description of the intervention

In recent years, administration of sucrose with or without non-nutritive sucking (NNS) (e.g. pacifiers) has been a frequently studied intervention for relief of procedural pain in neonates. Sucrose has been examined for its calming effects in crying newborns (Barr 1993; Barr 1994; Haynes 1995; Smith 1992) and its pain-relieving effects for invasive procedures in term and preterm neonates (Stevens 1997a).

How the intervention might work

The effects of sucrose and non-nutritive sucking are thought to be mediated by both endogenous opioid and non-opioid systems (Blass 1994) but the underlying mechanisms may differ. These mechanisms may be additive or synergistic but most likely depend on normal functioning of central mechanisms. In a systematic review/meta-analysis of the efficacy of sucrose for procedural pain management, Stevens et al (Stevens 1997a) found that the proportion of time crying was decreased with 0.24 to 0.48 g (i.e. 2 ml of a 12% to 24% sucrose solution) administered orally two minutes prior to a painful procedure (e.g. heel lance or venipuncture).

Why it is important to do this review

This systematic review is a substantive update of the original 1998 Cochrane review and the updates completed in 2001 and 2004 (Stevens 1998; Stevens 2001;Stevens 2004).

Objectives

To determine the efficacy, effect of dose, method of administration and safety of sucrose for relieving procedural pain as assessed by physiological [heart rate, respiratory rate, saturation of peripheral oxygen in the blood (SpO2), transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide (gas exchange measured across the skin - TcpO2, TcpCO2)] and/or behavioural pain indicators (cry duration, proportion time crying, facial actions) and/or composite pain scores.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the effect of sucrose analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures were considered for this review. Only published studies were included. Language restrictions were not imposed. Studies published in abstract form were not included.

In this update, our inclusion criteria were broadened to include RCTs in which the efficacy of sucrose was assessed during all minor painful procedures (i.e. other than heel lance and venipuncture) as well as after repeated doses of sucrose.

Types of participants

We included studies assessing term and/or preterm neonates with maximum postnatal age of 28 days after reaching 40 weeks postmenstrual age.

Types of interventions

Interventions included administration of sucrose via oral syringe, dropper or pacifier for treatment of procedural pain. For this update of the review inclusion criteria were extended to all studies that used sucrose as an intervention for any acute painful procedure including subcutaneous injections, circumcision, bladder catheterizations and eye exams for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Control group conditions include breastfeeding, breast milk or milk formula water (sterile, tap, distilled, spring), pacifier, positioning/containing or no treatment.

Types of outcome measures

Outcome measures for inclusion were individual behavioural (cry duration, proportion of time crying, facial actions) and/or physiological (heart rate, respiratory rate, SpO2, TcpO2, TcpCO2, cortisol levels) pain indicators and/or composite pain scores (including a combination of behavioural, physiological and contextual indicators) and any adverse effects reported.

Search methods for identification of studies

Electronic searches

Standard methods as per the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. Electronic searches were carried out for relevant RCTs in MEDLINE (1950 to April 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), CINAHL (1982 to April 2009) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library) (All EBM Reviews - Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE, CCTR, CMR, HTA, and NHSEED). Key words and MeSH terms included infant/newborn/neonate, pain and sucrose.

Searching other resources

Bibliographies, the most recent relevant neonatal and pain journals, and recent major paediatric pain conference proceedings were searched manually. Personal files were searched. Unpublished studies were not included and additional information from published studies was obtained if needed. Identified abstracts are listed under excluded studies. Language restrictions were not imposed.

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies

Abstracts were not included as we have identified discrepancies in numbers enrolled between abstracts and final publications (Walia 1999). The types of participants were more clearly defined to include maximum postnatal age of 28 days after reaching 40 weeks postmenstrual age. As sucrose has become more widely evaluated as an analgesic for a variety of different acute painful procedures, we no longer limited our search to those studies evaluating pain due to heel lance and venipuncture.

Data extraction and management

Methods to collect data from the included trials: two review authors extracted data separately. These were compared and differences were resolved. Additional data were provided by investigators in four studies (Allen 1996; Johnston 1999a; Stevens 1999; Harrison 2003).

Assessment of risk of bias in included studies

The methodological quality of each study was assessed independently by four review authors, who were not blinded to trial authors or institutions.

The following issues were evaluated and entered into the Risk of Bias table:

1. Sequence generation: was the allocation sequence adequately generated? 

2. Allocation concealment: was allocation adequately concealed? 

3. Blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors: was knowledge of the allocated intervention adequately prevented during the study? At study entry? At the time of outcome assessment? 

4. Incomplete outcome data: were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? 

5. Selective outcome reporting: are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting? 

6. Other sources of bias: was the study apparently free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias?

Measures of treatment effect

Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager software. Categorical data were analyzed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and the number needed to treat (NNT). Continuous data were analyzed using weighted mean difference (WMD). The 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was reported on all estimates.

Assessment of heterogeneity

We examined heterogeneity between trials by inspecting the forest plots and quantified the impact of heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. If we detected statistical heterogeneity, we explored the possible causes (for example, differences in study quality, participants, intervention regimens, or outcome assessments) using post hoc sub group analyses.

Data synthesis

The statistical package (RevMan 5.0) provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used. For meta-analyses, a weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed effects model was reported for continuous outcome measures.

Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity

Separate comparisons were made for different painful procedures (heel lance, venipuncture, ROP exam, bladder catheterization, nasogastric (NG) tube insertion, circumcision, subcutaneous injections) and for multiple exposures to sucrose.

Results

Description of studies

The previous review of ‘Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures’ included 21 studies (Stevens 2004). For the purpose of the current updated review, the inclusion criteria were expanded to include all minor painful procedures (rather than heel lance and venipuncture only). The updated review criteria included studies that assessed the efficacy of repeated doses of sucrose.

A total of 41 studies were identified for possible inclusion in this current update. Four studies were excluded based on the postnatal age of the infant (Barr 1995; Curtis 2007; Ramenghi 2002; Reis 2003). Twelve additional studies were excluded (See Table - Characteristics of Excluded Studies) for the following reasons: five studies were not fully randomized (Blass 2001; Efe 2007; Razmus 2004; Mohan 1998; Yoon 2001); one study was not a randomized trial (Taddio 2000); two studies did not measure pain intensity as an outcome (Fernandez 2003; Johnston 2002); and one study used sucrose as standard of care and not as an intervention (Vederhus 2006). In one study, infants did not receive a painful procedure (Taddio 2003) and one study did not involve the use of sucrose (Barbier 1994). Finally, one study (Taddio 2009) involved a population subset of a study previously published .

Two trials are currently awaiting classification. One study was published in a journal which we were unable to retrieve (Singh 2001). It was unclear whether one study (Akman 2002) was randomized.  The authors were contacted for clarification of trial methodology. These studies are currently awaiting classification until a response is received. If possible, these studies will be included in a future update.

In total, 23 studies were added in the current update (Allen 1996; Blass 1997; Boyer 2004; Boyle 2006; Codipietro 2008; Gal 2005; Gaspardo 2008; Grabska 2005; Harrison 2003; Herschel 1998; Kaufman 2002; Mathai 2006; McCullough 2008; Mitchell 2004; Mucignat 2004; Ogawa 2005; Okan 2007; Rogers 2006; Rush 2005; Stang 1997; Stevens 2005; Taddio 2008; Unceta-Barranechea 2008).

Included Studies

A total of 44 studies (3,496 infants) are included in this systematic review. Of these studies, 22 focused on term infants (Allen 1996; Blass 1997; Blass 1999; Carbajal 1999; Codipietro 2008Gormally 2001; Greenberg 2002; Guala 2001; Haouari 1995; Herschel 1998; Isik 2000a; Kaufman 2002; Mathai 2006; Ogawa 2005; Ors 1999; Overgaard 1999; Ramenghi 1996b; Rogers 2006; Rushforth 1993; Stang 1997; Taddio 2008; Unceta-Barranechea 2008), 20 included preterm infants (Abad 1996; Acharya 2004; Boyer 2004; Boyle 2006; Bucher 1995; Gal 2005; Gaspardo 2008; Grabska 2005; Johnston 1997a; Johnston 1999a; McCullough 2008; Mitchell 2004; Mucignat 2004; Okan 2007; Ramenghi 1996a;Ramenghi 1999; Rush 2005; Stevens 1999; Stevens 2005; Storm 2002)  and two included both preterm and term infants (Gibbins 2002; Harrison 2003). Details of each study are outlined in the table – Characteristics of Included Studies.

Painful Procedures

Heel lance was the most predominant painful procedure, studied in 26 trials (Blass 1997; Blass 1999; Bucher 1995; Codipietro 2008; Gaspardo 2008; Gibbins 2002; Gormally 2001; Greenberg 2002; Guala 2001; Haouari 1995; Harrison 2003; Isik 2000a; Mathai 2006;Ors 1999; Overgaard 1999; Ramenghi 1996b; Rushforth 1993; Johnston 1997a; Johnston 1999a; Okan 2007; Ramenghi 1996a; Ramenghi 1999; Stevens 1999; Stevens 2005; Storm 2002; Unceta-Barranechea 2008). Five studies involved infants undergoing an exam for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (Boyle 2006; Gal 2005; Grabska 2005; Mitchell 2004; Rush 2005). In three studies, infants were observed during a venipuncture (Abad 1996; Acharya 2004; Carbajal 1999) and one study involved both heel lance and venipuncture (Ogawa 2005). In two studies, infants were assessed during subcutaneous injections (Allen 1996; Mucignat 2004) and in another study  (Boyer 2004) all painful procedures were assessed. Taddio 2008 assessed infants during a combination of intramuscular injections, venipunctures and heel lances. Three studies involved circumcision (Herschel 1998 ; Kaufman 2002; Stang 1997), one study involved the effectiveness of sucrose for pain during bladder catheterizations (Rogers 2006), and one study assessed sucrose analgesia during NG tube insertion (McCullough 2008).

Outcome Measures

Cry behaviour was assessed in 30 studies. In 25 studies, the effect of sucrose on changes in heart rate/vagal tone was evaluated. Oxygen saturation was reported in 15 studies (Abad 1996; Acharya 2004; Bucher 1995; Codipietro 2008; Gal 2005; Grabska 2005; Harrison 2003; Herschel 1998; Johnston 1997a; Mathai 2006; McCullough 2008; Mucignat 2004; Okan 2007; Overgaard 1999; Rush 2005). Respiratory rate was measured in five of these studies (Abad 1996; Bucher 1995; Grabska 2005; Okan 2007; Rush 2005) and in one study, TcpO2 and TcpCO2 were reported (Bucher 1995). In one study, the intensity of sucking in infants who received sucrose was compared to those who received water (Ramenghi 1996a). Facial grimacing in infants was reported in two studies (Blass 1999; Kaufman 2002).

Unidimensional and multidimensional behavioural pain measures were reported in 16 studies, while composite pain measures were used in 11 studies. Of the studies that evaluated pain intensity using composite pain measures, 10 used the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP; Stevens 1996) (Boyle 2006; Codipietro 2008; Gal 2005; Gibbins 2002; Grabska 2005; Johnston 1999a; Mitchell 2004; Stevens 1999; Stevens 2005; Taddio 2008).

In 12 studies, adverse effects were evaluated. In five of these studies, minor adverse effects were observed

Risk of bias in included studies

Twenty-one studies (48%) reported that the allocation sequence was adequately generated. In 23 studies (52%), allocation was adequately concealed. Blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors was adequately prevented in 35 studies (79%). In these studies we reported whether sucrose, water solutions and outcomes were blinded. Incomplete outcome data were adequately addressed in 39 studies (89%).

Few researchers provided a definition of pain or how it was conceptualized in relation to the outcomes. There were differences in study methods. Heel lance was studied as the pain stimulus in the majority of studies. However, little detail about this procedure (e.g. manual versus automated lance) was provided. Therefore, it is impossible to know if the painful stimuli were comparable in intensity, duration or frequency across studies. The length of infant observation following the heel lance was infrequently reported and may have implications for the incidence of reported adverse effects.

The delivery method of sucrose differed between studies (syringe, dropper or sucrose dipped pacifier). Outcomes were reported inconsistently; as means with SD or SE, medians with ranges and often in graphic form without reporting numerical data.

Effects of interventions

Inconsistencies in outcome measures and differences in the statistical reporting of results existed across studies, preventing the use of comprehensive meta-analytic techniques. In this review update there were no categorical data reported that could be used in a meta-analyses. The results were reported by painful procedure for each accepted study separately. Descriptions of the outcomes for each are presented in the Additional Tables 01 to 09 (Table 1; Table 2; Table 3; Table 4; Table 5; Table 6; Table 7; Table 8; Table 9).

Effectiveness of Sucrose for Heel Lance

1. Cry behaviour

Sucrose significantly reduced crying time in 18 studies evaluating pain at heel lance (Blass 1997; Blass 1999; Bucher 1995; Codipietro 2008; Gormally 2001; Greenberg 2002; Harrison 2003; Haouari 1995; Isik 2000a; Ogawa 2005; Okan 2007; Ors 1999; Overgaard 1999; Ramenghi 1996a; Ramenghi 1996b; Ramenghi 1999; Storm 2002; Unceta-Barranechea 2008).

Significant reductions in crying during the first three minutes following heel lance were found in groups receiving low concentrations (2 ml of 12% sucrose) (Blass 1997; Blass 1999; Greenberg 2002) as well as higher concentrations (2 ml of 50%) of sucrose solution (Ramenghi 1996b).

In a study of 101 term infants who received 1 ml of 25% sucrose solution compared to breastfeeding, Codipietro 2008 reported a statistically significant reduction in the median duration of first cry (p = 0.004), percent crying during heel lance (p = 0.0003) and percent crying in the first two minutes after heel lance (p < 0.001) in favour of breastfeeding.

A meta-analysis was performed for three studies (Harrison 2003; Mathai 2006; Ogawa 2005) (N = 192 infants) where the mean duration of first cry (seconds) with heel lance was assessed (Figure 1). Using a fixed effects approach, no significant heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 0%). Duration of cry was not significantly reduced in infants who were administered sucrose (dose range 2 ml of 12.5% to 2 ml of 50% sucrose) compared to the control groups [WMD -8.99 (95% CI -20.07, 2.10)]. When combining two studies (Isik 2000a; Mathai 2006) (N = 88) that evaluated total crying time (seconds), there was substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). Mean duration of cry was significantly reduced in infants who received sucrose (dose range 2 ml of 20 to 30% sucrose), [WMD -39.26 (95% CI -44.29, -34.24)] (Figure 2).

2. Quality of Sucking

One study evaluated the quality of sucking as an outcome measure. Ramenghi 1996b reported that the quality of sucking was significantly more intense in infants who received 1 ml of 25% (0.25g) sucrose compared to those in the control group (p = 0.04) during and after heel lance.

3. Grimace

Blass 1999 evaluated grimacing in term infants undergoing heel lance. In this study, the proportion of time grimacing was significantly reduced in infants who received 2 ml of 12% (0.24g) sucrose alone compared with water (p = 0.0003) , as well as infants in the sucrose with pacifier group compared to water alone (p = 0.001) and pacifier alone (p = 0.04) groups.

4. Physiologic Outcomes

In eight studies, sucrose significantly reduced heart rate or vagal tone at heel lance (Blass 1999; Bucher 1995; Codipietro 2008; Gormally 2001; Haouari 1995; Okan 2007; Ors 1999; Ramenghi 1996b).

When results for change in heart rate were pooled for two studies involving heel lances (Haouari 1995; Isik 2000a) (N = 86 infants), statistically significant heterogeneity (I2 = 86%) was found between the studies at one minute after heel lance (Figure 3) and no heterogeneity (I2 = 0) between the studies at three minutes after heel lance (Figure 4). There were no significant differences in percent change in heart rate for infants given sucrose (dose range 0.5 g to 0.6 g) compared to the control group at one minute [WMD 0.90 (95% CI -5.81, 7.61)] and three minutes [WMD -6.20 (95% CI -15.27, 2.88)] after heel lance. The results for two additional studies (Guala 2001; Harrison 2003) (N = 154 infants) were combined for heart rate at three minutes post-heel lance and no heterogeneity was found (I2 = 0) between the studies. The overall effect of sucrose was not significant [WMD -0.98 (95% CI -8.29, 6.32)] (Figure 5).

Findings differed in two studies where vagal tone was assessed (Gormally 2001; Greenberg 2002). Gormally 2001 reported no significant main effects of sucrose whereas Greenberg 2002 found a lower vagal tone during heel lance in the sucrose dipped pacifier group compared to the control group (p = 0.008) and the oral sucrose group (p = 0.018). The sucrose-coated pacifier group had a lower vagal tone index than the control group at heel lance (p = 0.019).

Of the six studies where the effects of sucrose on oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rates were assessed at heel lance, there were no significant differences between groups in five studies (Bucher 1995; Harrison 2003; Mathai 2006; Okan 2007;Overgaard 1999). Codipietro 2008 reported that infants who received 1 ml of a 25% sucrose solution had a median decrease in oxygen saturation levels from baseline to 30 seconds after the start of a heel lance that was significantly greater [-3 (-30 to 1)] compared to the breastfeeding group [-1 (-14 to 2)] (p = 0.001).

Only Greenberg 2002 measured salivary cortisol levels as markers of pain/ stress in infants during heel lance. There were no significant differences between treatment and control groups in cortisol levels.

5. Unidimensional and Multidimensional Pain Measures

In eight of 10 studies utilizing uni-dimensional pain scales to assess pain at heel lance, sucrose was statistically favoured when measuring pain with the Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) (Gaspardo 2008; Harrison 2003; Johnston 1997a; Ogawa 2005; Okan 2007), modified NFCS (Unceta-Barranechea 2008), and a pain scale using four facial expressions and the presence of cry (Ramenghi 1996a; Ramenghi 1996b; Ramenghi 1999). In one study using a multidimensional pain scale, the Douler Aigue Du Nouveau-ne (DAN) (Mathai 2006), sucrose was also statistically favoured.

In one study (Gormally 2001) using pain concatenation scores for facial activity pre-heel lance, and at one, two and three minutes post-heel lance, there was no significant effect of sucrose reported (test of main effect F[1,65] 0.17, p = 0.68).

6. Composite pain measures

Five of six studies assessing pain intensity with composite measures at heel lance used the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) (Codipietro 2008; Gibbins 2002; Johnston 1999a; Stevens 1999; Stevens 2005). The PIPP is a validated pain measure that includes behavioural (three facial expressions), physiological (heart rate and oxygen saturation) and contextual (gestational age and behavioural state) indicators (Stevens 1996). Sucrose doses in these studies ranged from 0.05 ml to 2 ml of a 24% or 25% solution. In all five studies, sucrose significantly reduced PIPP scores.

When PIPP scores were pooled across three studies involving heel lances (Gibbins 2002; Johnston 1999a; Stevens 1999), no statistically significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) was found. PIPP scores were significantly reduced in infants who received sucrose (dose range 0.012 g to 0.12 g) compared to the control group at 30 seconds [WMD -1.64 (95% CI -2.47, - 0.81)] (N = 220 infants) and 60 seconds [WMD -2.05 (95% CI -3.08, -1.02)] (N = 195) after heel lance (Figure 6; Figure 7).

Overgaard 1999 used the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS), which is composed of behavioural and physiologic indicators, to assess pain intensity in infants receiving 2 ml of 50% sucrose. Significantly lower NIPS scores were reported in infants who received sucrose compared to those who received water (p < 0.05).

Effectiveness of Sucrose for ROP Exams

1. Cry Behaviours

Grabska 2005 and Rush 2005 assessed the effect of administering 24% sucrose on cry behaviour during ROP exams. Grabska 2005 adjusted sucrose doses by the weight of the infants, while Rush 2005 administered pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose. In both studies, no significant differences in cry behaviour were found between treatment and control groups.

2. Physiological Outcomes

Two studies assessed changes in heart rate during and after ROP exams (Grabska 2005; Rush 2005). There were no significant differences between sucrose and control groups in either study.

In three studies, SpO2 was measured during and after ROP exams (Gal 2005; Grabska 2005; Rush 2005). Only Grabska 2005 found significant differences in SpO2 between sucrose and control groups during the exam; however, the differences were not significant at two minutes after the exam.

Results from two studies (Grabska 2005; Rush 2005) (N = 62) measuring SpO2 during ROP exams were pooled (Figure 8). No statistically significant heterogeneity was found between the studies (I2 = 0%). 24% sucrose was adjusted by weight in one study (Grabska 2005) and administered on a pacifier dipped in sucrose in another study (Rush 2005). Oxygen saturation was significantly reduced in infants given sucrose compared to the control group [WMD -2.58 (95% CI -4.94, -0.23)].

3. Composite Pain Measures

Four of the five studies assessing pain during and after ROP exams used the PIPP as an outcome measure (Boyle 2006; Gal 2005; Grabska 2005; Mitchell 2004). Boyle 2006 and Grabska 2005 found no significant difference between sucrose and control groups regarding PIPP scores. Gal 2005 and Mitchell 2004 found that sucrose significantly reduced PIPP scores during ROP exams (p = 0.001 and 0.0077, respectively), but the analgesic effects were not sustained after the examination.

PIPP scores were pooled in two studies (N = 52) where infants who received either water or sucrose (24 to 33%) via syringe prior to ROP exams were observed (Boyle 2006; Grabska 2005). There was no heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 0%) and the overall effect of sucrose was not significant [WMD -0.65 (95% CI -1.88, 0.59)].

Effectiveness of Sucrose for Venipuncture

1. Cry Behaviours

Cry duration was assessed at venipuncture in three studies (Abad 1996; Acharya 2004; Ogawa 2005); Abad 1996 and Acharya 2004 reported that sucrose significantly reduced cry duration (p < 0.05 and < 0.001, respectively). In the study by Ogawa 2005, there were no significant differences in sucrose and control groups for infants undergoing venipuncture.

2. Physiological Outcomes

In two studies, HR during and after venipuncture was evaluated as an outcome measure (Abad 1996; Acharya 2004). Both studies reported a significant reduction in HR in groups receiving 2 ml of 12% to 25% sucrose up to five minutes post-venipuncture. However, in Abad 1996, groups receiving 2 ml of 12% sucrose had lower HR than those receiving 2 ml of 24% sucrose or water.

Three studies assessed SpO2 during and after venipuncture (Abad 1996; Acharya 2004; Rush 2005). All studies reported no significant differences between sucrose and control groups.

3. Unidimensional and Multidimensional Pain Measures

The NFCS was used in two studies (Abad 1996; Ogawa 2005), and the DAN was used in one study (Carbajal 1999) evaluating pain at venipuncture. Two studies reported that 2 ml of 25% sucrose (Abad 1996) or 2 ml of  30% sucrose with or without pacifier (Carbajal 1999) significantly reduced pain score. Ogawa 2005 did not find any significant differences between sucrose and control groups.

Effectiveness of Sucrose for Bladder Catheterization

1. Crying Behaviours

Rogers 2006 examined the use of 24% sucrose for bladder catheterization and found that a subgroup of infants (1 to 30 days of age) who received sucrose were significantly less likely to cry during maximal catheterization insertion compared to infants who received water (29% vs. 78%, p = 0.008). Infants older than 30 days did not show significant differences in crying when given sucrose versus water.

2. Multidimensional Pain Measures

In the same study by Rogers 2006, groups receiving 2 ml of 24% sucrose had significantly lower DAN scores than groups receiving water.

Effectiveness of Sucrose for Circumcision

1. Crying Behaviours

Kaufman 2002 assessed infants who were given a pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose as an adjunct therapy for circumcision pain for two different circumcision clamping methods (Gomco and Mogen). The cumulative crying time in the Gomco-sucrose group was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) than the Gomco-water group (53 seconds vs. 86 seconds, p = 0.0001).

2. Grimace

Kaufman 2002 observed the time spent grimacing by infants undergoing circumcision by two different clamping methods (Gomco and Mogen). A significant reduction in grimacing was found in the Gomco-sucrose group compared to the Gomco-water group (p = 0.0001).

3. Physiological Outcomes

When Herschel 1998 administered pacifiers dipped in 50% sucrose for circumcision, HRs were significantly higher by 10 to15 beats per minute in the control group compared to the sucrose group (p < 0.03) during dorsal clamping of the foreskin using the Gomco method. Herschel 1998 also reported that the use of pacifiers dipped in 50% sucrose resulted in lower changes in baseline SpO2 compared to the control group (p = 0.05); however, this difference was not clinically significant.

Stang 1997 measured plasma cortisol levels a marker of pain/stress in infants during circumcision. No significant differences between treatment and control groups in cortisol levels were reported.

Effectiveness of Sucrose for Subcutaneous Injections

1. Crying Behaviours

Crying time was significantly lowered (p = 0.002) in a study of infants who were administered a combination of EMLA, sucrose and pacifier compared to groups who were given a pacifier alone, pacifier and EMLA, and pacifier and sucrose for subcutaneous injections (Mucignat 2004). Another study assessing pain during subcutaneous injections found that 2 ml of 12% sucrose significantly reduced crying time compared to water and no treatment (p < 0.01 for both comparisons) (Allen 1996).

2. Physiological Outcomes

Mucignat 2004 did not find a significant difference in HR between treatment and control groups. In the same study, SpO2 during subcutaneous injections in the pacifier only group was significantly lower than infants who were given 0.5 ml of a 30% sucrose solution plus pacifier, EMLA plus pacifier, and sucrose plus EMLA and pacifier (p = 0.02).

3. Unidimensional and Multidimensional Pain Measures

Mucignat 2004 found significant results for the effectiveness of sucrose during subcutaneous injection using both the DAN and NFCS scales, however, p-values were not reported.

Effectiveness of Sucrose for NG-tube Insertion

1. Physiological Outcomes

One study assessed pain during and after NG-tube insertion. McCullough 2008 reported no significant differences in HR and SpO2 between sucrose and water groups during and after NG-tube insertion.

2. Unidimensional and Multidimensional Pain Measures

In the same study (McCullough 2008), the NFCS was used to assess pain during NG-tube insertion; 0.5 to 2 ml of 24% sucrose (dose administered according to weight) was reported to significantly reduce NFCS scores compared to sterile water (p = 0.004).

Adverse Effects

Twelve studies (Acharya 2004; Carbajal 1999; Codipietro 2008; Gal 2005; Gibbins 2002; Guala 2001; Grabska 2005; McCullough 2008; Ramenghi 1996a; Rogers 2006; Stevens 1999; Stevens 2005; Taddio 2008) evaluated adverse effects of sucrose compared to placebo. Five of these studies (Gibbins 2002; Grabska 2005 ;McCullough 2008; Stevens 2005; Taddio 2008) observed minor side effects in infants. Gibbins 2002 described minor adverse effects in six infants, none of which occurred in the sucrose with pacifier group. One neonate who received water with pacifier choked when administered the water and stabilized within 10 seconds. Three infants randomized to the sucrose group and two infants randomized to the water with pacifier groups experienced oxygen desaturation when the study intervention was administered. Each neonate recovered spontaneously with no medical interventions required. Grabska 2005 confirmed choking and oxygen desaturation as possible adverse effects of administering sucrose for pain. McCullough 2008 reported that there was no significant difference between the sucrose and control groups regarding adverse effects; the investigators observed brief apnoea or self-limiting bradycardia in some infants, but none required clinical intervention. Stevens 2005 reported that the adverse events related to repeated use of sucrose over the first 28 days of life were "low" and all immediate adverse events resolved spontaneously. Taddio 2008 reported no significant differences between groups in blood glucose levels monitored during the study as well as the incidence of spitting up the sucrose solution.

Repeated Doses of Sucrose

Repeated dosing of sucrose was addressed in five studies (Boyer 2004; Gaspardo 2008; Mucignat 2004; Stevens 2005; Taddio 2008). Boyer 2004 studied infants who received 0.1 to 0.3 ml of 24% sucrose or sterile water for every painful procedure over the first week of life. No significant differences were found in salivary cortisol levels in infants who received sucrose compared to sterile water. Gaspardo 2008 assessed 17 preterm infants receiving 0.5 ml/kg of 25% sucrose prior to every minor painful procedure over a period of four days. Infants in the sucrose group had significantly less facial expressions than the control group (N = 16) on the second and third assessment days and less crying on the second, third and fourth day of assessment compared to the control group. The authors concluded that sucrose was efficacious and safe when administered over a three day period. Mucignat 2004 reported that in 33 preterm infants who received 265 subcutaneous injections of erythropoietin over a six week period, that the use of 0.2 to 0.5 ml of 30% sucrose solution with pacifier and EMLA was more effective than each of the interventions alone. Stevens 2005 reported that administration of 24% sucrose for all painful procedures over the first 28 days of life was more effective compared to standard care (positioning and swaddling) in preterm infants. Taddio 2008 studied newborns of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers who received 2 ml of 24% sucrose for intramuscular injection of vitamin K, venipunctures for newborn screening tests and the first three heel lances for glucose testing. Sucrose was found to be effective during venipunctures only when compared to control groups.

Discussion

In this systematic review update that included 23 new studies, the efficacy of sucrose analgesia was assessed on a broad range of painful procedures undertaken on infants hospitalized in the NICU including heel lance, venipuncture, bladder catheterization, circumcision, ophthalmology examination, NG-tube insertion, and subcutaneous injection.

The strength of the studies reviewed was in the study design. Most studies were carefully planned prospective RCTs with a control group and one or more treatment interventions. Several studies were excluded as the method of allocation and/or the number of infants in each condition (intervention group) were not clearly stated. Attempts were made to decrease heterogeneity in meta-analyses by pooling studies that were similar in terms of type of painful procedure and volume and concentration of solution used. Within and between-study variability is inherent in the performance of a painful procedure. Other sources of heterogeneity might include volume and concentration of the solution administered, neonatal age and methodological differences across studies. Subgroup analysis to explore heterogeneity was not performed as there were too few studies to conduct such analyses.

Sucrose was effective in reducing cry behaviours, grimacing, vagal tone, and uni-dimensional, multidimensional and composite pain scores during heel lance in volumes and concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 2 ml of 12% to 50% solution. Some effectiveness of sucrose administration was evident during venipuncture with respect to reducing HR.The effectiveness of sucrose use for ROP exams is less clear. In fact, oxygen saturation was reduced as a result of sucrose administration during ROP exams. For other painful procedures such as bladder catheterization, subcutaneous injections, N/G tube insertions and circumcision, there were few studies and conflicting results. For procedures of longer duration such as ROP exams, bladder catheterization, N/G tube insertions and circumcision, multiple doses of sucrose or sucrose combined with other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may be required to achieve an effect. Some support exists for the use of repeated doses of sucrose for painful procedures within the first several days of life up to the first seven weeks of life; however, further studies are required to determine which procedures and at what concentration and dose would be effective on repeated occasions.

Cry remains the most widely used indicator for pain intensity in infants, followed by changes in heart rate and oxygen saturation. The NFCS and DAN were the most commonly used validated unidimensional and multidimensional behavioural pain assessment measures (respectively), while the PIPP was the most frequently used composite (including physiologic, behavioural, and contextual indicators) measure. The wide variety of outcome measures and differences in the timing of outcome assessments precluded inclusion of most studies in meta-analyses.  Meta-analyses resulted in statistically significant reductions in crying but also oxygen saturation (which is a negative result); however, these results should be interpreted with caution as there was significant heterogeneity between studies (crying) or the combined sample in the treatment and control groups was small (oxygen saturation).

In our previous reviews (Stevens 2001; Stevens 2004), we reported inconsistency in effective sucrose dosage, although a dose range of 0.012 g to 0.12 g was identified. Johnston 1997a and Stevens 1999 identified that very small volumes of 24% sucrose (estimated at 0.01g to 0.02 g) significantly reduced pain. However, in the meta-analyses by Stevens (Stevens 1997a), 0.18 g of sucrose was ineffective in reducing crying and did not differ from the control solution (water). Doses of 0.24 g or greater were most effective; there was some additional benefit of administering 0.48 g to 0.50 g sucrose, but effectiveness did not increase when sucrose doses greater than 0.50 g were administered. In this updated review, there was a significant reduction in PIPP scores using sucrose doses 0.012 g to 0.12 g (0.05 ml to 0.5 ml of 24% sucrose solution) at 30 and 60 seconds after heel lance and 0.12 g (0.5 ml) prior to ROP exams. In these studies, there was a 1 to 2 point reduction in the PIPP score. Shah 2004 report that clinicians and researchers consider a 20% reduction in pain as the minimal clinically important difference, although other researchers suggest a 10% reduction may suffice for this difference (Powell 2001).  Lemyre 2006 used a three point reduction on the PIPP scale as being clinically meaningful. Determining the level of clinical improvement is challenging to measure in infants, given their inability to self report their pain and what level if improvement could truly make significant differences either in treatment strategy or the affective component of pain (i.e. how bad pain makes you feel).  Only minor adverse events that resolved spontaneously have been reported (Gibbins 2002).

The greatest analgesic effect occurs when sucrose is administered approximately two minutes before the painful stimulus. This interval is thought to coincide with the release of endogenous opioids (Blass 1994). Johnston 1999a reported increased analgesia when sucrose solution was repeatedly administered in small aliquots (i.e. 0.05 ml of 24% sucrose) at two minute intervals. The peak effect appears to occur at two minutes and lasts approximately four minutes; therefore, the analgesic effect may wear off if procedures are prolonged. Factors such as the infant’s postnatal age may influence the effectiveness of sucrose (Taddio 2008).

Adverse effects of sucrose were evaluated in 12 studies. In the study that most carefully observed for adverse events (Gibbins 2002), only six infants (3%) experienced minor side effects (e.g. oxygen desaturation, choking) which resolved spontaneously without intervention. It is not clear whether investigators in other studies carefully monitored for adverse effects and for how long. Reporting on the incidence of any adverse effects of single or repeated administration of sucrose needs to be undertaken in both term and preterm infants. Willis 1977 reported over 30 years ago that frequent (8 to12 times per day) small volumes (0.5 to1 ml) of 20% sucrose concentration (mixed with calcium lactate and given 20 minutes prior to gavage feeding) could contribute to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in very low birth weight infants. Since the sample size and methodologic rigor of this study was limited, specific attention to the efficacy and safety of sucrose administration in extremely-low birth-weight preterm infants needs to be further investigated.

Stevens 2005 found no significant differences in incidence rates for NEC between infants who received repeated doses of sucrose over 28 days of life compared to control groups. Johnston 2002 studied 107 preterm infants less than 31 weeks postmenstrual age where 1 ml of 24% sucrose or sterile water was administered to infants up to three times, two minutes apart, for all painful procedures over a seven day period. Johnston indicated that higher frequency of sucrose doses was predictive of lower awareness, orientation, motor development and vigor at 36 weeks, and lower motor development and vigor at 40 weeks. At two weeks postnatal age, a higher number of doses of sucrose was predictive of higher NBRS scores. Proposed explanations were that: (a) low neurodevelopmental scores could be related to infants receiving sucrose during the one week study period only, and ongoing exposure to painful procedures might have resulted in heightened sensitivity to pain; or (b) the sample size was inadequate to identify other explanatory variables. However, on further analysis of these data, 10 or fewer doses of sucrose over a 24 hour period were less likely to be related to poorer neurodevelopmental scores (Johnston 2007). Stevens 2005 reported no statistically significant differences between sucrose plus pacifier, water plus pacifier, or the standard care group on neurobiological risk status outcomes.

Generally, infants in this review were healthy and very few were less than 27 weeks gestational age at birth. Although the preterm infant's pain response is generally consistent with that of the term infant, it is often more subtle, less sustained and affected by the infant's behavioural state and severity of illness (Gibbins 2007). There was no significant difference found in this systematic review between the cry outcomes in term and preterm infants; however, the incidence of crying following painful stimuli is reported to be 50% less in preterm infants compared to term infants (Stevens 1994); therefore, cry is questioned as a reliable indicator of pain in the preterm infant population and is precluded as an indicator in many validated infant pain measures.

Few researchers provided a definition or conceptualization of pain in relation to the outcomes. If the reported outcomes reflect the investigators' conceptualization of pain, then we can assume that most investigators considered proportion, percentage, or duration of time crying to be the most valid indicator of pain in neonates. Few investigators used validated pain measures or multidimensional approaches to pain assessment that reflect a more comprehensive conceptualization of pain. Although research on infant cry has delineated certain cry characteristics such as pitch, intensity, melody and harmonics as being good indicators of pain, these were not assessed in the sucrose studies reviewed. Cry duration may give some indication of distress. However, cry duration does not necessarily confirm or deny that the infant is in pain. For unstable and ventilated infants who do not cry following painful procedures, cry may be an inappropriate outcome. Attempts at cry or a silent cry in ventilated infants may be more reasonable to consider. A multivariate approach or composite pain score would be a more valid approach (Stevens 1997c).

The majority of researchers studied heel lance as the painful procedure. However, little detail about this procedure (e.g. type of lancet used, number of attempts, number of squeezes, duration of the procedure) was provided. Therefore, it was not possible to determine if the painful stimuli (or painful procedures) were comparable in intensity, duration or frequency between studies. Similarly, details on other procedures (e.g. subcutaneous injections, ROP exams, bladder catheterizations and circumcision) and comforting interventions (e.g. containment, bundling, tucking or positioning) that could provide comfort to the infant and act as co-interventions would be desirable. The length of observation and return to baseline parameters (e.g. heart rate) of infants following the procedures was also not reported frequently.

The delivery method of sucrose varied between studies. Sucrose was delivered by syringe, dropper or pacifier. The pacifier promotes non-nutritive sucking and calming that may contribute to reducing pain-elicited distress (Campos 1994). Blass 1994 suggests that sucking exerts a profound behavioural effect and induces feelings of calm. Other researchers have found that non-nutritive sucking reduces heart rate and metabolic rate, causes infants to self-soothe and elevates the pain threshold. However, contact has not been shown to affect cortisol response, heart rate, vagal tone and oxygen saturation (DiPietro 1994; Gunnar 1992). The calming effects are not sustained following cessation of the contact. This is in contrast to sucrose administration where the effects persist beyond the cessation of contact for several minutes. Blass and Hoffmeyer (Blass 1991) examined the combined effectiveness of sucrose and pacifiers and reported that physiologic and behavioural changes resulted from both sucrose and non-nutritive interventions. Results from this update indicate that the use of sucrose with pacifier appears to have a synergistic effect with both single and repeated doses of sucrose.

Codipietro 2008 concluded that breastfeeding was more effective than sucrose for reducing pain from heel lance in term neonates. Shah 2006 recommended that breastfeeding, when available, should be used to reduce procedural pain in neonates who are exposed to single painful procedures; breast milk alone in small volumes is shown to be as effective as water for the relief of procedural pain (much less so than sucrose), and its effectiveness for repeated painful procedures has not yet been established.

Authors' conclusions

Implications for practice

The results of the 44 studies included in this review provide further evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of sucrose for reducing pain from single and repeated heel lances. Additional studies report the use of sucrose for ROP exams, bladder catheterization, venipuncture, circumcision, NG-tube insertion, and subcutaneous injections in hospitalised neonates; however, further studies for these painful procedures are required due to conflicting evidence on the effect of sucrose in reducing pain. Sucrose reduces procedural pain with minimal to no side effects. Small doses of 24% sucrose (0.01 to 0.02 g) are efficacious in very-low birth-weight infants while larger doses (0.24 to 0.50 g) reduce the proportion of time crying in term infants. A dose range of sucrose for reducing procedural pain in neonates was identified as 0.012 to 0.12 g (0.05 ml to 0.5 ml of 24% solution). This evidence has been integrated into evidence-based sucrose consensus protocols from which guidelines have been developed (Lefrak 2006; Dunbar 2006; Sharek 2006). However, in a recent cross-sectional survey of painful procedures in NICUs, procedural pain was managed using sweet solutions only 3.5% of the time (Carbajal 2008). Our recommendation, based on this review, is that 0.012 to 0.12 g of sucrose should be administered approximately two minutes prior to single heel lances and considered for use with venipunctures for pain relief in neonates. Other methods of pain relief, including non-nutritive sucking, should be considered in combination with sucrose to significantly reduce or eliminate pain in this population. Effective knowledge translation strategies are required to effectively translate research evidence on sucrose into practice (Dunbar 2006). These strategies could include the use of reminders, interactive education of health professionals and regular audit and feedback sessions.

Implications for research

The optimal dose of sucrose for term and preterm infants has not yet been established. Researchers should consider establishing more precise and tailored doses based on context in which it is to be used (e.g. GA of the infant, severity of illness). Optimal sucrose doses could be further assessed using sensitivity/meta-regression techniques. More research is needed addressing the analgesic and calming effects of sucrose and its interaction with other behavioural (e.g. facilitated tucking, kangaroo care) and pharmacologic (e.g. morphine, fentanyl) interventions for more invasive procedures. Strategies need to be initiated to increase understanding of the underlying mechanisms of sucrose and pain relief in infants. The use of repeated administrations of sucrose in neonates needs to be investigated further in terms of clinical, developmental and economic outcomes. 

Investigators embarking on further research should utilize existing evidence to answer questions on efficacy and safety when used with other painful procedures that have been minimally addressed to date (e.g. intravenous starts, lumbar punctures, PICC line insertions, endotracheal intubation, suctioning, chest tube insertions). Strengthened study design and methods are required regarding descriptions of the painful procedures, adequacy of sample size, acknowledgment of a multidimensional conceptualization of pain, use of validated pain measures to determine outcomes, and consideration of variation in the infant's response and context in which the pain is experienced. Use of sucrose in neonates that are extremely-low birth weight, unstable and/or ventilated, as well as older infants up to and including 18 months of age (Harrison 2008) needs to be addressed. Finally, replication of existing studies of high methodological quality and using identical validated outcomes would allow for further combination of results in meta-analyses. Researchers should report on means and standard deviations in addition to medians and ranges if the data are not normally distributed to allow for the use of meta-analytic techniques.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of:
Ms. Moira Lynch for conducting an extensive updated search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database in April of 2001 and Ms.Tamsin Adams-Webber for her assistance with our 2004 and current 2009 update.
Dr. Celeste Johnston, Dr. Aage Knudsen, Dr. Sharyn Gibbins and Dr. Denise Harrison for providing unpublished data.
Dr. Denise Harrison, Jasmine Lamba, Alison Dickson and Sobia Khan for their assistance with quality assessment and data extraction of the studies for this review update.

The Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded in part with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN267200603418C.

Contributions of authors

Bonnie Stevens
Literature search and identification of trials for inclusion
Evaluation of methodologic quality of included trials
Abstraction and meta-analysis of data
Verifying and entering data into RevMan
Writing of text of review

Janet Yamada
Literature search and identification of trials for inclusion
Evaluation of methodologic quality of included trials
Abstraction and meta-analysis of data
Verifying and entering data into RevMan
Writing of text of review

Arne Ohlsson
Literature search and identification of trials for inclusion
Evaluation of methodologic quality of included trials
Abstraction of data
Verifying and entering data into RevMan
Writing of text of review

Declarations of interest

Three review authors (BS, JY, AO) have been involved in trials included in this review.

Differences between protocol and review

For this update of the review inclusion criteria were extended to all studies that used sucrose as an intervention for any acute painful procedure, including subcutaneous injections, circumcision, bladder catheterizations and eye exams for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies

Abad 1996

Methods

Double blind, randomized controlled trial

Participants

28 (29 - 36 weeks gestational age) infants, postnatal age 1-26 days

Interventions

2 ml of 12% sucrose via syringe (n = 8) 2 minutes prior to venipuncture (n = 8).
2 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe (n = 8) 2 min prior to venipuncture (n = 8).
2 ml of spring water via syringe (n = 12) 2 min prior to venipuncture (n = 12).

Outcomes

Oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, heart rate (just before and just after administering the solution and 5 min after venipuncture), time spent in audible crying for three min following venipuncture.

Notes

One-way and two-way ANOVA used to evaluate outcomes
Data were reported as means and standard deviations for the three physiologic outcomes and as medians and interquartile ranges for cry duration. Data were collected at three time points; just before the administration of the solution, just after the solution and 5 minutes after venipuncture.
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Selected from randomization table

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Inteventions and outcomes blinded

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Acharya 2004

Methods

Double blind, randomized controlled cross-over trial

Participants

39 preterm neonates (mean 30.5 weeks gestational age), mean post natal age 27.2 days

Interventions

2 ml of 25% (0.5 g) sucrose (n=39)
2 ml of water (n=39)
Via syringe over 2 minutes into infant's mouth

Outcomes

Rise in heart rate, 02 saturation, duration of first cry, total duration of crying, NFCS at the 3 phases of the venipuncture

Notes

Data were reported using means, standard deviations over the 3 phases of the venipuncture

Adverse effects: were evaluated.

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Selected from random number table

Allocation concealment? Yes

Allocation controlled by hospital pharmacist

Blinding? Yes

Interventions and outcomes blinded

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Allen 1996

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

285 infants between 2 weeks and 18 months old; 50 included in this review (only neonates at 2 weeks of age)

Interventions

2 ml of 12% sucrose (n=16)

2 ml of sterile water (n=15)

No treatment (n=19)

Outcomes

Mean cry duration and percent time crying during and 3 minutes after subcutaneous injection

Notes

Data for percent time crying were presented in graphical form only. Data were requested and obtained directly from the author for this review.

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Yes

Solutions in coded syringes prepared by pharmacist

Blinding? Yes

Yes for sucrose and water; no for the no intervention group

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Unclear

285 infants recruited from a continuous sample. Unsure of the number included in analysis.

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Data was provided to the authors of the sucrose systematic review

Free of other bias? Yes

Blass 1997

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

72 newborn infants (postnatal age between 22 - 40 hours)

Interventions

2 ml of 12% sucrose (n=8)
2 ml of protein solution (provimin) (n=8)
2 ml of lactose (n=8)
2 ml of dilute fat (coconut and soy oil blend) (n=8)
2 ml of concentrated fat (n=8)
2 ml of fat and lactose solution (n=8)
2 ml of Ross Special Formula (RSF) - artificial milk (n=8)
2 ml of Similac (n=8)

Solutions were given via syringe over a 2 min period

Outcomes

Crying time (percentage of procedure time spent crying; percentage of time spent crying during 3 min recovery period; number of infants that cried 20% or more during each recovery minute)

Notes

Sucrose vs. water, Similac vs. water and RSF vs water were compared using Mann-Whitney U statistic. Results were presented in graph form and means were reported in text.
Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? No

Similac group could not be concealed because appearance differed from other intervention solutions

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? No

Results reported incompletely (only in figures) and cannot be combined in meta-analysis

Free of other bias? Unclear

Several test solutions were gifts from Ross Laboratories

Blass 1999

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

40 term newborn infants, 34 - 55 hours old

Interventions

2 ml of 12% sucrose over two minutes via syringe (n=10)
2 ml of water via syringe over 2 minutes (n=10)
Pacifier dipped every 30 seconds in 12% sucrose solution for two minutes (n=10)
Pacifier dipped in water every 30 seconds for two minutes (n=10) prior to heel lance

Outcomes

Percentage of time spent crying 3 minutes after heel lance. Percentage of time spent grimacing, change in mean HR.

Notes

Data were reported in graph forms only
Results of ANOVA reported as p-values only (We have contacted the authors to obtain additional information).
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water alone groups blinded; pacifier+ water, pacifier+ sucrose groups were blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? No

Results reported incompletely (only in figures) and cannot be combined in meta-analysis

Free of other bias? Yes

Boyer 2004

Methods

Double-blind randomized controlled trial (repeated doses of sucrose)

Participants

105 preterm neonates (<31 weeks gestational age), postnatal age ≦ 48 hours

Interventions

0.1 ml of sterile water up to 3 times for each painful procedure
0.1 ml of 24% sucrose up to 3 times for each painful procedure

Intervention was given prior to all painful procedures for a duration of 7 days

Outcomes

Pulse rate (over 1 day), Cortisol level (change in cortisol levels before/after procedure)

Notes

This paper assessed physiological stability over 1 full day of the 7 day study period.

Subset analyses were conducted. Results were reported as means and standard deviations.
Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer generated randomization sequence

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Blinding? Yes

Blinding of intervention - Nurses were aware of the group assignment but treating clinicians were not.
Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? No

Incomplete physiological data for majority of infants but rationale provided

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Boyle 2006

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

40 preterm infants <32 weeks GA

Sterile water group, mean GA=27 weeks, postnatal age mean= 45 days
Sucrose group, mean GA=29 weeks, postnatal age mean=43 days
Water + pacifier group, mean GA=30 weeks, postnatal age mean=41 days
Sucrose + pacifier group, mean GA=29 weeks, postnatal age mean=42 days

Interventions

Two minutes before start of eye exam:
1 ml of sterile water (n=10)
1 ml of sucrose 33% (n=10)
1 ml of sterile water + pacifier (n=9)
1 ml sucrose 33% + pacifier (n=11)
*water or sucrose was given by mouth using a syringe

Outcomes

Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) during eye examination

Notes

Data were presented in graph form and reported as means and standard deviations.
Results of ANOVA and independent t-tests reported as p-values

Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described.

Allocation concealment? Yes

Sealed opaque envelopes.

Blinding? Yes

Yes as sucrose and water alone groups blinded; pacifier+ water, pacifier+ sucrose groups were blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Bucher 1995

Methods

Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled cross over trial

Participants

16 preterm infants (27 - 34 weeks gestational age), postnatal age approximately 42 days

Interventions

2 ml of 50% sucrose via syringe into the mouth 2 minutes before heel lance
2 ml of distilled water via syringe into the mouth 2 minutes before heel lance
(n = 16, cross over design)

Outcomes

Increase in HR (bpm); Recovery time for HR (sec); recovery time for respirations (sec); crying (percent of total intervention); recovery time until crying stopped (sec); TcpO2 (max increase -kPa); TcpO2 (max decrease -kPa); TcpO2 (difference between baseline and 10 minutes after end of intervention -kPa); TcpCO2 (max decrease -kPa); TcpCO2 (difference between baseline and 10 min after the end of intervention).

Notes

Results were presented in graph forms without mean values and standard deviations and/or in tables with medians with interquartile ranges. Wilcoxon signed rank test
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Sequence generated from random number table

Allocation concealment? Yes

Vials containing solutions were coded and contents could not be identified

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Carbajal 1999

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

150 term newborn infants, 3-4 days old

Interventions

No treatment (n = 25)
2 ml of sterile water via syringe over 30 seconds (n = 25)
2 ml of 30% glucose via syringe (n = 25)
2 ml of 30% sucrose (n = 25)
Pacifier alone (n = 25) 2 minutes prior to venipuncture
2 ml of 30% sucrose via syringe followed by sucking a pacifier (n = 25)

Outcomes

Douleur Aigue du Nouveau-ne (DAN) scale

Notes

Mann-Whitney U test used to evaluate pain scores
Adverse effects: were evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Sequence generated by random number table

Allocation concealment? Yes

Allocated by sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Codipietro 2008

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

51 term infants, mean GA 39.3(1.2) in breastfeeding group; GA 39.4(1.1) in sucrose group

Interventions

1 ml of 25% sucrose (n=50)

Breastfeeding (n=51)

Outcomes

PIPP during blood sampling, 2 min after heel lance

HR increase from baselines at 30 seconds following commencement of procedure

02 sat decrease

Duration of first cry, % crying time in first 2 minutes, and % in crying time during blood sampling

Notes

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer generated sequence created by statistician and masked to investigators

Allocation concealment? Yes

Sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes

Blinding? No

Breastfeeding could not be blinded. Nurses and parents not blinded to assignment

Only assistants listening to voice recordings of cry for PIPP scoring were blind to intervention

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Gal 2005

Methods

Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study

Participants

23 preterm infants mean gestational age 26.4 weeks (range 24-29 weeks), postnatal ages 28-93 days

Interventions

2 ml of sterile water via syringe (n=23)
2 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe (n=23)

Mydriatic eye drops (Phenylephrine HCl 1%, cyclopentolate HCl 0.2%) and local anaesthetic eye drops (proparacaine HCl 0.5%: 2 drops) were given to both groups prior to exam.

Outcomes

PIPP score at 5 min and 1 min pre-exam
PIPP score at eye speculum insertion
PIPP score 1 min and 5 min post-exam

Notes

Results were reported in means and standard deviations
Results of paired t-tests were reported as p-values

Adverse events: were evaluated-no adverse events experienced due to sucrose administration

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Dice roll used to allocate to 6 groups

Allocation concealment? Yes

Allocation centrally controlled by pharmacist

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Stopped at 23 neonates due to change in ophthalmologist in order to maintain consistency in examinations, however, statistical power calculated determined that 24 neonates were needed for the study. This does not seem to affect the results.

Gaspardo 2008

Methods

Randomized double-blind controlled trial

Participants

33 preterm infants, median gestational age of 30 weeks

Interventions

0.5 ml/kg of 25% sucrose before every minor painful procedure (venipuncture, arterial puncture, heel-lance, intravenous cannulation, endotracheal tube introduction, endotracheal tube suctioning, gavage insertion for feeding, removal of electrode leads and tape) (n=17)

0.5 ml/kg of sterile water (n=16)

Outcomes

Incidence of cry (% neonates crying)

Heart Rate (% neonates with HR greater than or equal to 160 bpm)

NFCS (% neonates with score greater than or equal to 3)

Activated Behavioural State (% neonates with score greater than or equal to 4)

Notes

Pain was assessed over a period of 4 days during morning blood collection (heel lance)

On day 1, no treatment was given to any neonate in order to collect baseline data. Solutions were administered to neonates before every painful procedure (listed above) on days 2 to 4.

The Mann-Whitney U Test was used to calculate the difference between sucrose and water groups for continuous variables. The X2 Test was used to calculate the difference between sucrose and water groups for categorical variables.

No means or standard deviations reported.

Adverse events: were assessed

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer generated randomization sequence

Allocation concealment? Yes

Solutions prepared by pharmacist called "A" or "B" to keep identity from investigators. Coordinator kept identities of solutions in sealed and opaque envelopes until after analysis.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Gibbins 2002

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

190 preterm and term infants, mean gestational age of 33.7 weeks, under 7 days postnatal age

Interventions

0.5 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe to the anterior surface of the tongue followed by pacifier (n=64)
0.5 ml 24% sucrose without pacifier (n=62)
0.5 ml sterile water with pacifier (n=64)
2 minutes prior to heel lance

Outcomes

Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) at 30 and 60 seconds after heel lance

Notes

One-way ANOVA to evaluate mean pain scores
Results were reported as means and standard deviations
Adverse effects: were evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Sequence generated using a centralized randomization table

Allocation concealment? Yes

Centrally allocated by pharmacist. Pharmacist labelled all solutions as "study drug" and delivered it to neonate's bedside.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Facial coders were uninformed as to the purpose of the study, phases of the heel lance and group allocation for the 2 pacifier groups

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Gormally 2001

Methods

Randomized controlled trial, factorial design

Participants

94 normally developing newborns, mean gestational age 39.4 weeks on 2nd or 3rd day of life
Nine infants did not complete the study due to early discharge, nurse or testing room unavailability to obtain heel stick, infant removed from study prior to start date, technical difficulties.

Interventions

No holding and sterile water given by pipette (n=21)
No holding and 0.25 ml of 24% sucrose solution (0.06 g) given by pipette (n=22)
Holding and sterile water given by pipette (n=20)
Holding and 0.25 ml of 24% sucrose solution (0.06 g) by pipette (n=22)
All solutions given 3 times at 30 second intervals

Outcomes

Percentage of time crying
Pain concatenation scores for facial activity
Mean heart rate
Mean vagal tone index
Measurements at pre intervention, 1, 2, and 3 minutes after heel lance

Notes

Factorial ANOVA to assess effects on behavioural and physiological measures
No means or standard deviations reported
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Facial coders were blind to solution assignment only.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Grabska 2005

Methods

Prospective randomized, blinded, placebo controlled study

Participants

32 preterm infants with birth weight less than 1.5 kg or gestational age under 28 weeks
Mean gestational age =28 wk +/- 1.6, mean postnatal age = 50.8 +/- 20.3 days

Interventions

Sterile water (n=16)
24% sucrose (n=16)

Dose was adjusted by weight:

<1 kg = 0.5cm3 (0.12 g)
1 -1.5 kg = 1.0cm3 (0.24 g)
1.5 -2 kg = 1.5cm3 (0.36 g)
>2 kg = 2.0cm3 (0.48 g)

Outcomes

HR, RR and oxygen saturation at baseline, post-mydriatic, post-study drug, during eye exam, post eye exam
PIPP at  baseline, during eye exam, post eye exam
Crying time during eye exam
Blood pressure at baseline, post-mydriatics, during eye exam and post-eye exam

Notes

Results were reported as means and standard deviations.
Results of t-tests and ANOVAs were reported as p-values where a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant

Adverse events: were evaluated-choking, transient 02 desaturation

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Yes

Pharmacy provided solutions in sealed envelopes after randomization

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Although not explicitly stated, it can be inferred that nurses administering solutions and those assessing videotapes were blinded to assigned solution.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Greenberg 2002

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

84 term newborns, approximately 17-19 hours old.

Interventions

Sugar coated pacifier held in infant's mouth pre procedure to 3 minutes post procedure (n=21)
Water moistened pacifier (n=21)
2 ml of 12% sucrose via syringe into side of infant's mouth (n =21)
Routine care (n=21)

Outcomes

Salivary cortisol levels
Duration of cry
Vagal tone

Notes

Analysis using MANOVA to evaluate outcomes by groups
Results were presented in graph forms without mean values and standard deviations
Adverse effects: were not evaluated.

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? No

Use of pacifier precluded blinding.  No blinding between pacifier groups either, as one was moistened with water and one dipped in sugar packet.

No blinding of outcome measurement

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Guala 2001

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

140 term (38-41 weeks gestational age)

Interventions

Nothing (n=20)
Water (n = 20)
5% Glucose (n = 20)
33% Glucose (n = 20)
50% Glucose (n = 20)
33% Sucrose (n = 20)
50% Sucrose (n = 20)
via syringe into infant's mouth over 30 seconds

Outcomes

Heart rate before, during and 3 minutes after heel lance

Notes

ANOVA to evaluate heart rate across groups at each phase of the heel lance. Means and SD provided
Adverse effects: were evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Sequence generated by random number table

Allocation concealment? Yes

Allocated by sealed opaque envelopes

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Haouari 1995

Methods

Randomized, double blind placebo controlled trial

Participants

60 term (37-42 weeks gestation) infants. 1 - 6 days of age.

Interventions

2 ml of 12.5% sucrose 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)
2 ml of 25% sucrose 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)
2 ml of 50 % sucrose 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)
2 ml of sterile water 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)
All solutions were given by syringe on the tongue over less than one minute

Outcomes

Total time (seconds) crying over three minutes following heel lance
Time of first cry (seconds) following heel lance
Per cent change in heart rate after heel lance (at 1 min, 3 min and 5 min)

Notes

Analysis of non-parametric data was by the Mann-Whitney U test or a trend test. Total time crying in the first three minutes after heel lance was reported as medians and interquartile ranges. Changes in heart rate were expressed in means and standard deviations as a percentage of resting heart rate.
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Yes

Pre-prepared solutions in coded bottles

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Harrison 2003

Methods

Randomized, blinded, controlled trial

Participants

Our sample was a subset of a larger study (n=128) that included older infants

Authors provided us with data for a subset of infants that fulfilled our inclusion criteria.

The subset included 99 hospitalised infants

Mean (SD) gestational age of placebo group=36.7 weeks (3.3)
Mean (SD) gestational age of treatment group=36.8 weeks (3.7)

Interventions

1 ml of water 2 min prior to heel lance (n=46)
1 ml of 25% sucrose 2 min prior to heel lance (n=53)

*For infants weighing 1500g or less the does was reduced to 0.5 ml

Outcomes

NFCS at baseline, upon heel lance, during heel squeeze and completion of heel squeeze at 1 min, 2 min and 3 min of recovery

Duration of cry until 5 second pause, percentage of crying time during heel lance and squeeze, percentage of crying time during 3 min recovery period

Heart rate and O2 saturation

Notes

Results were presented in graphs.
Results of Student's t-test, Pearson's Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test were reported as p-values.

Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer generated randomization sequence

Allocation concealment? Yes

Pharmacy-prepared solutions in consecutively numbered syringes. Contents of syringes obscured.   

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

NNS with pacifier was provided as comfort measure if part of regular infant care. This was addressed by the authors and adjusted analyses were performed to assess the affect of pacifier across groups.

Herschel 1998

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

119 full term male neonates undergoing circumcision, gestational age 38 weeks or more, postnatal age 12 hours or more

Interventions

No treatment (n=40)
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) - 0.8 ml of 1% lidocaine (n=40)
Pacifier dipped in and packed with gauze soaked in 50% sucrose (n=39)

Outcomes

Heart rate and oxygen saturation (change from baseline and means for each interval of circumcision)

Notes

Results of change in heart rate and oxygen saturation for each group was reported as mean and SD. Mean heart rates for each interval of circumcision was graphed.

Mean heart rate and oxygen saturation were compared between groups using ANOVA. Characteristics of infants in the 3 groups were compared using X2 test, Fisher exact test or ANOVA.

Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Shuffled envelopes to generate sequence.

Allocation concealment? Yes

Group assignments contained in opaque unmarked envelopes

Blinding? Yes

Intervention was not blinded, however, the outcome assessment was blinded. Outcome not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Isik 2000a

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

113 healthy newborns gestational ages between 37 and 42 weeks, median post natal age= 2 days (range 2-5 days)

Interventions

2 ml of 30% sucrose (n=28)
2 ml of 10% glucose (n=29)
2 ml of 30% glucose (n=28)
2 ml of distilled water (n=28)
syringed into the anterior third of the tongue for 1 minute
2 minutes prior to heel lance

Outcomes

Mean cry time during 3 minutes after heel lance
Mean maximum heart rate 3 minutes from heel lance
Mean recovery time for heart rate
Percent change in heart rate at 1, 2, 3 minutes after heel lance

Notes

One way ANOVA was used to evaluate mean cry time, recovery time and % change in heart rate
Results reported as means and standard errors of the mean
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Unclear

Cannot tell if intervention was blinded. Also cannot tell if HR assessment was blinded, however, it is stated that assessment of crying was blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Johnston 1997a

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

85 preterm infants (25 - 34 weeks gestational age) 2 - 10 days of age

Interventions

0.05 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance (n=27)
0.05 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance and simulated rocking 15 minutes prior to heel lance (n=14)
0.05 ml of sterile water via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance and simulated rocking 15 minutes prior to heel lance (n=24)
0.05 ml of sterile water via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance

Outcomes

Heart rate, oxygen saturation, behavioural facial actions, behavioural state
(NFCS) baseline and at three 30 second blocks

Notes

Data were analyzed using MANOVA (facial action). For heart rate repeated measures ANOVA was used with mean values but no standard deviations presented in graph form. For state repeated measures ANOVA was performed and no univariate means and standard deviations were presented.
02 saturation was dropped from analysis
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer-generated random allocation sequence.

Allocation concealment? Yes

Sequentially numbered envelopes.

Blinding? Yes

Not clear as to whether solutions were blinded

Outcome assessments blinded

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? No

Data reported as significance levels only and in figures only

Free of other bias? Yes

Johnston 1999a

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

48 preterm neonates mean gestational age of 31 weeks (range 25-34 weeks) within 10 days of birth

Interventions

0.05 ml of 24% sucrose as a single dose, followed by 2 doses of sterile water (n=15)
3 doses of 0.05 ml of 24% sucrose (n=17)
3 doses of 0.05 ml of sterile water (n=16)
given by syringe to anterior surface of the tongue at:
2 minutes prior to heel lance
just prior to lancing
2 minutes after lancing

Outcomes

Premature Infant Pain Profile
(PIPP)
measured over five 30 second blocks of time

Notes

Repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of single versus repeated doses of sucrose.
Means and standard deviations for pain scores were obtained from the author
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer-generated random assignment

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Kaufman 2002

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

57 infants undergoing circumcision

Interventions

Mogen method and water (n=15)
Mogen method and 24% sucrose (n=14)
Gomco method and 24% sucrose (n=14)
Gomco method and water (n=14)

Solutions were given via a dipped pacifier

Outcomes

Cry and grimacing during real time 10-second intervals.

Notes

Results were reported graphically. A 2-factor analysis of variance evaluated raw and percent duration of crying and grimacing. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the equivalence of empiric distribution functions was used to evaluate differences in the distribution of cumulative crying and grimacing.

Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not adequately described.

Allocation concealment? Yes

Solutions prepared and coded by pharmacy and stored in dark vials to deem them indistinguishable.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? No

Data reported incompletely in graphical form only and therefore cannot be meta-analyzed.

Free of other bias? Yes

Mathai 2006

Methods

Randomized study (blinded for cry but not for DAN)

Participants

104 term neonates older than 24 hours of life
Sucrose group mean postnatal age = 48 hours
Distilled water group mean postnatal age = 44 hours

Interventions

2 ml of 20% sucrose (n=17)

2 ml of distilled water (n=15)

2 ml of Expressed Breast Milk (EBM) (n=18)

Non-nutritive sucking (NNS) (n=20)

Rocking (n=17)

Message (n=17)

Outcomes

DAN before heel prick and 30 sec, 1 min, 2 min and 4 min after heel prick.
Time of first cry in seconds (until baby took first inspiration after beginning of cry), total cry in seconds
Heart rate and SpO2 before heel prick, 2 min after heel prick and 4 min after heel prick

Notes

Results were graphed and reported as means and standard deviations (2 SD)
AvNOVA, Fischer's exact 't' test, multivariate analysis, Pearson's correlation test - some p-values were reported

Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Sequence generated by random number table

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? No

Interventions could not be blinded. One observer left the room during the intervention to be able to assess the DAN score blindly. The second observer was in the room during the interventions and was not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Unclear

Physiological parameters (HR, oxygen saturation) not reported

Free of selective reporting? No

Physiological parameters (HR, oxygen saturation) not reported

Free of other bias? Yes

McCullough 2008

Methods

Randomized, double blind controlled trial

Participants

20 preterm infants, mean gestational age 30 weeks

Sucrose group: mean postnatal age = 23 days

Water group: mean postnatal age = 27 days

Interventions

(0.5 - 2 ml)of 24% Sucrose (n=26)

(0.5 - 2 ml) of sterile water (n=25)

*Note: A total of 51 NG tube insertions were performed. Each baby was randomized to either the control or treatment group prior to each insertion. This was not a crossover study.

Outcomes

Incidence of cry

Heart Rate

Oxygen Saturation

NFCS (median)

Notes

Incidence of cry reported as percentage of neonates who cried. Heart rate and oxygen saturation measured as change (in bpm and % saturation, respectively) from baseline.

Adverse events were evaluated; brief apnea and self-limiting bradycardia reported in a few neonates, but not clinical intervention needed. No statistically significant differences between sucrose and control groups regarding incidence of adverse events.

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer generated random number list

Allocation concealment? Yes

Used sealed opaque envelopes to allocate to groups

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? No

No information provided about why enrolled infants did not participate in the study

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Mitchell 2004

Methods

Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial

Participants

30 preterm infants

Water group: mean gestational age = 27.3 weeks, mean postnatal age = 8.2 weeks

Sucrose group: mean gestational age = 26.5 weeks, mean postnatal age = 8.5 weeks

Interventions

Water group: Pacifier and 3 doses of 0.1 ml sterile water drops (n=15)
Sucrose group: Pacifier and 3 doses of 0.1 ml 24% sucrose drops (n=15)

*Both groups received proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% and were swaddled before the eye examination

Outcomes

PIPP at baseline, eye drops instillation, examination of left eye and 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, and 120 sec after completion of the eye exam

Notes

Results were graphed and reported as means and standard errors of the means. A series of t tests were conducted and their p-values reported.

Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer-generated randomization sequence.

Allocation concealment? Yes

Allocated using sealed envelopes.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Nurse administering interventions was aware of group allocation. All other personnel and investigators were blinded. Outcome assessment was blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Mucignat 2004

Methods

Randomized, prospective study

Participants

33 preterm neonates, less than 33 weeks gestation

Mean (SD) gestational age at birth = 30 +/- 6 days

Mean (SD) gestational age at injection = 32 +/- 6 days

Interventions

Non-nutritive pacifier

0.2 - 0.5 ml of 30% sucrose with pacifier

local application of EMLA with pacifier

0.2 - 0.5 ml of sucrose with EMLA and pacifier

Outcomes

DAN and NFCS scores

Heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation measured before, during and after injection

Notes

Fisher test, ANOVA of fixed effect and the Tukey method was used to compare groups.

Results were reported as means and standard deviations.

Adverse effects: were not reported

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? No

Interventions could not be blinded. Did not state that outcome assessment was blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? No

Unequal distribution of allocated and received treatments amongst injections: NNS=41, EMLA=71, Sucrose=86, Combination EMLA + Sucrose =67

Ogawa 2005

Methods

Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial

Participants

100 healthy, full term infants greater than or equal to 37 weeks gestation

Interventions

1 ml of sterile water 2 min before heel lance (n=25)

1 ml of 50% sucrose 2 min before heel lance (n=25)

1 ml of sterile water 2 min before venipuncture (n=25)

1 ml of 50% sucrose 2 min before venipuncture (n=25)

Outcomes

NFCS score after skin puncture, during blood sampling and during compression to stop bleeding

Duration of first cry, ratio of crying to no crying, total procedure time

Notes

Intergroup comparisons were performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test Mann Whitney U test for continuous variables or by the X2 test for categorical data

Results were reported as medians and ranges and means and standard deviations. P-values were also reported.

Adverse effects: were evaluated for the procedure itself, not sucrose

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

100 sealed envelopes. Unsure if they were opaque.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Okan 2007

Methods

Randomized, blinded, crossover trial

Participants

31 preterm infants, mean (SD) gestational age 30.5 weeks (2.7), postnatal age of 20 days (16)

Interventions

2 ml of sterile water
2 ml of 20% sucrose
2 ml of 20% glucose

All solutions were given 2 min before heel lance

Outcomes

Heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation and NFCS score at baseline, heel lance and 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 4 min post heel lance.

Duration of first cry and total crying time

Notes

The differences in duration of crying time and blood collection were analyzed using the Friedman test.

Results were reported as means and standard deviations

Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Envelopes drawn randomly to determine sequence

Allocation concealment? Yes

Allocated by sealed envelopes. Solutions contained in identical bottles coded by nurse who was not a part of the study.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Ors 1999

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

102 healthy term infants, gestational age 37-42 weeks, median postnatal age 1.6 days (range1-15 days)

Interventions

2 ml of 25% sucrose (n=35)
2 ml of human milk (n=33)
2 ml of sterile water (n=34)
syringed to anterior part of tongue for one minute
Heel prick done 2 minutes after intervention

Outcomes

Median crying time 3 minutes after heel lance
Percent change in heart rate 1, 2, 3 minutes after heel lance

Notes

Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA used to assess differences between groups
Medians and interquartile ranges reported for outcomes
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Overgaard 1999

Methods

Double-blind randomized controlled trial

Participants

100 newborn term infants [mean age 6 days (range 4-9)]

Interventions

2 ml of 50% sucrose solution via syringe into the mouth over 30 seconds 2 minutes prior to heel lance
2 ml of sterile water via syringe into the mouth over 30 seconds 2 minutes prior to heel lance

Outcomes

NIPS
Crying time (duration of first cry, crying time during heel lance, fraction of crying during sampling, crying time during first minute after end of sampling, total crying time)
NIPS one minute after heel lance and one minute after blood sampling
Change in heart rate at 0,1 minutes
Change in O2 saturation at 0,1 minutes

Notes

Results were reported as medians and 5 and 95 percentiles
Statistical testing used Mann Whitney-U and Fisher's exact test
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Yes

100 syringes manufactured at random to contain sucrose or water. Numbered and administered consecutively. Contents were unknown to investigators and parents.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Ramenghi 1996a

Methods

Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled crossover study

Participants

15 (32-34 weeks gestation) infants greater than 24 hours of age

Interventions

1 ml of 25% sucrose via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance
1 ml of sterile water via syringe into mouth via syringe 2 minutes before heel lance.
(n=15, cross over design)

Outcomes

Duration of first cry (sec) following heel lance, percentage of time crying 5 minutes after heel lance, heart rate (at -2, 0, 1, 3, 5 min from heel lance), Behavioral scores (four facial expressions and the presence of cry (at -2, 0, 1, 3, 5 min from heel lance)

Notes

Medians and ranges were reported for duration of first cry, percent cry over 5 minutes and heart rate. For composite behavioural outcome scores data were presented in graph form only with no indication if data represent medians or means. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test used to evaluate outcomes
Adverse effects: were evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Unclear

Unsure if sucrose and water solutions blinded

Unsure of whether outcome assessment was blinded

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Ramenghi 1996b

Methods

Randomized, single blind, placebo controlled trial

Participants

60 (37 - 42 weeks gestational age) 2 - 5 days old infants

Interventions

2 ml of 25% sucrose via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15).
2 ml of 50% sucrose via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n =15).
2 ml of commercial sweet tasting solution (Calpol) via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15).
2 ml of sterile water via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15).

Outcomes

Duration of first cry (sec) following heel lance, percent time crying over 3 minutes following heel lance, percent change in heart rate over 5 min (-2, 0, 1, 3, 5 min from heel lance), behavioral scores (four facial expressions and the presence of cry (-2, 0, 1, 3, 5 min after heel lance)

Notes

Results were presented as medians and interquartile ranges for the pain score. For cry duration and percent crying over three minutes the data were presented as medians and inter quartile ranges. Percent change in heart rate was reported in graph form without indicating if data represent means or medians with standard deviations or errors. Mann-Whitney U test used to evaluate outcomes
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Outcome assessment were blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Ramenghi 1999

Methods

Randomized double blind placebo controlled cross over trial

Participants

30 preterm infants (GA 32 - 36 weeks, postnatal age < 24 hours)

Interventions

25% sucrose solution (volume not reported) was given via syringe into the mouth or via NG tube 2 minutes prior to first heel lance (n = 15), and via the alternate route for the second heel lance within 48 hours
Sterile water via syringe into the mouth or via NG-tube 2 minutes prior to first heel lance and for the second heel lance the alternate route within 48 hours
(cross over design, n= 30)

Outcomes

Percentage cry over 5 minutes after sampling;
Behavioral scores (four facial expressions and the presence of cry) at 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the lance for a total behavioural score

Notes

Mann Whitney-U and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranked test used to evaluate outcomes
Results reported as median and interquartile and total range
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Unclear

Do not describe measures taken to ensure blinding of intervention and outcome assessment.

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Rogers 2006

Methods

Randomized double blind trial

Participants

80 infants </= 90 days old, born at least 34 weeks' gestational age

Separated into 3 age groups: 1) 1-30 days, 2) 31-60 days, 3) 61-90 days

Interventions

2 ml of sterile water via syringe 2 min before bladder catheterization (n=40)

2 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe 2 min before bladder catheterization (n=40)

Outcomes

Douleur Aigue du Nouveau-ne (DAN) scale;

Precentage of cry;

Time to return to behavioral baseline

Notes

Post hoc subgroup analyses, t-tests, chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney test, ANOVA and Breslow-Day (BD) test for homogeneity used to evaluate outcomes.

Results were reported as means and standard deviations. P-values were also reported.

Adverse events: were evaluated-no adverse effects experienced

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Sequence generated by random number table

Allocation concealment? Yes

Syringes were coded by pharmacy, and solutions were indistinguishable

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Rush 2005

Methods

Prospective randomized controlled trial

Participants

30 infants less than 32 weeks GA or weighing less than 1500 g

Control group mean gestational age of 28.8wk (range 25-31 wk)

Treatment group mean gestational age of 29.57wk (range 26-32 wk)

Interventions

Control: No swaddling, no sucrose and not held by nurse

Treatment: Swaddled in a warm blanket, pacifier packed with gauze soaked in 24% sucrose and held by a nurse until 15 min after the eye exam

*All infants received eye drop instillation of 0.5% proparacaine and 1% tropicamide,  then 15 minutes later eye drop instillation of 0.5% tropicamide, 2.5% phenylephrin and, 0.5% tropicamide. Eye drops were all instilled into both eyes before the ROP exam.

Outcomes

Pulse rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation at baseline (30 min before instillation of proparacaine), 5 minutes before eye exam, 3 different times during eye exam and 5 minutes after the completion of the exam

Total crying time

Time required to return to baseline value

Notes

ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Pearson test were used to evaluate outcomes.

Results were reported as medians, means and standard errors of the means (SEM). p-values were also reported.

Adverse events: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

No blinding to interventions

Outcome assessments blinded

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Unclear

Pulse rate, respiratory rate data not reported

Free of selective reporting? No

Pulse rate, respiratory rate data not reported

Free of other bias? Yes

Rushforth 1993

Methods

Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study

Participants

52 infants (37 - 42 weeks gestational age) 2-7 days of age

Interventions

2 ml of 7.5% sucrose administered by a dropper into the mouth over a one minute period prior to heel lance (n = 26)
2 ml of sterile water administered by dropper into the mouth over a one minute period prior to heel lance (n = 26)

Outcomes

Percentage time crying during sampling and 3 minutes following the completion of the heel lance recorded on a standard audio tape recorder and analyzed blindly at a later date

Notes

Results are presented as medians only with no ranges
Mann Whitney-U test to evaluate duration of cry
Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Not clear as to whether sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Stang 1997

Methods

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial

Participants

80 healthy term male newborns, 39.5 weeks mean gestation age, mean postnatal age 31.5 hours

Interventions

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) with non buffered lidocaine (0.8 ml Lidocaine, 0.2 ml Saline), new padded restraint chair and pacifier dipped in water (n=20)

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) with buffered lidocaine (0.8 ml Lidocaine, 0.2 ml Sodium bicarbonate), rigid plastic restraint chair and pacifier dipped in water (n=20)

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) with non buffered lidocaine (0.8 ml Lidocaine, 0.2 ml Saline), rigid plastic restraint chair and pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose (n=20)

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) with non buffered lidocaine (0.8 ml Lidocaine, 0.2 ml Saline), rigid plastic restraint chair and pacifier dipped in water (n=20)

Outcomes

Behavioural Distress Scale (BDS) (scores at preinjection, at injection for DPNB, 2 min post injection, 4 min post injection and at circumcision)

Plasma cortisol level (30 min after start of circumcision)

Percentage of sleep during circumcision

Notes

Results were reported as mean and SD
ANOVA with repeated measures were used to compare distress scores. One way ANOVAs were used to examine plasma cortisol and sleep data.

Adverse effects: were not evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Stevens 1999

Methods

Randomized, crossover, controlled trial

Participants

122 neonates, 27 - 31 weeks gestational age, less than 28 days of age
Johnston, 1999b
Subsample of 25 preterm neonates, 27-31 weeks gestational age, less than 28 days of age (refer to Stevens, 1999)

Interventions

Prone positioning 30 minutes prior to heel lance. Pacifier dipped in sterile water and placed into the mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance
Pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose and placed into the mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance
No treatment. (n = 122, crossover design)

Outcomes

Premature Infant Pain Profile
(PIPP)

Notes

Repeated measures ANOVA and ANCOVA used to evaluate efficacy of treatment interventions
Means and standard deviations provided for pain scores
Adverse effects: were evaluated

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Blinding? Unclear

Blinding of solutions and outcome assessment unclear

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Stevens 2005

Methods

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Participants

66 preterm infants, 26-30 weeks gestational age, <72 hours postnatal age

Interventions

Control - no intervention (n=22)
0.1 ml of sterile water via syringe and pacifier (n=21)
0.1 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe and pacifier (n=23)

Solutions were given 2 min before every procedure during the first 28 days of life.

Outcomes

Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP)
Neonatal clinical outcomes and Neurobiological risk scores (NRBS)

Notes

Actual PIPP scores (mean, SD) were not reported. PIPP scores were analyzed by RMANOVA. Chi-squared analyses were used to compare the incidence of immediate and long-term adverse events.

Adverse events: were evaluated-adverse events were "low" and all immediate adverse events resolved spontaneously.

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Computer generated table of random numbers

Allocation concealment? Yes

Delivered to baby by pharmacist. Solutions carried in dark glass bottles. Water and sucrose solutions appeared to be the same.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Storm 2002

Methods

Randomized, controlled trial

Participants

48 preterm, median gestational age 32 wk, median postnatal age 14 days

Interventions

2 ml of 15% sucrose, n = 12
1 ml of 25% sucrose, n =12
milk via NG tube, n= 12
milk via NG tube, + 25% sucrose, n = 12
All infants were given water prior to a second heel lance
Oral solutions were administered via syringe into infant's mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance.
Milk was given during the last hour prior to heel lance.

Outcomes

Changes from before heel lance to during heel lance for:
Crying time
Changes in behavioural state
Skin conductance
Heart rate

Notes

Paired non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon test) used to compare the infant's intervention and control session
No median or IQR reported for each outcome
Adverse effects: were not evaluated.

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Unclear

Two groups fasting, two groups fed up to 1 hour prior to intervention with NG-tube   

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? No

Results in figures and p-values only. No data that can be meta-analyzed presented.

Free of other bias? Yes

Taddio 2008

Methods

Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Participants

240 newborns, mean gestational age 38.7 - 39.9 weeks, mean postnatal age 0.5 - 0.8 hrs

Interventions

2 ml of 24% sucrose given to newborns of nondiabetic mothers, n = 60

2 ml of sterile water given to newborns of nondiabetic mothers, n = 60

2 ml of 24% sucrose given to newborns of diabetic mothers, n = 60

2 ml of sterile water given to newborns of diabetic mothers, n = 60

Solutions were given before all intramuscular injections, venipunctures and heel lances during the first 2 days of birth

Outcomes

PIPP score during procedure

Notes

Student t-test used to compare average PIPP scores between groups. Post-hoc analyses was performed after adjusting for baseline characteristics by use of a general linear model for intramuscular injection and venipuncture and linear mixed-model analysis for heel lances. Adverse events were analyzed using the X2 test or the Student t-test

Adverse effects: were reported-no significant differences between groups in the incidence of adverse events which included spitting up, and blood glucose levels.

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Yes

Random numbers table. 1:1 allocation

Allocation concealment? Yes

Centralized at the hospital pharmacy. Solutions carried in identical bottles only labelled with patient ID.

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Unceta-Barranechea 2008

Methods

Prospective randomized controlled trial

Participants

150 term infants

Interventions

Control - Facilitated tucking

NNS with water

2 ml 24% sucrose with NNS

Outcomes

Modified NFCS, mean crying time

Notes

Paper translated from Spanish to English

Risk of bias table

ItemJudgementDescription
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear

Sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment? Unclear

Allocation concealment not described

Blinding? Yes

Sucrose and water solutions blinded

Blinding of outcome assessments

Incomplete outcome data addressed? Yes

Free of selective reporting? Yes

Free of other bias? Yes

Characteristics of excluded studies

Abad 1993

Reason for exclusion

Abstract

Abad 2001

Reason for exclusion

Although this is a randomized controlled trial, four newborns were included twice (i.e. there were 55 events recorded for 51 participants), therefore, it was not possible to separate data for 51 newborns.

Ahuja 2000

Reason for exclusion

This is a non-randomized study. A single cohort was studied. The intervention was a non-sucrose sweetener.

Barbier 1994

Reason for exclusion

Study did not include the use of sucrose.

Barr 1993

Reason for exclusion

Although a randomized controlled trial, the authors do not provide information on the number of infants in each group. Results are presented in graph form without indicating whether means or medians were used. No standard deviations are presented.

Barr 1995

Reason for exclusion

Excluded based on Post Natal Age (PNA) (2 and 4 months PNA).

Bilgen 2001

Reason for exclusion

This manuscript was published previously in the European Journal of Pediatrics ("Comparison of sucrose and human milk on pain response in newborns" by Ors et al, Eur J Pediatr, 158:63-66, 1999) and therefore, this article has been retracted by the Journal of Pain.
The editor of the Journal of Pain states that "Anyone citing this article must cite from the European Journal of Pediatrics and not from the Journal of Pain".

Blass 1991

Reason for exclusion

Although this is a randomized controlled trial the number of neonates in each group is not stated.

Blass 1995

Reason for exclusion

This is a controlled trial without randomization. The number of patients in each group is not stated.

Blass 2001

Reason for exclusion

Study not fully randomized.

Bucher 2000

Reason for exclusion

This study used an artificial sweetener, glycine or breast milk as the intervention.

Curtis 2007

Reason for exclusion

PNA 0-6 months.

Efe 2007

Reason for exclusion

Study not fully randomized.

Fernandez 2003

Reason for exclusion

Study not related to a painful procedure.

Gibbins 2000

Reason for exclusion

Abstract

Gormally 1996

Reason for exclusion

Abstract

Graillon 1997

Reason for exclusion

A randomized controlled crossover study. 60 crying infants were randomized to receive 250 ul of 24% sucrose solution, 0.25% quinine hydrochloride solution, or corn oil as well as water in a mixed parallel crossover design. Relative to water, sucrose persistently reduced crying, and transiently increased mouthing and hand-mouth contact. No painful stimulus was applied to the neonates.

Isik 2000b

Reason for exclusion

Abstract

Johnston 2000

Reason for exclusion

Abstract

Johnston 2002

Reason for exclusion

Pain intensity not measured.

Lewindon 1998

Reason for exclusion

The infants in this study were older than the inclusion criteria for this review (mean age 17.1 weeks).

Mellah 1999

Reason for exclusion

Randomized double blind cross-over study. Data analyzed by paired t-test. Results from the first exposure to sucrose or placebo could not be isolated.

Mohan 1998

Reason for exclusion

Control group was not randomized.

Ramenghi 2002

Reason for exclusion

Immunizations performed at 2, 3 or 4 months.

Razmus 2004

Reason for exclusion

Study not fully randomized.

Reis 2003

Reason for exclusion

PNA (Mean PNA =9.5 weeks).

Skogsdal 1997

Reason for exclusion

This study used glucose and breast milk as the interventions.

Stevens 1997b

Reason for exclusion

Abstract

Stevens 2000

Reason for exclusion

Abstract

Taddio 2000

Reason for exclusion

Not RCT and PNA included older infants.

Taddio 2003

Reason for exclusion

Infants did not receive painful procedure.

Taddio 2009

Reason for exclusion

Population subset of a larger study already included in the review.

Vederhus 2006

Reason for exclusion

Sucrose was not used as an intervention.

Yoon 2001

Reason for exclusion

Not fully randomized.

Characteristics of studies awaiting classification

Akman 2002

Methods

Unknown

i) Blinding of randomization - Unclear
ii) Blinding of intervention -Unclear
iii) Complete follow-up - Unclear
iv) Blinding of outcome measurement -Unclear

Participants

138 neonates, 37 to 42 weeks postmenstrual age, greater than 24 hours postnatal age. Mean age of 2 days for all groups.

Interventions

2 ml of 12.5% glucose plus pacifier

2 ml of 12.5% sucrose plus pacifier

2 ml of 12.5% glucose

2 ml of 12.5% sucrose

2 ml of sterile water

Outcomes

Crying behaviours, NFCS

Notes

Cry duration measured up to 3 minutes after heel lance in seconds.

Adverse effects: not reported

Singh 2001

Methods

Unknown

Participants

Unknown

Interventions

Unknown

Outcomes

Unknown

Notes

Unknown

Additional tables

1 Trials assessing pain during heel lances

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Blass 1997

72 infants, 22-40 hours old

Heel Lance

2 ml of either of the following solutions:

water       

12% sucrose    

protein mixture

7% lactose         

dilute fat (coconut and soy oil)    

concentrated fat                                 fat and lactose mixture  

Ross Special Formula (RSF) (water, protein, lactose, fat)           

milk

n= 8 for all groups

Crying time (%) during blood collection and 1, 2 and 3 minutes after heel lance   

               

              

Mean % of crying time per minute at 1, 2 and 3 minutes after heel lance (recovery period)

Mean proportions    

Graphically reported

Significantly less crying time during blood collection in the sucrose group (47%) compared to the water group (92%, p = 0.015).

Blass 1999

40 term newborn infants, 34 - 55 hours old

Heel Lance

2 ml of 12% sucrose over 2 minutes via syringe (n=10)

2 ml of water via syringe over 2 minutes (n=10)

Pacifier dipped every 30 seconds in 12% sucrose solution for 2 minutes (n=10)

Pacifier dipped in water every 30 seconds for 2 minutes (n = 10) prior to heel lance

% time crying 3 minutes after heel lance

Mean change in HR

% time grimacing

Mean percentage

Mean change in beats per minute

Mean percentage

2 ml of 12% (0.24g) sucrose alone diminished cry duration from heel lance compared to water ( 8% vs. 50%, p = 0.003) and water with pacifier ( 8% vs. 35%, p = 0.002). Sucrose with pacifier (pacifier with 12% sucrose) more effective in reducing cry duration compared to water with pacifier (5% vs. 35%, p = 0.001) or water alone (50%, p = 0.002)

Mean heart rate increased significantly from treatment to heel lance in infants receiving water alone (mean increase of 17 beats per minute, p = 0.002) and water with pacifier (mean increase of 20 beats per minute, p = 0.005). Mean increase in heart rates also increased for the 2 ml of 12% (0.24g) sucrose and pacifier group (mean difference of 7.4 beats per minute, p = 0.05) but not for infants receiving 2 ml of 12% (0.24 g) sucrose alone (mean difference of 5.9 beats per minute, p = 0.142)

2 ml of 12%(0.24 g) sucrose reduced grimacing compared to water (p = 0.0003). 12% (0.24 g) sucrose with pacifier reduced grimacing compared to water (p = 0.001) and pacifier alone (p = 0.04).

Bucher 1995

16 preterm infants (27 - 34 weeks gestational age), postnatal age approximately 42 days

Heel Lance

2 ml of 50% sucrose via syringe into the mouth 2 minutes before heel lance.

2 ml of distilled water via syringe into the mouth 2 minutes before heel lance (n = 16, cross-over design

% time crying

Recovery time until crying stopped

Increase in HR

Recovery time for HR

TcpO2 (max increase -kPa); TcpO2 (max decrease -kPa); TcpO2 (difference between baseline and 10 minutes after end of intervention -kPa); TcpCO2 (max decrease -kPa); TcpCO2 (difference between baseline and 10 min after the end of intervention), recovery time for respirations.

Not Reported

Median, IQR

Median, IQR

Cry duration (% of total duration of intervention) significantly reduced in 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group (71.5%) compared to control group (93.5%, p = 0.002)

Median increase in heart rate [beats per minute (bpm)] after heel lance were significantly reduced in the 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) of sucrose group (35 bpm) compared to water (51 bpm), p = 0.005

No significant differences between groups with respect to measures for Tcp02 (p = 0.05) and TcpC02(p = 0.21)

Codipietro 2008

101 term infants (39.3-39.4 weeks) gestational age

Heel Lance

Breastfeeding prior to heel lance (N=51)

1 ml 25% sucrose via syringe (N=50)

Duration of first cry, % crying time in first 2 minutes, and % crying time during blood sampling

HR increase from baselines at 30 seconds following commencement of procedure

02 sat decrease

PIPP during blood sampling, 2 min after heel lance.

Median, range

Median duration of first cry: BF group [3 (0 - 12)] compared to sucrose [21 (0-120)] p = 0.004

% crying during first 2 minutes:   BF group (4(0-100) compared to sucrose (45(0-100) p < 0.001

% crying during sampling: BF group (8 (0 -100) compared to sucrose (56.5 (0 -100) p = 0.0003

Median increase in HR from baseline to 30 sec after start of heel lance was significantly lower in breastfeeding group [13(-12 to 54)] compared to sucrose group [22(-32 to 65)], p =0.005

Median decrease in 02sat from baseline to 30 sec after start of heel lance was significantly greater in sucrose group [-3(-30 to 1)] compared to breastfeeding group [-1(-14 to 2)], p = 0.001

Median PIPP scores significantly lower in breastfeeding group (3.0) vs sucrose group (8.5), p < 0.0001

Gibbins 2002

190 preterm and term infants , mean gestational age of 33.7 weeks, under 7 days post natal age

Heel Lance

0.5 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe to the anterior surface of the tongue followed by pacifier (n=64)
0.5 ml 24% sucrose without pacifier (n=62)
0.5 ml sterile water with pacifier (n=64)
2 minutes prior to heel lance

PIPP scores at 30 and 60 seconds after heel lance

Reported Means, SD

Statistically significant difference in mean PIPP scores at both 30 seconds (F = 8.23, p < 0.001) and 60 seconds (F = 8.49, p < 0.001) after heel lance in favour of 0.5 ml of 24% (0.12 g) sucrose group and 0.5 ml of 24%(0.12 g) sucrose with pacifier group. Post-hoc Tukey tests showed infants who received sucrose and pacifier had significantly lower PIPP scores after heel lance at 30 seconds (mean 8.16, SD 3.24) compared to infants receiving sucrose alone (mean 9.77, SD 3.04, p = 0.007) and water with pacifier (mean 10.19, SD 2.67, p < 0.001). At 60 seconds after heel lance, PIPP scores were significantly lower for 0.5 ml of 24% (0.12 g) sucrose with pacifier group (mean 8.78, SD 4.03) compared to the 0.5 ml of 24% (0.12g) sucrose alone group (mean 11.20, SD 3.25, p = 0.005) and water with pacifier group (mean 11.20, SD 3.47, p = 0.007). No significant differences in PIPP scores found between 0.5 ml of 24% (0.12 g) sucrose alone group or water with pacifier group at both follow-up times

Gormally 2001

94 term newborns, mean gestational age 39.4 weeks on 2nd or 3rd day of life

Heel Lance

No holding and sterile water given by pipette (n=21)

No holding and 0.250 ml of 24% sucrose solution given by pipette (n=22)

Holding and sterile water given by pipette (n=20)

Holding and 0.250 ml of 24% sucrose solution by pipette (n=22)

All solutions given 3 times at 30 second intervals

% time crying 1, 2, 3 minutes after heel lance

Mean HR preintervention, 1, 2, 3 minutes after heel lance, Mean vagal tone index preintervention, 1, 2, 3 minutes after heel lance

Pain concatenation scores for facial activity preintervention, 1, 2, 3 minutes after heel lance

Not reported

Crying decreased over time [F(2,80) = 10.0, p < 0.001] but no significant interaction noted for time with holding, taste, or holding and taste. Effect of taste on crying was significant [F(1,81) = 4.1, p < 0.05] in favour of 0.25 ml of 24% (0.18 g) sucrose. Effect of holding not statistically significant [F(1,81) = 3.0, p = 0.09)]. No statistically significant interaction between taste and holding to reduce crying [F(1,81) = 0.80, p = 0.37]. Effect of combined interventions was additive.

Although no significant differences in mean heart rate due to holding or sucrose as main effects, there was significant interaction between holding and taste [F(1,61) = 8.89, p< 0.004], indicating synergistic effect that was also dependent on preintervention heart rate [F(1,61) = 9.23, p < 0.004]. No significant main effects noted for vagal tone; as with heart rate, effect of vagal tone was dependent on preintervention vagal tone for both holding and taste interventions [F(1,60) = 4.82, p < 0.03]. Preintervention levels interacted to decrease heart rate and vagal tone in infants who had higher rates before interventions.

Pain concatenation scores measuring facial expressions of pain decreased over time [F(1,65) = 28.5, p <0.001]. Only the effect of holding reduced pain scores [F(1,65) = 5.6, p <0.02].No difference as to whether infant received sucrose (taste main effect F[1,65] 0.17,p =0.68

Greenberg 2002

84 term newborns, approx. 17-19 hours old.

Heel Lance

Sugar coated pacifier (n=21)

water moistened pacifier (n=21)

2 ml of 12% sucrose (n =21)

routine care (n=21)

Duration of cry from procedure phase to 3 minutes post-procedure

Vagal tone and Vagal tone index

Salivary cortisol levels

Not reported

Significant decrease in duration of cry for the sugar-coated pacifier group compared to the control group (p = 0.001) and the water-pacifier group (p = 0.001).

Lower vagal tone during heel lance in the sugar coated pacifier group compared to the control group (p = 0.008) and oral sucrose group (p = 0.018). Lower vagal tone index in the sugar coated pacifier group compared to control group at heel lance (p = 0.019), and 6-10 minutes after (p = 0.007) and 11-15 minutes (p = 0.049) after heel lance.

No significant differences were found in salivary cortisol levels across groups (no p-value reported).

Guala 2001

140 term (38-41 wk's gestational age)

Heel lance

Nothing (n=20) Water (n = 20) 5% Glucose (n = 20) 33% Glucose (n = 20 50% Glucose (n = 20) 33% Sucrose (n = 20) 50% Sucrose (n = 20)

Heart rate before, during and 3 minutes after heel lance

Mean, SD

No significant differences were found between groups for differences in heart rate at each of the 3 phases of the heel lance (p-value reported for 3 minutes after heel lance, p = 0.087; the difference between 3 minutes after heel lance and during heel lance, p = 0.068).

Haouari 1995

60 term (37-42 weeks gestation) infants. 1-6 days of age

Heel Lance

2 ml of 12.5% sucrose 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)

2 ml of 25% sucrose 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)

2 ml of 50 % sucrose 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)

2 ml of sterile water 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)

All solutions were given by syringe on the tongue over less than one minute

Total time crying over 3 minutes. Time of first cry after lance

Percent change in HR at 1, 3, 5 minutes after heel lance

Median, IQR

Reported Means and SEM

After heel lance, significant decreases in total crying time and duration of first cry in 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group compared with water (p = 0.02). Significant reduction in median time crying at end of first minute (p < 0.02) in 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group (35 sec; range 14 - 60) compared with water (60 sec; range 50 -60). In second minute, duration of cry was significantly less in 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group (0 sec; range 0 - 25) and in 2 ml of 25% (0.5 g) sucrose group (18 sec; range 0 - 55) compared to water (60 sec; range 40 - 60), p = 0.003, p = 0.02 respectively

Significant decrease in percent change in heart rate 3 minutes after heel lancing (p = 0.02) in the 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group (mean 0.1%, SE 3.3) compared to water group (mean 17.5%, SE 6.0)

Harrison 2003

99 sick hospitalized infants, mean (SD) gestation age 36.7 weeks (3.3) (treatment), 36.8 weeks (3.7) (control)  (author provided data on a subset of infants from a larger study (n=128) that fulfilled our inclusion criteria)

Heel Lance

1 ml of water (n=46)

1 ml of 25% sucrose (n=53)

For infants weighing 1500g or less, the dose was reduced to 0.5 ml

Duration of cry until 5 second pause, incidence and duration of crying time during the heel lance and squeeze and during the 3 minute recovery period

Heart rate (HR) at baseline, heel lance, during heel lance and 1, 2, 3 minutes post heel lance

Oxygen saturation at baseline, heel lance, during heel lance and 1, 2, 3 minutes post heel lance

Four point subset of the Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) (brow bulge, eye squeeze, nasolabial furrow, stretch mouth) at heel lance, during heel lance and 1, 2, 3 minutes post heel lance

Mean, SD (collected from authors)

Mean length of first cry was higher in the water group [70.5 (83.6)] compared to the sucrose group [46.8 (63.1)]. The sucrose group cried 57.1% of the procedure time compared to 58.8% in the water group. The mean total duration of cry during the heel lance was 84.7 seconds (68.8) in the sucrose group and 87.4 seconds (87.1) in the water group.

The mean (SD) HR upon heel lance was 163.0 (17.9) bpm in the sucrose group and 159.5 (19.2) bpm in the water group. HR at 30 seconds from the beginning of the procedure was 175.4 (22.2) and 172.8 (23.6) bpm in the sucrose and water groups, respectively. The HR in both groups decreased after the procedure to 152.1 (22.5) bpm in the sucrose group and 154.2 (29.1) bpm in the water group 2 minutes post heel lance.

Results of SpO2 were similar between the two groups.

Mean facial scores were significantly reduced at heel lance [2.74 (1.8)] in the sucrose group compared to the water group [ 2.94 (1.6) ; p = 0.02] and at 1 minute (p = 0.04) and 2 minutes (p = 0.046) post-heel lance. No significant differences occurred at 3 minutes post heel lance.

Isik 2000

113 healthy term newborns gestational ages between 37 and 42 weeks, median post natal age= 2days (range 2-5 days)

Heel Lance

2 ml of 30% sucrose (n=28)

2 ml of 10% glucose (n=29)

2 ml of 30% glucose (n=28)

2 ml of distilled water (n=28)

syringed into the anterior third of the tongue for 1 minute 2 minutes prior to heel lance

Mean cry time during 3 minutes after lance

Mean maximum heart rate 3 minutes from heel lance

Mean recovery time for heart rate

% change in heart rate at 1, 2, 3 minutes after heel lance

Reported means, SD

Reported Means and SEM

Infants who received 2 ml of 30% (0.6 g) sucrose (mean crying time of 61 seconds) cried significantly less than those who received 30% glucose (mean crying time of 95 seconds), 10% glucose (mean crying time of 103 seconds) or sterile water (mean crying time of 105 seconds), p = 0.02

No significant difference between groups with respect to maximum heart rate after heel lance, (p = 0.71), or mean recovery time, (p = 0.09). No significant difference found in percent change in heart rate at 1 or 3 minutes after heel lance, (p = 0.14, p = 0.53), respectively. At 2 minutes after heel lance, percent change in heart rate favoured group receiving sucrose (p = 0.05) compared to other groups

Johnston 1997a

85 preterm infants (25 - 34 weeks gestational age) 2 - 10 days of age

Heel Lance

0.05 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance (n = 27)
0.05 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance and simulated rocking 15 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 14)
0.05 ml of sterile water via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance and simulated rocking 15 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 24)
0.05 ml of sterile water via syringe into the mouth just prior to heel lance

HR at baseline and 3 x 30 second blocks

Behavioural facial actions(Neonatal Facial Coding System-NFCS) at baseline and 3 x30 second blocks

Not reported

Although heart rate increased across all phases of procedure [F(3,59) = 2.94, p < 0.04], there was no significant differences noted between groups [F(3,59)=0.682, p = 0.566]

Decrease in percent facial action in 0.05 ml of 24% (0.012 g) sucrose alone group and combined 0.05 ml of 24% (0.012 g) sucrose and rocking group compared to water group, F (6, 150) = 2.765, p < 0.02

Johnston 1999a

48 preterm neonates mean gestational age of 31 weeks (range 25-34 weeks) within 10 days of birth

Heel Lance

0.05 ml of 24% sucrose as a single dose, followed by 2 doses of sterile water (n=15)
3 doses of 0.05 ml of 24% sucrose (n=17)
3 doses of 0.05 ml of sterile water (n=16)
given by syringe to anterior surface of the tongue at:
2 minutes prior to heel lance
just prior to lancing
2 minutes after lancing

PIPP scores in five 30 second blocks

Reported Means, SD

Statistically significant difference between groups (F = 9.143, p < 0.0001) for mean PIPP scores. Post-hoc analysis found significantly lower PIPP scores with repeated doses of 0.05 ml of 24% (0.012 g) sucrose compared to placebo groups across all blocks of time, p < 0.05. PIPP scores for repeated doses of 0.05 ml of 24% (0.012 g) sucrose were significantly lower compared to single doses of 0.05 ml of 24% (0.012 g) sucrose (8.25 vs. 6.25) only at last block of time, p < 0.05. PIPP scores for single doses of 0.05 ml of 24% (0.012 g) sucrose compared to placebo showed trend towards statistical significance in favour of 0.05 ml of 24% (0.012 g) sucrose (F = 3.465, p = 0.07)

Mathai 2006

104 term neonates, postnatal age older than 24hr of life

Sucrose group mean postnatal age 48 hours

Distilled water groups mean postnatal age 44 hours

Heel lance

 

2 ml 20% sucrose instilled into mouth via a dropper (n=17)

2 ml distilled water instilled into mouth via a dropper (n=15)

rocking (n=17)

massage (n=17)

expressed breast milk (n=18)

non-nutritive sucking (n=18)

Time of first cry in seconds, Total cry in seconds

Heart rate before heel prick, 2 min after heel lance and 4 min after heel lance

Oxygen saturation before heel lance, 2 min after heel lance and 4 min after heel lance

Douleur Aigue du Nouveau-ne (DAN) scale before the heel lance and 30 seconds, 1 min, 2 min, 4 min after heel lance

Means, SD reported

Not reported

Mean, SD

No significant difference between sucrose group and any other group for time of first cry

NNS and rocking significantly reduced total duration of cry, p < 0.05

No significant difference in heart rate between the groups at any time point.

No significant difference in oxygen saturation between the groups at any time point.

Significantly reduced DAN scores at 30s after the heel lance for the sucrose group (mean 7.6, SD 14, p < 0.05)  however this was not sustained at 1,2 and 4 minutes 

NNS and rocking sigificantly decreased the DAN scores at 2 and 4 minutes post heel lance, p < 0.05.

Okan 2007

31 healthy preterm newborns, mean gestational age 30.5 weeks, mean postmenstrual age 32.3 weeks

Heel Lance

2 ml of 20% sucrose

2 ml of 20% glucose

2 ml of water

Infants received all 3 interventions at different times

Duration of first cry and total crying time

Heart rate (HR) at baseline, during heel lance and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 minutes post heel lance

Oxygen saturation and respiratory rate at baseline, during heel lance and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 minutes after heel lance

Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) scores during heel lance and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 minutes post heel lance

Mean, SD

Significantly increased duration of first cry and total crying time in the water group compared to the sucrose and glucose groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.007, respectively). No significant differences in cry characteristics were observed between the sucrose and glucose groups.

Significantly higher HR in the water group (mean 175, SD 20.8) compared to the sucrose (mean 166, SD 17.6) and glucose groups (mean 165, SD 17.5) at 1 minute following heel lance (p= 0.007). No significant differences between the sucrose and glucose groups.

Significantly higher NFCS score in the placebo group in the fourth minute following heel lance (mean 1.3, SD) and fifth minute following heel lance (mean 1.0, SD 1.0) compared to the sucrose (mean 0.5, SD 1.7; mean 0.3, SD 1.3 respectively) and glucose groups (mean 0.2, SD 0.5; mean 0.1, SD 0.3 respectively) p= 0.009 at fourth minute and p = 0.049 at fifth minute. There were no significant differences between the sucrose and glucose groups.

Ors 1999

102 healthy term infants, gestational age 37-42 weeks, median postnatal age 1.6 days (range1-15 days)

Heel Lance

2 ml of 25% sucrose (n=35)

2 ml of human milk (n=33)

2 ml of sterile water (n=34)

All solutions syringed onto anterior part of tongue for one minute

Heel prick performed 2 minutes after intervention

Median cry time during 3 minutes after lance

Percent change HR 1,2,3 minutes after heel lance

Median, IQR

Significant decrease in crying times for 2 ml of 25% (0.5 g) sucrose group (median 36, interquartile range 18-43) compared to human milk (median 62, interquartile range 29-107) and sterile water [(median 52, interquartile range 32-158), p = 0.0009]. Recovery time for crying was significantly reduced in 2 ml of 25% (0.5 g )sucrose group (median 72, interquartile range 48-116) compared to human milk (median 112, interquartile range 72-180) and sterile water [(median 124, interquartile range 82-180), p = 0.004]

Percent change in heart rate after heel lance was significantly lower in the group receiving 2 ml of 25% (0.5g) sucrose compared to groups receiving human milk and sterile water at 1, 2 and 3 minutes (p = 0.008, p = 0.01, p = 0.002, respectively)

Overgaard 1999

100 newborn term infants [mean age 6 days (range 4-9)]

Heel Lance

2 ml of 50% sucrose solution via syringe into the mouth over 30 seconds 2 minutes prior to heel lance

2 ml of sterile water via syringe into the mouth over 30 seconds 2 minutes prior to heel lance

Median crying time during heel lance, fraction of crying during sampling, crying time during first minute after end of sampling, total crying time

Change HR 0,1 minutes

Oxygen saturation at 0, 1 minutes

Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) scores 1 minute after heel lance and 1 minute after blood sampling

Median, 5th and 95th percentiles

Median duration of first cry in group receiving 2 ml of 50% (1 g) sucrose was significantly lower (18 seconds (2-75) compared to placebo group [(22 seconds (11-143), p = 0.03]. Median crying time during heel lance in the sucrose group was lower (26 seconds (2-183) compared to placebo group [(40 seconds (12 - 157), p = 0.07]. Median fraction of crying during sampling in 2 ml of 50% (1 g) sucrose group was significantly lower (43% (4-100) compared to placebo group [(83% (20 - 100), p = 0.004]. Median crying time during first minute after end of sampling in 2 ml of 50% (1 g) sucrose group was significantly lower (3 seconds (0 - 58) compared to placebo group [(16 seconds (0-59), p = 0.004]. Median total time crying in 2 ml of 50% (1 g) sucrose group was significantly lower (30 seconds (2 - 217) compared to placebo group [(71 seconds (13-176), p = 0.007]

No significant HR differences between groups, p = 0.05

No significant differences between groups with respect to changes in oxygen saturation, p = 0.8

Median NIPS scores 1 minute after heel lance were lower in 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group compared to placebo group [(3(0-7), 6(0-7), respectively), p = 0.04]. Median NIPS scores 1 minute after end of blood sampling were lower in 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group [0 (0-7)] compared to placebo group [(2 (0-7), p = 0.05]

Ramenghi 1996a

15 preterm (32-34 weeks gestation) infants greater than 24 hours of age

Heel Lance

1 ml of 25% sucrose via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance

1 ml of sterile water via syringe into mouth 2 minutes before heel lance (n=15, cross-over design)

Duration of first cry and % time crying 5 minutes after lance

Heart rate (at -2, 0, 1,3,5 minutes from heel lance)

Behavioral scores (four facial expressions and the presence of cry) -2,-1,0,1,2,3,5 minutes

Quality/intensity of sucking

Median, IQR

Not reported

Not reported

Significant decrease in total percentage of time crying over 5 minutes (median 6%, interquartile range 3.3 - 15.3) in the 1 ml of 25% (0.25 g) sucrose group compared with water group [(median 16.6%, range 5 - 27.3), p = 0.018]. Duration of first cry was significantly decreased in the 1 ml of 25% (0.25 g) sucrose group (median 12 sec, interquartile range 8 - 22 sec) compared to control group [(median quartile 23 sec, range 15 - 45), p = 0.004]

No significant differences in HR between groups, p-value not reported

Mean pain scores were significantly lower in the groups receiving 1 ml of 25% sucrose (0.25 g)of sucrose at both 1 minute and 3 minutes after heel lance ( p = 0.01, p = 0.03, respectively).

The clinical interpretation of the quality of sucking was significantly more intense in the 1 ml of 25% (0.25 g) sucrose group than in the water group (p = 0.04).

Ramenghi 1996b

60 term (37 - 42 weeks gestational age) 2 - 5 days old infants

Heel Lance

2 ml of 25% sucrose via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)

2 ml of 50% sucrose via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n =15)

2 ml of commercial sweet tasting solution (Calpol) via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)

2 ml of sterile water via syringe into mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance (n = 15)

Duration of first cry after lance

% time crying over 3 minutes after heel lance

Percent change in heart rate over 5 minutes (at -2, 0, 1,3,5 minutes from heel lance)

Behavioral scores (four facial expressions and the presence of cry) -2,-1,0,1,2,3,5 minutes

Median, IQR

Not Reported

Median, IQR

Significant decrease in duration of first cry and percent crying during 3 minutes after heel lance in the 2 ml of 25% (0.5 g) sucrose, 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose and Calpol groups (p = 0.02) (data in graph form only)

Significant increase in heart rate for 3 minutes after heel lance in water group compared with 2 ml of 50% (1.0 g) sucrose group and Calpol group, p = 0.009

Pain score (0 - 5) was significantly higher in water group (score = 2, range 1-5) than in other three groups: 2 ml of 50% (1 g) sucrose group (score = 0, range 0 - 3); 2 ml of 25% (0.5 g) sucrose group (score = 0, range 0 - 2); Calpol group (score = 0, range 0 -1), p = 0.05

Ramenghi 1999

30 preterm infants (GA 32-36 weeks, postnatal age < 24 hours)

Heel Lance

25 % sucrose solution (volume not reported) was given via syringe into the mouth or via NG tube 2 minutes prior to first heel lance (n = 15), and via the alternate route for the second heel lance within 48 hours

Sterile water via syringe into the mouth or via NG-tube 2 minutes prior to first heel lance and for the second heel lance the alternate route within 48 hours (cross over design, n= 30)

% cry over 5 minutes after sampling

Behavioral scores (four facial expressions and the presence of cry) at 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the lance for a total behavioral score

Median, IQR

Median percentage cry in intraoral water group was 22% (interquartile range 10.6 - 40) and 27% (interquartile range 11.6 - 47) for infants in NG-tube water group. Median percentage cry in intraoral 25% sucrose group was 6% (interquartile range 0.6 -15) and 18.3% (interquartile range 11.6 - 41.6) for NG-tube 25% sucrose group. Significant reduction in crying time (p = 0.006) noted in the 25% sucrose group compared with water group when infants received 25% sucrose intraorally, not via NG-tube route. For infants in 25% sucrose group, significant reduction in crying time noted (p = 0.008) when solution given intraorally compared to NG-tube route

Behavioral scores for the intraoral water group was 9 (interquartile range 6-12) and 10 (interquartile range 6-14) for N-G tube water group. Behavioural scores for intraoral 25% sucrose group was 5 (interquartile range 3-6) and 9 (interquartile range 8-10) for NG-tube sucrose group. Significant reduction in behavioral scores noted in 25% sucrose group (p = 0.002) compared with water group when infants received 25% sucrose intraorally but not via N-G route. For infants in 25% sucrose group, there was significant reduction in behavioral score, p = 0.001 when solution was given intraorally compared to via NG-tube

Rushforth 1993

52 term infants (37 - 42 weeks gestational age) 2-7 days of age.

Heel Lance

2 ml of 7.5% sucrose administered by a dropper into the mouth over a one minute period prior to heel lance (n = 26).

2 ml of sterile water administered by dropper into the mouth over a one minute period prior to heel lance (n = 26).

% cry over 3 minutes after sampling

Median only

No significant differences in median percentage time crying between group receiving 2 ml of 7.5% (0.15 g) sucrose (74.3%) compared to group receiving water (73.2%). No significant differences between groups in duration of cry after 1 minute (p = 0.65), 2 minutes (p = 0.52) and 3 minutes (p = 0.72). No difference in time to cessation of crying (p = 0.16)

Stevens 1999

122 neonates, 27 - 31 weeks gestational age, less than 28 days of age

Heel Lance

Prone positioning 30 minutes prior to heel lance

Pacifier dipped in sterile water and placed into the mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance

Pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose and placed into the mouth 2 minutes prior to heel lance

Control:Containment in SnuggleUp device (n = 122)

NB: All infants were contained in SnuggleUp device

PIPP scores at 30 and 60 seconds

Reported Means, SD

Main effect of treatment for mean PIPP scores, [F (16.20), p < 0.0001]. Post hoc analysis revealed significant reduction in PIPP scores 30 seconds after heel lance in sucrose group (pacifier dipped in 24 % sucrose - estimated at 0.02g), (mean 7.87, SD 3.35), compared to control group [(mean 9.80, SD 3.55), F (24.09), p < 0.0001]. Statistically significant reduction in PIPP scores in pacifier and water group (mean 8.44, SD 3.55) compared to control group [(mean 9.80, SD 3.55), F (9.00), [ p = 0.003]. Trend towards lower PIPP scores with sucrose and pacifier group compared to water and pacifier group [(F (3.62), p < 0.05)]

Stevens 2005

66 preterm infants (26-30 weeks), postnatal age 72 hours

Heel lance

Standard care-positioning and swaddling (n=21)

Standard care-positioning and swaddling  and 0.1 ml sterile water via syringe into the mouth immediately followed by a pacifier 2 min prior to painful procedure (n=23)

Standard care-positioning and swaddling  and 0.1 ml 24% sucrose via syringe into the mouth immediately followed by a pacifier 2 min prior to painful procedure (n=22)

These interventions were given every time there was a painful procedure during the first 28 days of life

PIPP at day 7, 14,21,28 at routine heel lance

Not reported

Significant main effect of group (p =0.03) with differences occurring between the sucrose+pacifier group and standard care group; t(60)= -2.54, p = 0.01). Mean PIPP scores were generally higher in the standard care group.

No significant main effect of time.

Adverse Effects: No group differences for adverse events, clinical outcomes or neurobiological risk status.

Storm 2002

48 preterm, median gestational age of 32 wk, median postnatal age of 14 days

Heel Lance

2 ml of 15% sucrose, n = 12
1 ml of 25% sucrose, n =12
milk via NG tube n= 12
milk via NG tube, + 25% sucrose, n = 12
All infants were given water prior to a second heel lance

Differences in crying time for pre heel lance to heel lance procedure

Changes in heart rate from pre-heel lance to heel lance procedure

Difference in skin conductance from pre heel lance to heel lance procedure

Not reported

Significantly less crying in Infants receving 1 ml of 25% sucrose (p < 0.05) and food (milk) + 1 ml of 25% sucrose (p < 0.05).

No significant differences between groups in changes in heart rate from pre-heel lance to heel lance procedure (no p- value reported)

No statistically significant smaller increase in skin conductance variables compared to their water control session (p-value not reported).

Unceta-Barrencechea 2008

150 term infants

Heel Lance

Facilitated tucking

NNS + water

NNS + 2 ml 24% sucrose

Mean crying time between groups

Modified NFCS

Mean, SD

Statistically significant differences in crying time between control group and 2 intervention groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference between sucking with placebo and sucking with sucrose groups (p = 0.735).

Statistically significant differences in pain score between control group and 2 intervention groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference between sucking with placebo and sucking with sucrose groups (p = 0.105).

2 Trials assessing pain during venipunctures

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Abad 1996

28 preterm (29 - 36 weeks gestational age) infants, postnatal age 1-26 days

Venipuncture

2 ml of 12% sucrose via syringe (n = 8)

2 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe (n = 8)

2 ml of spring water via syringe (n = 12) 2 minutes prior to venipuncture

Time crying for 3 minutes after venipuncture

Heart rate:pre solution, post solution 5 minutes after venipuncture

Mean 02 saturation and respiratory rate pre solution, post solution, 5 minutes after venipuncture

Median, IQR

Mean,SEM

Mean, SD

Significant group effect noted, (F (2, 25) = 4.26; p = 0.0256) for cry duration 3 minutes after venipuncture. Cry duration was significantly reduced in 2 ml of 24% (0.48 g) sucrose group (19.1 sec) compared to 2 ml of 12% (0.24 g) sucrose (63.1 sec) and water (72.9 sec) groups (p < 0.05)

Significant group effect for HR, F (2, 25) = 6.37, p = 0.006. Overall time effect, F (2, 50) = 14.15, p < 0.001. No significant interaction between treatment group and time. Post hoc Tukey test showed that group receiving 2 ml of 12% sucrose (0.24 g) had lower HR compared to the 2 ml of 24% sucrose group (0.48 g) or water group at all three time points (pre solution, p = 0.048; post solution, p = 0.010; 5 minutes after, p = 0.007).

No significant differences noted between groups over time for oxygen saturation and respiratory rates (no p-values reported ).     

Acharya 2004

39 preterm neonates (mean 30.5 weeks gestational age), mean postnatal age 27.2 days

Venipuncture

2 ml of 25%(0.5g) sucrose administered by syringe into front of infant's mouth over 2 minutes, 4 minutes prior to venipuncture

Duration of first cry (beginning to end of first cry); total duration of crying (onset of first cry to cessation of all crying)

Mean change in heart rate from pre-procedure, procedure and post-procedure phase of venipuncture

Mean Sa02 (%) at pre-procedure, procedure and post-procedure

Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) changes across 3 phases of venipuncture

Mean SD

Mean duration of first cry lower in infants who received sucrose [18.6 (24.4) seconds] compared to infants who received water [52.3 (56) seconds] (estimated treatment effect = 33.7, p < 0.001). Mean total duration of crying was significantly lower in infants who received sucrose [31.9(41.9) seconds] compared to infants who received water 7 [2.5(66.7) seconds] (estimated treatment effect = 40.6, p < 0.001).

Mean change in heart rate from pre procedure to procedure was lower in the infants receiving sucrose compared to water (estimated treatment effect = 7.5, p = 0.003). Mean change in heart rate from pre-procedure to post procedure was lower in the infants who received sucrose compared to water (estimated treatment effect = 4.16, p = 0.036).

No significant differences between groups with respect to changes in oxygen saturation from pre-procedure to procedure phase (p = 0.17)

Changes in mean NFCS scores were significantly lower in the sucrose group compared to water group from pre-procedure to procedure phase (estimated treatment effect = 1.08, p = 0.013) and between the pre-procedure and post-procedure phase (estimated treatment effect = 2.39, p < 0.001).

Carbajal 1999

150 term newborn infants, 3-4 days old

Venipuncture

No treatment (n = 25)

2 ml of sterile water via syringe over 30 seconds (n = 25)

2 ml of 30% glucose via syringe (n = 25)

2 ml of 30% sucrose (n = 25)

Pacifier alone (n = 25) 2 minutes prior to venipuncture

2 ml of 30% sucrose via syringe followed by sucking a pacifier (n = 25)

Douleur Aigue du Nouveau-ne (DAN) scale

Median, IQR

Median pain scores with interquartile ranges during venipuncture were: No treatment 7 (5-10); sterile water group 7 (6-10); 30% glucose group 5 (3-7); 2 ml of 30% sucrose (0.6g) group 5 (2-8); pacifier alone group 2 (1-4); 2 ml of 30% (0.6 g) sucrose with pacifier group 1 (1-2). All groups had significantly lower pain scores compared to sterile water group: 30% glucose (p = 0.005), 2 ml of 30% (0.6 g) sucrose (p = 0.01), pacifier (p < 0.0001), 2 ml of 30% (0.6 g) sucrose with pacifer (p < 0.0001). Pacifier alone group had significantly lower pain scores than infants receiving 30% glucose (p = 0.0001) or 2 ml of 30% (0.6 g) sucrose (p = 0.001). Trend towards lower pain scores for infants receiving 2 ml of 30% (0.16 g) sucrose with pacifier compared to pacifier alone (p < 0.06)

Gaspardo 2008

33 preterm infants. Median (Range) gestational age of intervention group  30 (25-33). Median (Range) gestational age of control  group  31 (27-33)

Pain assessed at venipuncture phases (baseline, antisepsis, puncture, dressing, recovery). Sucrose administered before every minor painful procedure (venipuncture, arterial puncture, heel-lance, intravenous cannulation, endotracheal tube introduction, endotracheal tube suctioning, gavage insertion for feeding, removal of electrode leads and tape)

0.5 ml/kg  of sterile water 2 min prior to procedure

0.5 ml/kg  25% sucrose 2 min prior to procedure

Volume of solution was adjusted for current body weight

Incidence of cry

Heart Rate

Neonatal facial coding system (NFCS) score

Activated Behavioural State (ABS) score

Percentage

Percentage with rate greater than 160 beats per min (bpm)

Percentage attaining score equal to or greater than 3

Percentage attaining score equal to or greater than 4

On the second day there was a significant difference between the sucrose and control groups in the antisepsis phase (p = 0.04) and puncture phases (p = 0.009). On day 3, there was a significant difference between groups in the dressing phase (p = 0.04). On day 4, significant differences existed between groups at th puncture phase (p = 0.03). 

No significant differences in HR were observed.   

NFCS: A significant difference was seen between sucrose and control groups on day 2 at the puncture phase (p = 0.05) favouring the glucose group. A significant difference was also observed on day 3 at the antisepsis phase (p = 0.02) in favour of the sucrose group. At the dressing phase, the trend favoured the sucrose groups, but this result was not significant (p = 0.09). No significant differences were observed on day 4, but a trend favouring the sucrose group was noted in the  puncture (p = 0.08) and dressing (p= 0.09) phases.    

ABS: A significant difference was seen between sucrose and control groups on day 2 at the puncture phase (p = 0.05) favouring the sucrose group. A significant difference were also observed on day 3 at the antisepsis phase (p = 0.02) in favour of the glucose group. At the dressing phase, the trend favoured the sucrose groups, but this result was not significant (p= 0.09). No significant differences were observed on day 4, but a trend favouring the sucrose group was noted in the  puncture (p = 0.08) and dressing (p = 0.09) phases.

3 Trials assessing pain during heel lances and venipunctures

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Ogawa 2005

100 healthy full term infants

Heel lancegroup gestational age (GA) 40 weeks (range 38-42 weeks)

Heel lance + sucrose group GA 39 weeks (range 37-41 weeks)

Venipuncture group GA 39 weeks (range 37-41 weeks)

Venipuncture + sucrose group GA 39 weeks (range 37-41 weeks)

Heel lance (HL) or Venipuncture (VP)

Heel lance + 0.1 ml of sterile water on infant's tongue via syringe 2 min before procedure (n=25)

Heel lance + 0.1 ml of 50% sucrose on infant's tongue via syringe 2 min before procedure (n=25)

Venipuncture + 0.1 ml of sterile water on infant's tongue via syringe 2 min before procedure (n=25)

Venipuncture + 0.1 ml of 50% sucrose on infant's tongue via syringe 2 min before procedure (n=25)

Duration of first cry (sec), First crying time/total procedure time (%) and the ration of crying: no crying

NFCS score 1 min after oral administration of water/sucrose (1), disinfection of skin before HL or VP (2), during skin puncture (3), during blood sampling (4), during compression to stop bleeding (5), during application of plaster (6) and 1 min after application of plaster (7)

Reported Medians, range and Mean, SD

Reported in graph form, median and interquartile range

Significant reduction in duration of first cry in heel lance group given sucrose compared to heel lance alone, p < 0.05.

Significantly reduced NFCS scores in sucrose group during heel lance (median 47, interquartile range 31-60) and during compression to stop bleeding (median 32, interquartile range 8-54) compared to the water group (median 58 interquartile range 54-65, median 52, interquartile range 41-61 respectively) (p < 0.01).

Sucrose did not significantly reduce NFCS scores during or after venipuncture.

4 Trials assessing pain during ROP exams

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Boyle 2006

40 preterm infants, median gestational age (GA) 29 weeks (24-34 weeks)

Sterile water group: median GA 27 weeks, median postnatal age 45 days.

Sucrose group: median GA 29 weeks, median postnatal age 43 days

Water and pacifier group: median GA 30 weeks, median postnatal age 41 days

Sucrose and pacifier group: median GA 29 weeks, median postnatal age mean 42 days

Eye exam for retinopathy of prematurity

1 ml sterile water via a syringe into the mouth (n=10)

1 ml sucrose 33% via a syringe into the mouth (n=10)

1 ml sterile water via a syringe into the mouth and pacifier (n=9)

1 ml sucrose 33% via a syringe into the mouth and pacifier (n=11)

*all were given two minutes before start of  the eye exam*

 

 

Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) during examination of eye

Mean, SD, 95% CI

Significant differences in PIPP scores between the groups, p = 0.023.

Infants in pacifier groups scored significantly lower than groups without pacifiers, p = 0.003 (95% CI -4.23, -0.96).

No significant differences between groups receiving sucrose vs. groups receiving water.

 

.

Gal 2005

23 neonates, gestational age 24-29 weeks, postnatal age 28-93 days

Eye examination for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)

2 ml of sterile water

2 ml of 24% sucrose (n=23, crossover design)

Mydriatic eye drops (Phenylephrine HCl 1% cyclopentolate HCl 0.2%) and local anaesthetic eye drops (proparacaine HCl 0.5%; 2 drops) given to both groups prior to exam

Decreased oxygen saturation by ≥10% preexamination, at eye speculum insertion and postexamination

PIPP scores at 5 min and 1 min pre-exam, eye speculum insertion, and 1 min and 5 min post-exam

Percentage of population

Means, SD reported

No significant difference in oxygen saturation between water group and sucrose group.

PIPP score at the eye exam significantly lower in the group given sucrose (mean 8.3, SD 4.5) compared to the placebo group (mean 10.5, SD 4.0), p = 0.01); however, this effect was not sustained at 1 and 5 min post-exam.

Grabska 2005

32 preterm infants, mean gestational age 28 weeks, mean postnatal age 50.8 days

 

Eye exam for retinopathy of prematurity

Sterile water delivered either directly into the mouth or via a nipple 2 min prior to eye exam (n=16)

24% oral sucrose was delivered either directly into the mouth or via a nipple 2 min prior to eye exam (n=16)

Doses were adjusted by weight

<1kg=0.5cm3 (0.12g); 1-1.5kg=1.0cm3 (0.24g); 1.5-2kg=1.5 cem3 (0.36g); >2kg=2.0cm3 (0.48g)

All infants were swaddled and offered a pacifier

All infants received tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 2.5% eye drops approx. 30 min before exam. Topical tetracaine was instilled into the eyes just prior to the exam. 

% of the eye exam the infant spent crying 

 

Mean HR, at baseline, post-eye drop instillation, post-study drug, during eye exam and post eye exam*

RR and oxygen saturation at baseline, post-eye drop instillation, post-study drug, during eye exam and post eye exam*

PIPP at  baseline, during eye exam, post eye exam*

*measures are taken at 1 minute intervals and are averaged for each study period - study period times (in min) is not defined

Mean, SD

No significant difference in crying time between the sucrose and water groups.

Significant increases in HR, in both groups from baseline, p <0.01.

No differences between the sucrose and placebo groups in HR at any time point.

Significant reduction in oxygen saturation in infants receiving sucrose after the study drug (mean 95%, SD 4%) compared to the water group (mean 97%, SD 3%)

Significant reduction in oxygen saturation in infants receiving sucrose during the eye exam (mean 93%, SD 5%; p < 0.05) compared to the water group (mean 96% SD 3%; p < 0.05).

No significant difference in RR and oxygen saturation at two minutes post-exam.

No significant differences in PIPP scores between the sucrose and placebo groups before, during and after eye exams.

Mitchell 2004

30 preterm infants

Water group: mean gestational age 27.3 weeks, mean postnatal age 8.2 weeks

Sucrose group: mean gestational age 26.5 weeks, mean postnatal age=8.5 weeks

 

 

Eye exam for retinopathy

Pacifier and 3 doses of 0.1 ml sterile water via syringe into the mouth (n=15)

Pacifier and 3 doses of 0.1 ml 24% sucrose via syringe into the mouth (n=15)

*1st dose given 1.5 minutes before local anesthetic eye drops, 2nd dose right at placement of the eye speculum, 3rd dose 120s after 2nd drop*

All infants received proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% eye drops and were swaddled before the eye examination

 

PIPP at baseline, at eye drop instillation, at examination of left eye and at 30s, 60s, 90s and 120s after the exam

Mean, SEM

Statistically significant differences in mean PIPP scores were found between sucrose group (mean 8.8, Mean SE 0.7) and the water group (mean 11.4, Mean SE 0.6) during the eye examination p = 0.0077. However this was not sustained after the eye examination.

 

 

Rush 2005

30 preterm infants <32 weeks gestational age (GA) or weighing <1500g

 

Control group mean GA 28.88 weeks (range 25-31 weeks)

 

Treatment group mean GA of 29.57 weeks (range 26-32 weeks)

 

 

Eye exam for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Prior to exam: instillation of 0.5% proparacaine and 1% tropicamide,  then 15 minutes later eye drop instillation of 0.5% tropicamide, 2.5% phenylephrin and, 0.5% tropicamide.

Control group: no swaddling, no pacifier and no holding (n=16)

Treatment group: Swaddled in warm blanket 15 minutes prior to exam; given pacifier soaked in 24% sucrose solution and held by nurse until 15 minutes after examination (n=14)

Total crying time out of 5 minutes starting at the onset of the ROP exam

HR 30 min before eye drop instillation and 5 min before ROP exam, during exam, 5 min after exam

Oxygen saturation and RR at 30 min before eye drop instillation and 5 min before the ROP exam, oxygen saturation and RR at ROP (3 measurements) and oxygen saturation and RR 5 minutes after ROP exam

Reported Means and SEM

Not reported

Oxygen saturation means and SEM reported

RR not reported

No significant differences in crying time between treatment and control groups.

 

There was no significant difference in heart rate between groups.

No significant differences between treatment group and the control group for oxygen saturation and respiratory rate at any point.

5 Trials assessing pain during subcutaneous injections

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Allen 1996

285 term infants

 

Various age groups based on required immunizations. Age groups were:

2 weeks, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 15 months, and 18 months.

 

Only data for neonates at 2 weeks of age are included in this review.

 

 

Subcutaneous injection

2 ml 12% Sucrose

 

2 ml sterile water

 

No treatment

 

 

Cry duration (during and after procedure)

Mean, SD

 

Percent time crying

The overall P-value for percent time crying was significant (F= 5.92, p < 0.005). Pair wise comparisons of the percent time spent crying of sucrose and water groups versus the no treatment group show significant differences (p < 0.01 for both comparisons).

 

This was the only age group in which significant differences were observed between sucrose, water, and no treatment groups.

Mucignat 2004

33 preterm neonates, mean (SD) gestational age at birth 30 weeks (6 days), gestational age at injection 32 weeks (6 days)

Subcutaneous Injections

Non-nutritive pacifier sucking (41 injections)

0.2-0.5 ml of 30% sucrose with pacifier (86 injections)

local application of EMLA with pacifier (71 injections)

0.2-0.5 ml of sucrose with EMLA and pacifier (67 injections)

Duration of cry from needle introduction until to 2 minutes after its removal

Heart rate (HR) before injection, during injection and after injection

Oxygen saturation before injection, during injections and after injection

Douler Aigue Du Nouveau-ne (DAN) and Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) scores during injection

Mean, SD

Crying time was significantly lower in the sucrose + EMLA+ Pacifier group (p = 0.0002). The mean (SD) crying time in each group was as follows: 3.93 sec (2.97) in the pacifer only group, 2.81 sec (4.81) in the EMLA + Pacifier group, 2.32 sec (7.51) in the sucrose + pacifier group and 0.89 sec (2.66) in the sucrose with EMLA +Pacifier group.

There were no significant differences in HR between the four groups

The only significant difference in oxygen saturation between groups occurred during injection, which was lower in the NNS group (p = 0.02)

Significant reduction in DAN and NFCS scores in EMLA+NNS, sucrose+NNS, and sucrose+ EMLA+Pacfier groups compared to NNS alone.

6 Trials assessing pain during nasogastric intubations

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

McCullough 2008

20 infants,

Mean (SD) gestational age 30.7 weeks (2.3)

 

NG tube (NGT) insertion

0.5 - 2 ml of Sterile water 2 min prior to procedure

 

0.5 - 2 ml 24% sucrose 2 min prior to procedure

 

Volume of solution was adjusted for current body weight

 

> 2kg = 2 ml

1.5kg to 2kg = 1.5 ml

<1.5kg = 0.5 ml

Incidence of cry

Baseline heart rate and change in HR from baseline during NGT insertion

Baseline oxygen saturation and change in oxygen saturation from baseline during NGT insertion

Neonatal Facial Coding Score (NFCS) during NGT insertion and after insertion

Percentage

Mean, SD

Median

There was a non-significant trend (p = 0.069) for fewer sucrose-treated infants to cry during NGT insertion (8/26), compared with the placebo group (14/25).

Infants in the sucrose group had higher mean pretreatment baseline heart rate than placebo group but showed no change in heart rate during NGT insertion (mean change -0.7 bpm). The placebo groups heart rate increased during NFT insertion (mean change +11). This difference approached statistical significance (p = 0.055)

No significant changes in mean oxygen saturation occurred in either groups.

Sucrose group had a significant lower median NFCS score during NGT insertion compared with the water group [1(range 0-4) vs. 3 (range 0-4), median difference 1 (95% CI 0 to 2) p = 0.004].

After NGT insertion, the NFCS scores fell to a median of 0 in both groups.

To see if NFCS is specific for pain, authors analyzed the 4 components on their own. Nasolabial folds showed a significant inhibition in the sucrose group [present in 4/26 or (15%) compared with 12/25 (48%) in the placebo group; p = 0.012].

7 Trials assessing pain during circumcision

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Herschel 1998

120 healthy male newborns, gestational age 38 weeks or greater

Circumcision

Control group - no treatment (n=40)

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) - 0.8 ml of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine injected into dorsolateral penile root 3 min before procedure (n=40)

Pacifier dipped in 50% sucrose with a gauze pad moistened with sucrose inside the nipple 2 min before procedure (n=39)

Heart rate (HR) at baseline, restraint, skin preparation for procedure, lateral clamping, lysis of adhesions, dorsal clamping, dorsal cut, retraction, application of Gomco bell and clamp, tightening of clamp, excision of foreskin, removal of clamp, removal of bell, placement of dressing and overall change in heart rate from baseline

Oxygen saturation at baseline and throughout procedure; change from baseline during the circumcision procedure

Mean, SD, mean differences and 95% CI

Mean change in HR from baseline through all follow-up times were significantly different between groups (p-values < 0.001).

Mean HR differences + 95% CIs: control vs. DPNB, 27.1 bpm (17.6, 36.6), control vs. sucrose, 9.7 bpm (0.1, 19.3), and sucrose vs. DPNB, 17.4 bpm (7.8, 27.0).

Sucrose had statistically significant effect compared to the no treatment controls (p < 0.001)

Significant differences between groups in changes in oxygen saturation from baseline to circumcision ( P < .001).

Mean oxygen saturation differences + 95% CI between the 3 groups from baseline: -2.5 (-15.8 to 3.12) for the control group, -0.8 (-4.3 to 5.5) for the DPNB group and 0.7 (-6.8 to 12.5) for the sucrose group.

Differences between both the DPNB and sucrose groups compared to control were significant (p < 0.05)

Control vs. sucrose, -3.3 (-5.0 to -1.6) was statisically significant (p < 0.001)

Kaufman 2002

57 term infants, mean age at time of procedure 30-43 hours

Circumcision

Gomco method and pacifier dipped in water (n=14)

Gomco method and pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose (n=14)

Mogen method and pacifier dipped in water (n=15)

Mogen method and pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose (n=14)

All infants had EMLA cream applied 1-3 hours before procedure

Time spent crying during procedure

Time spent grimicing

Procedure stages:

1) Table - Restraint,

2) Restraint - Forceps,

3) Forceps - Excision,

4) Excision - Unrestraint

5) Unrestraint - End

Median and Means, Graphically

Not reported

Cumulative mean time crying for forceps to unrestraint interval in the Gomco-sucrose group was 56 seconds (median = 53 sec) compared to 86 seconds (median = 78 sec) in the Gomco-water group ( p = 0.0001). Crying time in Mogen-sucrose and Mogen-water groups were not significantly different.

Overall, mean crying time significantly decreased in infants treated with sucrose compared to infants treated with water (p = 0.0001).

Significantly less time spent grimacing in the Gomco-sucrose group compared to the Gomco-water group (p = 0.0001).

No significant differences between Mogen-sucrose and the Mogen-water groups.

Overall, mean time grimacing was significantly reduced in infants treated with sucrose compared to infants treated with water (p = 0.0001).

Stang 1997

80 healthy term newborn male infants, mean gestational age 39.5 weeks

Circumcision

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) (0.8 ml lidocaine and 0.2 ml saline) plus pacifier dipped in water and using new padded restraint chair

DPNB with buffer (0.8 ml of lidocaine and 0.2 ml of sodium bicarbonate) and pacifier dipped in water

DPNB (0.8 ml lidocaine and 0.2 ml saline) and pacifier dipped in 24% sucrose

Control: DPNB (0.8 ml lidocaine and 0.2 ml saline) and pacifier dipped in water

Plasma cortisol level 30 minutes after beginning circumcision

Mean, SD

Plasma cortisol levels not significantly different between groups.

8 Trials assessing pain during bladder catherization

Study

Participants

Procedures

Intervention

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Rogers 2006

80 infants less than or equal to 90 days of age requiring bladder catheterization

Subgroup analysis performed: infants 1-30, 31-60, and 61-90 days of age

Bladder Catheterization

2 ml of sterile water via syringe 2 min before procedure (n=40)

2 ml of 24% sucrose via syringe 2 min before procedure (n=40)

Percentage of subjects crying at maximal insertion (%)

Percentage

Subgroup analysis of infants (1-30 days) receiving sucrose were significantly less likely to cry during maximal catheter insertion compared to water group (28.6%, vs. 78.6%, p = 0.008).

9 Trials assessing pain during multiple procedures

Study

Participants

Procedure

Interventions

Outcomes

Metrics used

Results

Boyer 2004

103 infants, GA < 31 weeks (57 infants included in this analysis)

All painful procedures during the 1st week of life

Before every painful procedure, up to 3 doses of:

0.1 ml of 24% sucrose (n=27)

0.1 ml of sterile water (n=30)

Salivary cortisol levels at baseline, 30 minutes after painful procedure at days 1,3,5,7

Mean, SD

No significant differences between groups for mean cortisol levels at baseline or post painful procedures.

Taddio 2008

240 newborn infants born to non-diabetic and diabetic mothers, gestational age greater than or equal to 36 weeks

3 heel lances, venipuncture and intramuscular vitamin K injection

2 ml of 24% sucrose given to infants of non-diabetic mothers (n=60)

2 ml of 24% sucrose given to infants of diabetic mothers (n=60)

2 ml of sterile water given to infants of non-diabetic mothers (n=60)

2 ml of sterile water given to infants of diabetic mothers (n=60)

PIPP scores overall, during intramuscular injection, during venipuncture and all three heel lances

Mean, SD, 95% CI

Overall PIPP scores significantly lower among newborns given sucrose (mean 6.8, SD 2.9) compared to placebo (mean 8.1, SD 2.5) (mean difference-1.3, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.6, p < 0.001).

PIPP scores during intramuscular injection did not differ between the sucrose and placebo group for non-diabetic or diabetic mothers.

PIPP score during venipuncture was significantly lower among infants of non-diabetic mothers who received sucrose compared to placebo (mean score 5.7, 95% CI 4.7-6.7 vs. mean score 8.9, 95% CI 7.9-9.9, p < 0.001). Similar results were found among infants of diabetic mothers (sucrose: mean score 6.8, 95% CI 5.7-7.9 vs. placebo: mean score 9.2, 95% CI 8.4-10.1, p < 0.001).

During first 3 heel lances, newborns from diabetic mothers receiving sucrose or placebo did not have significantly different PIPP scores

References to studies

Included studies

Abad 1996

Abad F, Diaz NM, Domenech E, Robayna M, Rico J. Oral sweet solution reduces pain-related behavior in preterm infants. Acta Paediatrica 1996;85:854-8.

Acharya 2004

Acharya AB, Annamali S, Taub NA, Field D. Oral sucrose analgesia for preterm infant venepuncture. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2004;89:F17-8.

Allen 1996

Allen KD, White DD, Walburn JN. Sucrose as an analgesic agent for infants during immunization injections. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 1996;150:270-4.

Blass 1997

Blass EM. Milk-induced hypoalgesia in human newborns. Pediatrics 1997;99:825-9.

Blass 1999

Blass EM, Watt LB. Suckling- and sucrose-induced analgesia in human newborns. Pain 1999;83:611-23.

Boyer 2004

Boyer K, Johnston C, Walker CD, Filion F, Sherrard A. Does sucrose analgesia promote physiologic stability in preterm neonates? Biology of the Neonate 2004;85:26-31.

Boyle 2006

Boyle EM, Freer Y, Khan-Orakzai, Watkinson M, Wright E, Ainsworth JR, et al. Sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F166-8.

Bucher 1995

Bucher HU, Moser T, von Siebenthal K, Keel M, Wolf M, Duc G. Sucrose reduces pain reaction to heel lancing in preterm infants: a placebo-controlled, randomized and masked study. Pediatric Research 1995;38:332-5.

Carbajal 1999

Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, Olivier-Martin M. Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates. British Medical Journal 1999;319:1393-7.

Codipietro 2008

Codipietro L, Ceccarelli M, Ponzone A. Breastfeeding or oral sucrose solution in term neonates receiving heel lance: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2008;122:e716-21.

Gal 2005

Gal P, Kissling GE, Young WO, Dunaway KK, Marsh VA, Jones SM, et al. Efficacy of sucrose to reduce pain in premature infants during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2005;39:1029-33.

Gaspardo 2008

Gaspardo CM, Miyase CI, Chimello JT, Martinez FE, Martins Linhares MB. Is pain relief equally efficacious and free of side effects with repeated doses of oral sucrose in preterm neonates? Pain 2008;137:16-25.

Gibbins 2002

* Gibbins S, Stevens B, Hodnett E, Pinelli J, Ohlsson A, Darlington G. Efficacy and safety of sucrose for procedural pain relief in preterm and term neonates. Nursing Research 2002;51:375-82.

Gibbins S, Stevens B. The influence of gestational age on the efficacy and short-term safety of sucrose for procedural pain relief. Advances in Neonatal Care 2003;3:241-9.

Gibbins S. Efficacy and safety of sucrose for procedural pain relief in preterm and term neonates. [Dissertation] 2001.

Gormally 2001

Gormally S, Barr RG, Wertheim L, Alkawaf R, Calinoiu N, Young SN. Contact and nutrient caregiving effects on newborn infant pain responses. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2001;43:28-38.

Grabska 2005

Grabska J, Walden P, Lerer T, Kelly C, Hussain N, Donovan T, et al. Can oral sucrose reduce the pain and distress associated with screening for retinopathy for prematurity? Journal of Perinatology 2005;25:33-5.

Greenberg 2002

Greenberg CS. A sugar-coated pacifier reduces procedural pain in newborns. Pediatric Nursing 2002;28:271-7.

Guala 2001

Guala A, Pastore G, Liverani ME, Giroletti G, Gulino F, Meriggi AI, et al. Glucose or sucrose as an analgesic for newborns: a randomized controlled blind trial. Minerva Pediatrica 2001;53:271-4.

Haouari 1995

Haouari N, Wood C, Griffiths G, Levene M. The analgesic effect of sucrose in full term infants: a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 1995;310:1498-500.

Harrison 2003

Harrison D, Johnston L, Loughnan P. Oral sucrose for procedural pain in sick hospitalized infants: a randomized-controlled trial. Journal of Paediatric and Child Health 2003;39:591-7.

Herschel 1998

Herschel M, Khoshnood B, Ellman C, Maydew N, Mittendorf R. Neonatal circumcision. Randomized trial of sucrose pacifier for pain control. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1998;152:279-84.

Isik 2000a

Isik U, Ozek E, Bilgen H, Cebeci D. Comparison of oral glucose and sucrose solutions on pain response in neonates. Journal of Pain 2000;1:275-8.

Johnston 1997a

Johnston CC, Stremler RL, Stevens BJ, Horton LJ. Effectiveness of oral sucrose and simulated rocking on pain response in preterm neonates. Pain 1997;72:193-9.

Johnston 1999a

Johnston CC, Stremler R, Horton L, Friedman A. Effect of repeated doses of sucrose during heel stick procedure in preterm neonates. Biology of the Neonate 1999;75:160-6.

Kaufman 2002

Kaufman GE, Cimo S, Miller LW, Blass EM. An evaluation of the effects of sucrose on neonatal pain with 2 commonly used circumcision methods. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;186:564-8.

Mathai 2006

Mathai S, Natrajan N, Rajalakshmi NR. A comparative study of non-pharmacological methods to reduce pain in neonates. Indian Pediatrics 2006;43:1070-5.

McCullough 2008

McCullough S, Halton T, Mowbray D, Macfarlane PI. Lingual sucrose reduces the pain response to nasogastric tube insertion: a randomised clinical trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2008;93:F100-3.

Mitchell 2004

Mitchell A, Stevens B, Mungan N, Johnson W, Lobert S, Boss B. Analgesic effects of oral sucrose and pacifier during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity. Pain Management Nursing 2004;5:160-8.

Mucignat 2004

Mucignat V, Ducrocq S, Lebas F, Mochel F, Baudon JJ, Gold F. Analgesic effects of Emla cream and saccharose solution for subcutaneous injections in preterm newborns: a prospective study of 265 injections [Effet analgésique de la crème Emla®, du saccharose et de leur association pour les injections sous-cutanées chez le nouveau-né prématuré: étude prospective de 265 injections]. Archives of Pediatrics 2004;11:921-25.

Ogawa 2005

Ogawa S, Ogihara T, Fujiwara E, Ito K, Nakano M, Nakayama S, et al. Venepuncture is preferable to heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F432-6.

Okan 2007

Okan F, Coban A, Ince Z, Yapici Z, Can G. Analgesia in preterm newborns: the comparative effects of sucrose and glucose. European Journal of Pediatrics 2007;166:1017-24.

Ors 1999

Ors R, Ozek E, Baysoy G, Cebeci D, Bilgen H, Turkuner M, et al. Comparison of sucrose and human milk on pain response in newborns. European Journal of Pediatrics 1999;158:63-6.

Overgaard 1999

Overgaard C, Knudsen A. Pain-relieving effect of sucrose in newborns during heel prick. Biology of the Neonate 1999;75:279-84.

Ramenghi 1996a

Ramenghi LA, Wood CM, Griffith GC, Levene MI. Reduction of pain response in premature infants using intraoral sucrose. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 1996;74:F126-8.

Ramenghi 1996b

Ramenghi LA, Griffith GC, Wood CM, Levene MI. Effect of non-sucrose sweet tasting solution on neonatal heel prick responses. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 1996;74:F129-31.

Ramenghi 1999

Ramenghi LA, Evans DJ, Levene MI. "Sucrose analgesia": absorptive mechanism or taste perception? Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 1999;80:F146-7.

Rogers 2006

Rogers AJ, Greenwald MH, DeGuzman MA, Kelly ME, Simon HK. A randomized, controlled trial of sucrose analgesia in infants younger than 90 days of age who require bladder catheterization in pediatric emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 2006;13:617-22.

Rush 2005

Rush R, Rush S, Ighani F, Anderson B, Irwin M, Naqvi M. The effects of comfort care on the pain response in preterm infants undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Retina 2005;25:59-62.

Rushforth 1993

Rushforth JA, Levene MI. Effect of sucrose on crying in response to heel stab. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1993;69:388-9.

Stang 1997

Stang HJ, Snellman LW, Condon LM, Conroy MM, Liebo R, Brodersen L, et al. Beyond dorsal penile nerve block: a more humane circumcision. Pediatrics 1997;100:E3.

Stevens 1999

Johnston CC, Sherrard A, Stevens B, Franck L, Stremler R, Jack A. Do cry features reflect pain intensity in preterm neonates? A preliminary study. Biology of the Neonate 1999;76:120-4.

* Stevens B, Johnston C, Franck L, Petryshen P, Jack A, Foster G. The efficacy of developmentally sensitive interventions and sucrose for relieving pain in very low birth weight infants. Nursing Research 1999;48:35-43.

Stevens 2005

Stevens B, Yamada J, Beyene J, Gibbins S, Petryshen P, Stinson J, et al. Consistent management of repeated procedural pain with sucrose in preterm neonates: Is it effective and safe for repeated use over time? Clinical Journal of Pain 2005;21:543-8.

Storm 2002

Storm H, Fremming A. Food intake and oral sucrose in preterms prior to heel prick. Acta Paediatrica 2002;91:555-60.

Taddio 2008

Taddio A, Shah V, Hancock R, Smith RW, Stephens D, Atenafu E. Effectiveness of sucrose analgesia in newborns undergoing painful medical procedures. Candian Medical Association Journal 2008;179:37-43.

Unceta-Barranechea 2008

Aguirre Unceta-Barrenechea A, Saitua Iturriaga G, Sainz de Rosas Aparicio I, Riveira Fernandez D. Analgesia When Taking Heel Lance Blood in the Newborn [Analgesia en la toma sanguínea de talónen los recién nacidos]. Annales de Pediatrie (Barc) 2008;69:544-7.

Excluded studies

Abad 1993

Abad F, Diaz NM, Domenech E, Robayna M, Rico J, Arrecivita A, et al. Attentuation of pain related behavior in neonates given oral sweet solutions. In: 7th World Congress on Pain. Paris, 1993.

Abad 2001

Abad F, Diaz-Gomez NM, Domenech E, Gonzalez D, Robayna M, Feria M. Oral sucrose compares favourably with lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain relief during venepuncture in neonates. Acta Paediatrica 2001;90:160-5.

Ahuja 2000

Ahuja VK, Daga SR, Gosavi DV, Date AM. Non-sucrose sweetener for pain relief in sick newborns. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2000;67:487-9.

Barbier 1994

Barbier P, Lionnet C, Jonville AP, Hamon B, Autret E, Laugier J, et al. Does the placebo effect exist in newborn infants? Therapie 1994;49:113-6.

Barr 1993

Barr RG, Oberlander T, Quek V, Brian J, Cassidy K-L, Beauparlant J, et al. Dose-response analgesic effect of intraoral sucrose in newborns [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1993.

Barr 1995

Barr RG, Young SN, Wright JH, Cassidy KL, Hendricks L, Bedad Y, et al. "Sucrose analgesia" and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunizations at 2 and 4 months. Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics 1995;16:220-5.

Bilgen 2001

Bilgen H, Ozek E, Cebeci D, Ors R. Comparison of sucrose, expressed breast milk, and breast-feeding on the neonatal response to heel prick. Journal of Pain 2001;2:301-5.

Blass 1991

Blass EM, Hoffmeyer LB. Sucrose as an analgesic for newborn infants. Pediatrics 1991;87:215-8.

Blass 1995

Blass EM, Shah A. Pain-reducing properties of sucrose in human newborns. Chemical Senses 1995;20:29-35.

Blass 2001

Blass EM, Miller EW. Effects of colostrum in newborn humans. dissociation between analgesic and cardiac effects. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 2001;22:385-90.

Bucher 2000

Bucher HU, Baumgartner R, Bucher N, Seiler M, Fauchere JC. Artificial sweetner reduces nociceptive reaction in newborn infants. Early Human Development 2000;59:51-60.

Curtis 2007

Curtis SJ, Jou H, Ali S, Vandermeer B, Klassen T. A randomized controlled trial of sucrose and/or pacifier as analgesia for infants receiving venipuncture in a pediatric emergency department. BMC Pediatrics 2007;7:27.

Efe 2007

Efe E, Savaser S. The effect of two different methods used during peripheral venous blood collection on pain reduction in neonates. Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology 2007;19:49-56.

Fernandez 2003

Fernandez M, Blass EM, Hernandez-Reif M, Field T, Diego M, Sanders C. Sucrose attenuates a negative electroencephalographic response to an aversive stimulus for newborns. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 2003;24:261-6.

Gibbins 2000

Gibbins S, Stevens B, Ohlsson A, Hodnett E, Pinelli J. Safety and efficacy of sucrose for procedural pain in neonates. In: The 5th International Symposium on Paediatric Pain. London, 2000:P98.

Gormally 1996

Gormally SM, Barr RG, Young SN, Alhawaf R, Wersheim L. Combined sucrose and carrying reduces newborn pain response more than sucrose or carrying alone. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1996;150:47.

Graillon 1997

Graillon A, Barr RG, Young SN, Wright JH, Hendricks LA. Differential response to intraoral sucrose, quinine and corn oil in crying human newborns. Physiology and Behavior 1997;62:317-25.

Isik 2000b

Isik U, Ozek E, Bilgen H, Ors R, Cebeci D, Basaran M. Comparison of oral dextrose and sucrose solutions on pain response in neonates. Pediatric Research 2000;47:403A.

Johnston 2000

Johnston C. The efficacy of sucrose analgesia for procedural pain in preterm infants < 32 weeks in the first week of life [abstract]. Pediatric Research 2000;47:405A.

Johnston 2002

Johnston CC, Filion F, Snider L, Majnemer A, Limperopolous C, Walker CD, et al. Routine sucrose analgesia during the first week of life in neonates younger than 31 weeks' postconceptional age. Pediatrics 2002;110:523-8.

Lewindon 1998

Lewindon PJ, Harkness L, Lewindon N. Randomized controlled trial of sucrose by mouth for the relief of infant crying after immunization. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1998;78:453-5.

Mellah 1999

Mellah D, Gourrier E, Merbouche S, Mouchino G, Crumiere C, Leraillez J. Analgesia with saccharose during heel capillary prick. A randomized study in 37 newborns of over 33 weeks of amenorrhea [Analgesie au saccharose lors des prelevements capillaires au talon. Etude randomisee chez 37 nouveau-nes de plus de 33 semaines d'amenorrhee]. Archives of Pediatrics 1999;6:610-6.

Mohan 1998

Mohan CG, Risucci DA, Casimir M, Gulrajani-LaCorte M. Comparison of analgesics in ameliorating the pain of circumcision. Journal of Perinatology 1998;18:13-9.

Ramenghi 2002

Ramenghi LA, Webb AV, Shevlin PM, Green M, Evans DJ, Levene MI. Intra-oral administration of sweet-tasting substances and infants' crying response to immunization: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Biology of the Neonate 2002;81:163-9.

Razmus 2004

Razmus IS, Dalton ME, Wilson D. Pain management for newborn circumcision. Pediatric Nursing 2004;30:414-7, 427.

Reis 2003

Reis EC, Roth EK, Syphan JL, Tarbell SE, Holubkov R. Effective pain reduction for multiple immunization injections in young infants. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2003;157:1115-20.

Skogsdal 1997

Skogsdal Y, Eriksson M, Schollin J. Analgesia in newborns given oral glucose. Acta Paediatrica 1997;86:217-20.

Stevens 1997b

Stevens B, Johnston C, Franck P, et al. Nonpharmacologic interventions for decreasing procedural pain in preterm neonates. In: Fourth International Symposium on Pediatric Pain. Helsinki, 1997:154.

Stevens 2000

Stevens B, Petryshen P, Johnston C, Franck L, Jack A. The influence of consistent pain management on neonatal outcomes: preliminary findings. In: The 5th International Symposium on Paediatric Pain. London, UK, 2000:P96.

Taddio 2000

Taddio A, Pollock N, Gilbert-MacLeod C, Ohlsson K, Koren G. Combined analgesia and local anesthetic to minimize pain during circumcision. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2000;154:620-3.

Taddio 2003

Taddio A, Shah V, Shah P, Katz J. Beta-endorphin concentration after administration of sucrose in preterm infants. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2003;157:1071-4.

Taddio 2009

Taddio A, Shah V, Katz J. Reduced infant response to a routine care procedure after sucrose analgesia. Pediatrics 2009;123:e425-9.

Vederhus 2006

Vederhus BJ, Eide GE, Natvig GK. Psychometric testing of a Norwegian version of the Premature Infant Pain Profile: an acute pain assessment tool. A clinical validation study. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2006;12:334-44.

Yoon 2001

Yoon HB. Pain relieving effect of intraoral sucrose replacement in neonates.. Korean Journal of Child Health 2001;7:35-50.

Studies awaiting classification

Akman 2002

Akman I, Ozek E, Bilgen H, Ozdogan T, Cebeci D. Sweet solutions and pacifiers for pain relief in newborn infants. Journal of Pain 2002;3:199-202.

Singh 2001

Singh M. The need for analgesia and sedation in newborn babies. Perinatology 2001;3:240-2.

Other references

Additional references

AAP 2000

American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Committee on Drugs. Section on Anesthesiology. Section on Surgery. Canadian Paediatric Society. Fetus and Newborn Committee. Prevention and management of pain and stress in the newborn infant. Pediatrics 2000;105:454-61.

Anand 2001

Anand KJ; International Evidence-Based Group for Neonatal Pain. Consensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2001;155:173-80.

Anand 2007

Anand KJS, Stevens BJ, McGrath PJ. Future direction for clinical research in infancy. In: Pain in Neonates and Infants. Elsevier, 2007.

Barr 1994

Barr RG, Quek V, Cousineau D, Oberlander T, Brian J, Young S. Effects of intra-oral sucrose on crying, mouthing and hand-mouth contact in newborn and six-week old infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1994;36:608-18.

Blass 1994

Blass E, Ciaramitaro V. A new look at some old mechanisms in human newborns: taste and tactile determinants of state, affect and action. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1994;59:1-80.

Campos 1994

Campos RG. Rocking and pacifier: two comforting interventions for heel stick pain. Research in Nursing and Health 1994;17:321-31.

Carbajal 2008

Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, Nolent P, Ducrocq S, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA 2008;300:60-70.

DiPietro 1994

DiPietro JA, Cusson RM, Caughy MO, Fox NA. Behavioral and physiologic effects of nonnutritive sucking during gavage feeding in preterm infants. Pediatric Research 1994;36:207-14.

Dunbar 2006

Dunbar AE 3rd, Sharek PJ, Mickas NA, Coker KL, Duncan J, McLendon D, et al. Implementation and case-study results of potentially better practices to improve pain management of neonates. Pediatrics 2006;118:S87-94.

Fernandes 1994

Fernandes CV, Rees EP. Pain management in Canadian level 3 neonatal intensive care units. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1994;150:499-504.

Gibbins 2007

Gibbins S, Stevens B, McGrath PJ, Yamada J, Beyene J, Breau L, et al. Comparison of pain responses in Infants of varying gestational ages.. Neonatology 2007;93:10-8.

Gunnar 1992

Gunnar MR. Reactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system to stressors in normal infants and children. Pediatrics 1992;90:491-7.

Harrison 2008

Harrison, DM. Oral sucrose for pain management in infants:Myths and misconceptions. Journal of Neonatal Nursing 2008;14:39-46.

Haynes 1995

Haynes MJ, Smith BA, Herrick S, Swanson EM. Behavioral differences between term and postmature infants in sucrose calming test [abstract]. In: Presented at the meeting of Society for Research in Child Development.. Indianapolis, IN, 1995.

Johnston 1997b

Johnston CC, Collinge JM, Henderson SJ, Anand KJ. A cross-sectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. The Clinical Journal of Pain 1997;13:308-12.

Johnston 2007

Johnston CC, Filion F, Snider L, Majnemer A, Limperopoulos C, Pelausa E, et al. How much sucrose is too much sucrose? Pediatrics 2007;119:226.

Lefrak 2006

Lefrak L, Burch K, Caravantes R, Knoerlein K, DeNolf N, Duncan J, et al. Sucrose analgesia: Identifying potentially better practices. Pediatrics 2006; 118:S197-S202.

Lemyre 2006

Lemyre B, Sherlock R, Hogan D, Gaboury I, Blanchard C, Moher D. How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. BMC Medicine 2006;4:11.

Powell 2001

Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2001;37:28-31.

Shah 2004

Shah V, Ipp M, Sam J, Einarson TR, Taddio A. Eliciting the minimally clinically important difference in the pain response rrom parents of newborn infants and nurses. In: Canadian Pediatric Society 81st Meeting. Montreal, Quebec: Pulsus Group, 2004.

Shah 2006

Shah PS, Aliwalas LL, Shah V. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3.

Sharek 2006

Sharek PJ, Powers R, Koehn A, Anand KJS. Evaluation and development of potentially better practices to improve pain management in neonates. Pediatrics 2006;118:S78-S86.

Smith 1992

Smith BA, Stevens K, Torgerson WS, Kim JH. Diminished reactivity of postmature human infants to sucrose compared with term infants. Developmental Psychology 1992;29:811-20.

Stevens 1994

Stevens B, Johnston C, Horton L. Factors that influence the behavioral responses of premature infants. Pain 1994;59:101-9.

Stevens 1996

Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A. Premature infants pain profile: developmental and initial validation. Clinical Journal of Pain 1996;12:13-22.

Stevens 1997a

Stevens B, Taddio A, Ohlsson A, Einarson T. The efficacy of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatrica 1997;86:837-42.

Stevens 1997c

Stevens B. Composite measures of pain in children. In: Finley GA, McGrath PJ, editor(s). Measurement of pain in infants and children. Progress in Pain Research and Management. Vol. 10. Seattle: IASP Press, 1997:161-77.

Walia 1999

Walia R, Ohlsson A. Clinical trials in neonatal medicine. In: 7th Annual Cochrane Colloquium, Abstracts, October 1999. Rome, 1999.

Willis 1977

Willis D, Chabot J, Radde I, Chance G. Unsuspected hyperosmolality of oral solutions contributing to necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics 1977;60:535-8.

Other published versions of this review

Stevens 1998

Stevens B, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub2.

Stevens 2001

Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub2.

Stevens 2004

Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A.. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub2.

Data and analyses

1 Heel Lance: Sucrose (sucrose or sucrose+NNS) vs. Control (NNS+water, water or positioning and containing intervention)

Outcome or SubgroupStudiesParticipantsStatistical MethodEffect Estimate
1.1 Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) at 30 seconds after heel lance 3220Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-1.64 [-2.47, -0.81]
1.2 Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) at 60 seconds after heel lance 3195Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-2.05 [-3.08, -1.02]
 

2 Heel Lance: Sucrose 25% to 33 % vs. Control (Sterile water)

Outcome or SubgroupStudiesParticipantsStatistical MethodEffect Estimate
2.1 % change in heart rate 1 minute after heel lance 286Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)0.90 [-5.81, 7.61]
2.2 % change in heart rate 3 minutes after heel lance 286Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-6.20 [-15.27, 2.88]
2.3 Heart rate at 3 minutes post heel lance 2154Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-0.98 [-8.29, 6.32]
 

3 Heel Lance: Sucrose 20% to 50% vs. Control (Sterile water)

Outcome or SubgroupStudiesParticipantsStatistical MethodEffect Estimate
3.1 Duration of first cry (sec) 3192Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-8.99 [-20.07, 2.10]
3.2 Total crying time (sec) 288Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-39.26 [-44.29, -34.24]
 

4 ROP Exam: Sucrose 24% to 33% (sucrose or sucrose + NNS) vs. Control (water or water + NNS)

Outcome or SubgroupStudiesParticipantsStatistical MethodEffect Estimate
4.1 PIPP score during (L) eye exam 382Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-1.27 [-2.29, -0.25]
  4.1.1 Sucrose via syringe vs. Control (sterile water via syringe) 252Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-0.65 [-1.88, 0.59]
  4.1.2 Sucrose + pacifier vs. Control (sterile water + pacifier) 130Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-2.60 [-4.41, -0.79]
 

5 ROP Exam: Sucrose 24% to 33% (sucrose or sucrose + NNS) vs. Control (water or water + NNS)

Outcome or SubgroupStudiesParticipantsStatistical MethodEffect Estimate
5.1 Oxygen saturation (%) during eye exam 262Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)-2.58 [-4.94, -0.23]
 

Figures

Figure 1 (Analysis 3.1)

 

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Heel Lance: Sucrose 20-50% vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 3.1 Duration of first cry (sec).Forest plot of comparison: 3 Heel Lance: Sucrose 20-50% vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 3.1 Duration of first cry (sec).

Figure 2 (Analysis 3.2)

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Heel Lance: Sucrose 20-50% vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 3.2 Total crying time (sec).

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Heel Lance: Sucrose 20-50% vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 3.2 Total crying time (sec).

Figure 3 (Analysis 2.1)

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Heel Lance: Sucrose 25 - 33 % vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 2.1 % change in heart rate 1 minute after heel lance.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Heel Lance: Sucrose 25 - 33 % vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 2.1 % change in heart rate 1 minute after heel lance.

Figure 4 (Analysis 2.2)

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Heel Lance: Sucrose 25 - 33 % vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 2.2 % change in heart rate 3 minutes after heel lance.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Heel Lance: Sucrose 25 - 33 % vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 2.2 % change in heart rate 3 minutes after heel lance.

Figure 5 (Analysis 2.3)

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Heel Lance: Sucrose 25 - 33 % vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 2.3 Heart rate at 3 minutes post heel lance.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Heel Lance: Sucrose 25 - 33 % vs. Control (Sterile water), outcome: 2.3 Heart rate at 3 minutes post heel lance.

Figure 6 (Analysis 1.1)

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Heel Lance: Sucrose (sucrose or sucrose+NNS) vs. Control (NNS+water, water or positioning and containing intervention), outcome: 1.1 Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) at 30 seconds after heel lance.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Heel Lance: Sucrose (sucrose or sucrose+NNS) vs. Control (NNS+water, water or positioning and containing intervention), outcome: 1.1 Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) at 30 seconds after heel lance.

Figure 7 (Analysis 1.2)

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Heel Lance: Sucrose (sucrose or sucrose+NNS) vs. Control (NNS+water, water or positioning and containing intervention), outcome: 1.2 Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) at 60 seconds after heel lance.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Heel Lance: Sucrose (sucrose or sucrose+NNS) vs. Control (NNS+water, water or positioning and containing intervention), outcome: 1.2 Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) at 60 seconds after heel lance.

Figure 8 (Analysis 5.1)

Forest plot of comparison: 7 ROP Exam: Sucrose 24-33% (sucrose or sucrose + NNS) vs. Control (water or water + NNS), outcome: 7.1 Oxygen saturation (%) during eye exam.

Forest plot of comparison: 7 ROP Exam: Sucrose 24-33% (sucrose or sucrose + NNS) vs. Control (water or water + NNS), outcome: 7.1 Oxygen saturation (%) during eye exam.

Sources of support

Internal sources

External sources

This review is published as a Cochrane review in The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2010 (see http://www.thecochranelibrary.com for information).  Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback.  The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.